Patch 7.2a.009
Patch 7.2a.009
Problem:cygwin_conv_to_posix_path() does not specify buffer size.
Solution: Use new Cygwin function: cygwin_conv_path(). (Corinna Vinschen)
Files: src/main.c, src/os_unix.c
*** ../vim-7.2a.008/src/main.c Wed Jun 25 00:33:06 2008
--- src/main.c Sat Jun 28 17:07:03 2008
***
*** 20,26
#ifdef __CYGWIN__
# ifndef WIN32
! # include sys/cygwin.h /* for cygwin_conv_to_posix_path() */
# endif
# include limits.h
#endif
--- 20,28
#ifdef __CYGWIN__
# ifndef WIN32
! # include cygwin/version.h
! # include sys/cygwin.h /* for cygwin_conv_to_posix_path() and/or
!* cygwin_conv_path() */
# endif
# include limits.h
#endif
***
*** 2213,2219
--- 2215,2225
{
char posix_path[PATH_MAX];
+ # if CYGWIN_VERSION_DLL_MAJOR = 1007
+ cygwin_conv_path(CCP_WIN_A_TO_POSIX, p, posix_path, PATH_MAX);
+ # else
cygwin_conv_to_posix_path(p, posix_path);
+ # endif
vim_free(p);
p = vim_strsave(posix_path);
if (p == NULL)
*** ../vim-7.2a.008/src/os_unix.c Tue Jun 24 23:13:23 2008
--- src/os_unix.c Sat Jun 28 17:08:30 2008
***
*** 58,64
#ifdef __CYGWIN__
# ifndef WIN32
! # include sys/cygwin.h /* for cygwin_conv_to_posix_path() */
# endif
#endif
--- 58,66
#ifdef __CYGWIN__
# ifndef WIN32
! # include cygwin/version.h
! # include sys/cygwin.h /* for cygwin_conv_to_posix_path() and/or
!* for cygwin_conv_path() */
# endif
#endif
***
*** 2312,2318
--- 2314,2324
/*
* This helps for when /etc/hosts is a symlink to c:/something/hosts.
*/
+ # if CYGWIN_VERSION_DLL_MAJOR = 1007
+ cygwin_conv_path(CCP_WIN_A_TO_POSIX, fname, posix_fname, MAXPATHL);
+ # else
cygwin_conv_to_posix_path(fname, posix_fname);
+ # endif
fname = posix_fname;
#endif
*** ../vim-7.2a.008/src/version.c Sat Jun 28 16:09:31 2008
--- src/version.c Sun Jun 29 13:56:55 2008
***
*** 678,679
--- 678,681
{ /* Add new patch number below this line */
+ /**/
+ 9,
/**/
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
112. You are amazed that anyone uses a phone without a modem on it...let
alone hear actual voices.
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
///sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org///
\\\help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org///
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: updated 'relativenumber' patch
Richard - On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 01:23, Markus Heidelberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have adapted my relativenumber patch to Vim 7.2a, initial version was from 21.02.2008. Unfortunately it didn't get into mainline yet. I did not test it against 7.2a, but the feature does have its uses. Bram, are you willing to accept this patch? Is there something you want to see from the community before you consider adding it? I don't know. I can see it's somewhat useful, but it's also a yet another option thing. - Bram -- FIXME and XXX are two common keywords used to mark broken or incomplete code not only since XXX as a sex reference would grab everbodys attention but simply due to the fact that Vim would highlight these words. -- Hendrik Scholz /// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ ///sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org/// \\\help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org/// --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Vim Patches Project. [Was: updated 'relativenumber' patch]
On Sun, Jun 29, at 03:19 Bram Moolenaar wrote: Richard - On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 01:23, Markus Heidelberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have adapted my relativenumber patch to Vim 7.2a, initial version was from 21.02.2008. Unfortunately it didn't get into mainline yet. I did not test it against 7.2a, but the feature does have its uses. Bram, are you willing to accept this patch? Is there something you want to see from the community before you consider adding it? I don't know. I can see it's somewhat useful, but it's also a yet another option thing. Besides that it looks like a useful option, (with this chance) I would like to suggest a new project, with the simple purpose to gather or to link, to all those patches from different sources for different purposes and needs, that are not *yet* on the mainline or for some reasons they will never be. This will help: - to redirect people when looking for a feature that is not yet available in the mainline - to help Bram integrate a patch, when the patch is mature or there is a demand for it - to be easy to contribute for a (possible) better implementation or for a simple fix - to have a centralized place to all those patches, to help users extend their vim in various (sometimes unlimited) ways I know at least (besides Markus Heidelberg's relativenumber patch): [1] Vince Negri's Conseal patch [2] Bill McCArthy's Ben Schmidt's (some more math functions) [3] Konstantin Korikov's langmapmb (very useful in multibyte locales) [4] vimGdb [5] vimshell ... and I am sure there might be others. As a host I would suggest code google [6], as it has svn access, an issue tracker and a wiki. A link to this project from the official vim site, will be appropriate (with the usual warnings), although not strictly necessary. A link also from the vim wiki it seems natural. Just an idea. 1. http://vince.negri.googlepages.com/ 2. http://groups.google.com/group/vim_dev/browse_thread/thread/995aa20aac6b7bd4# 3. http://lostclus.linux.kiev.ua/Other_Works/Patches?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=vim71-langmapmb-4.patch http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/vim-multibyte/message/2232?l=1 4. http://clewn.sourceforge.net/ 5. http://www.wana.at/vimshell/ http://www.wogri.at/pipermail/vimshell/2007-August/000648.html 6. http://code.google.com/hosting/ Regards, Ag. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: [patch] fixed typos in help files
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 20:26:59 +, Dominique Pelle wrote: *** version7.txt 24 Jun 2008 22:33:14 - 1.217 --- version7.txt 25 Jun 2008 20:11:22 - *** *** 263,269 Ruby|ft-ruby-omni| SQL |ft-sql-omni| XML |ft-xml-omni| ! any language wih syntax highligting |ft-syntax-omni| You can add your own omni completion scripts. --- 263,269 Ruby|ft-ruby-omni| SQL |ft-sql-omni| XML |ft-xml-omni| ! any language with syntax highligting|ft-syntax-omni| Also notice that it should be 'highlighting'. Cheers, Adri --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Syntax highlighting through comment hash for sh
Pascal Christoph wrote: Hello you guys-making-the-most-useful-tool-in-VR (of course I am not speaking only of myself), proud to have found a little thing that, be fixed, would improve the improved vi even a nearly unsubstantial-tiny bit more: If you use syntax highlighting, and programm shell scripts, then there is a tiny misinterpretation, an issue with the comment-sign (hash) '#' : v98 of syntax/sh.vim has had this since mid-March; it may have been inserted earlier. Regards, Chip Campbell --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
