transform "" to "Word1...Wordn"
I have a bunch of expressions of the form: "" lower case words with spaces between them enclosed in angle brackets. (the ... means 0 or more). I would like a macro (place cursor within <>s and execute macro) that converts the above to: "Word1Word2...Wordn" Is the only way to do this to write a function? Thanks. RME -- This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
escaping special characters in visual search
I've got the following visual maps which I use to do visual base searches: vmap F y?" vmap f y/" They work great, select some characters in visual mode and then enter 'f' (or 'F'). The one caveat is if there are characters that have special meaning in searched such as the '[' ']' pair in the visual selection, then the search fails. Does anyone have a macro that will allow visual selection based searches that account for such special characters being in the selection? Thanks. RME -- This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: Bug in chaining dictionary function calls
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
I found a problem with chaining function calls through the new
dictionary functions. Here is some code demonstrate the problem, if you
execute this code, the last line generates an E488 error, where as the
previous lines combines (they are equivalent) works fine.
let tt = {}
function! tt.TT()
echomsg 'This is TT'
endfunction
let t = {'tt': tt}
function t.T()
return self.tt
endfunction
let tmptt = t.T()
call tmptt.TT()
call t.T().TT()
You cannot call a function in the LHS of an assignment.
Forgive me, but which statement is not legal?
Thanks.
Richard
--
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
copies of the original message.
Re: Bug in chaining dictionary function calls
I reported this as bug number 1492165,
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=391887&group_id=27891&func=browse
Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
I found a problem with chaining function calls through the new
dictionary functions. Here is some code demonstrate the problem, if you
execute this code, the last line generates an E488 error, where as the
previous lines combines (they are equivalent) works fine.
let tt = {}
function! tt.TT()
echomsg 'This is TT'
endfunction
let t = {'tt': tt}
function t.T()
return self.tt
endfunction
let tmptt = t.T()
call tmptt.TT()
call t.T().TT()
--
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
copies of the original message.
Bug 1492165 - Dictionary function chaining
Just an FYI, I've just submitted a demonstration patch
that allows one to do dictionary function chaining.
Some of you might be interested in extending the
patch to include value access via applying a key
to the results of a function (if the function returns
a dictionary).
RME
Text to bug report:
This concerns functions and dictionaries
While bug: 1491613 is a true error in the existing
code, this bug is more of an enhancement.
Currently if a function returns a dictionary, one
can not call a function on that returned dictionary
(or access a value via a key) inline:
let v = dict1.getDict2().getValue()
(
Note: the include patch does not address the following:
let v = dict1.getDict2().somekey
let v = dict1.getDict2()[somekey]
)
With this patch the following code:
XXX
"
" example of function chaining
"
let gt6 = {'cylinder': 6, 'manufacture': "Triumph" }
let twodoor = {'sunbeam': "sunbeam", 'gt6': gt6 }
function twodoor.getGt6() dict
return self.gt6
endfunction
let fourdoor = {'stationwagon': "stationwagon", 'sedan': "sedan" }
let cars = {'twodoor': twodoor, 'fourdoor': fourdoor }
function cars.getTwodoor() dict
return self.twodoor
endfunction
function cars.getFourdoor() dict
return self.fourdoor
endfunction
let pickup = {'ford': "Ford", "toyota": "Toyota" }
let van = {'ford': "Ford", "gm": "GM" }
let trucks = {'pickup': pickup, "van": van }
function trucks.getPickup() dict
return self.pickup
endfunction
function trucks.getVan() dict
return self.van
endfunction
let vehicles = {'cars': cars, "trucks": trucks }
function vehicles.getCars() dict
return self.cars
endfunction
function vehicles.getTrucks() dict
return self.trucks
endfunction
echo "gt6 = " . string(vehicles.getCars().getTwodoor().getGt6())
XXX
produces the the following:
gt6 = {'cylinder': 6, 'manufacture': 'Triumph'}
The included patch is more of a demonstration of what
can be done (it also includes the patch associated with
bug 1491613). It only allows for mult-level function
chaining. In addition, I am certain that its not the
correct way to implement this feature.
--
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
copies of the original message.
Set color block of text
Is there a way in a vim script to set the color (fg/bg) to a block of text? say from line 12 to line 15 and from column 4 to column 9. The text in this block can be anything, not syntax. RME -- This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: fast file opening / find file as you type
Up at the vim site theres a script called javae.vim: http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1164 This lets one create a list of directory paths to Java source code. Then, if one places the cursor over a class name, you can jump to the associated source file. RME Benjamin Reitzammer wrote: Hi, I've searched the archive and asked many search engines for help, but I still haven't found what I'm looking for (well, I'll stop the humming, singing instantly ;) Currently I switch between jEdit and vim on a hourly basis, depending on the machine I'm working. I really love vim and would like to use it exclusively, but until now there's one major thing missing for me, that I couldn't find. "Find filenames as you type, and open them instantly" or explained in more detail ... In jEdit there's a plugin called Openit (http://plugins.jedit.org/plugins/?OpenIt) which let's me configure a number of directories. It then indexes the filenames contained in these directories. Then it gives me the opportunity to search through all the indexed filenames very, very quickly, and opening a found file. Combined with fast typing, knowing the names of your files, and a shortcut for opening the searching window, this is awesome. I've uploaded a screenshot to better convey what I mean. It's at http://nur-eine-i.de/openit_screenshot.png Now my question: Is there something similar for vim? Or do you guys have any hacks, shell scripts for achieving this? Pressing a key combination, typing in some letters, hitting enter and you opened another file? This would really make my day (and some more weeks), if there was anything like that for vim. Thanks for reading and for your help Cheers Benjamin -- This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
vim7 spell none file
with a file with no extension when ss is executed regardless of whats in the file I get: Spell check done: 1 possible spell errors in 1 words. For a *.java file I get spelling errors highlighted in comments so spell is working - at least for java comments. How do I get spell to work on a "none" file? A default, out-of-the-box, Vim unix install. Thanks. RME -- This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
