Couldn't get GVim maximum on KDE 4 , need help on debug it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I couldn't get gvim windows maximum on KDE4 , any ways to found the problem ? Actually i did a setup on kde's hot keys , and use some combinations to get a window maximum state. But this just don't work well for GVim , i won't occupy all the available space on my screen as other app does. Thanks ! - -- Best Regards, Aaron Lewis - PGP: 0xDFE6C29E Key Server: http://keyserver.veridis.com Finger Print: 9482 448F C7C3 896C 1DFE 7DD3 2492 A7D0 DFE6 C29E -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMz6jGAAoJECSSp9Df5sKetAoP/1XQ15F5Mz82NpNjXQ70tTAP /cU/fVhb10JMp+4odTqlQWEaTmFLsbjrUU8oR6rSAGRsPz+wmPjOvzFDgtXWvdxh 4kCLP9zpr202zMYsN71lgobnX+Ith+2BMq6H9rK89qzQ31uLjJ296rJaMzDWshB3 VP/dO3jqV0VIJHdi8tRaxB0Xp6aC+xa4xzEBfvF1aTI/OkAhBFQ8IDACA6JvIu8Q 70F6gMz/xhGc9nOEVgzleM5wRuzZUAlVQ3s8GUQSrG3m4KgZOQakGYcD0zFCj5Jg 5K5XMawDYZit9GReU7FyknuMRtvPNm+wiwL89inBm2/l17GvUpS6cByQOHkSDAGT KqhWL/B3YuoztUX/wJy+YHZi1T9IG9ML0wehAsr/9JhVIxHETZ84bJLkxRKhDPS2 BEkMPzx2UCj8W6oWsn+qyakkEpbzBikO+BXMIuzv7NbF0vc3TSJxud6tMDnQeM5j 4PHj9309z6AvmKkrL34t05xz7nqIJHFxoUyFwjhKpQ1wxX6GVsHbfDFdfK3rDKAE UjimLzWx3pIfe2TgzuFtIqrDqLD0YF+Qe9TdMe4p4g6a6NWbOvqGfHgkuTIVF8A8 tokuZgqdEsT/u4AGB6zuHlNQJpxdKNvxmwfJHDQFlT4lrGEKShhDr5yvMuHzAkhK Xk37BHEtUuJ8NyJe/4tl =jtaF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- You received this message from the vim_use maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: Using Bash in Vi mode. How to map keys?
In bash vi mode, one can press v and then get a full vim editor. Then you will have everything you need. Hope it helps, Eran. On 11/1/10, Tony Mechelynck antoine.mechely...@gmail.com wrote: On 01/11/10 19:23, aleCodd wrote: thanks for the reply. so what is the equivalent for the following: ino ( ()left using the readline module? I don't know. These are all bash questions, not Vim questions. Maybe a bash list or forum would be better than the Vim list. Have you read the bash manpage? and if you could please be more precise, is the readline library the only utility for mapping keys in bush? if yes, is there any interpreter i can use to convert Vim's mapping commands to readline commands? One other thing, is there a way to change the cursor shape and color - when running bash in vi mode - so that the shape and size of the cursor would be different for different modes (insert/normal), like the 't_SI' or 'guicursor' in vim/gvim..? no AFAIK, because bash is not a modal editor cheers alex Regards, Tony. -- The misnaming of fields of study is so common as to lead to what might be general systems laws. For example, Frank Harary once suggested the law that any field that had the word science in its name was guaranteed thereby not to be a science. He would cite as examples Military Science, Library Science, Political Science, Homemaking Science, Social Science, and Computer Science. Discuss the generality of this law, and possible reasons for its predictive power. -- Gerald Weinberg, An Introduction to General Systems Thinking. -- You received this message from the vim_use maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -- You received this message from the vim_use maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: Nice display of leading tabs
For tabs and trailing spaces I use those display settings along with the theme desert. To my taste it looks pretty cool, at least for development in Python. displaying tab characters and trailing spaces with special characters \u2592\u2591 and \u2593 set lcs=tab:▒░,trail:▓ set list -- You received this message from the vim_use maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: line number non copyable
Hello JohnS Thank you for your messages, I am already doing what you are suggesting (not using gvim though) Thanks for the insight Cheers -- View this message in context: http://vim.1045645.n5.nabble.com/line-number-non-copyable-tp3244877p3246342.html Sent from the Vim - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- You received this message from the vim_use maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: line number non copyable
Hi, I've written a plugin to solve this problem, see http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=2963 On 11月1日, 下午6时55分, statquant2 statqu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, silly question, is it possible to set the line numbers such that you cannot copy them ? I like to have the line number but I am fed up with having to set nonu each time I want to copy with the mouse. In most editors I know, line numbers are visible but you cannot copy them ... Hope I have been clear enough. Thanks for reading Cheers -- View this message in context:http://vim.1045645.n5.nabble.com/line-number-non-copyable-tp3244877p3... Sent from the Vim - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- You received this message from the vim_use maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: line number non copyable
Hi, I've written a plugin to solve this problem, see http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=2963 On 11月1日, 下午6时55分, statquant2 statqu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, silly question, is it possible to set the line numbers such that you cannot copy them ? I like to have the line number but I am fed up with having to set nonu each time I want to copy with the mouse. In most editors I know, line numbers are visible but you cannot copy them ... Hope I have been clear enough. Thanks for reading Cheers -- View this message in context:http://vim.1045645.n5.nabble.com/line-number-non-copyable-tp3244877p3... Sent from the Vim - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- You received this message from the vim_use maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
how to convert emacs-syntax file to vim-syntax file
Is there a simple way to convert a major emacs mode syntax file into an vim-syntax file? -- Johann Schatzer PGP key: 0x4212C694 -- You received this message from the vim_use maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: Using Bash in Vi mode. How to map keys?
Eran Borovik wrote: In bash vi mode, one can press v and then get a full vim editor. Then you will have everything you need. Hope it helps, Eran. I still have 2 problems with that, first i don't know how to submit the command back to bash after editing the command on vim, and second its really over the top, to switch back and forth between bash and vim for every single command. another problem im struggling now, is to find out what is the equivalent to :noremap in when binding keys in .inputrc for bash. I mean, sure you can bind the following: a:b but how do you bind: a:aa because this will not work because it will enter into an ENDLESS LOOP by remapping the 'a' character to itself... cheers alex -- View this message in context: http://vim.1045645.n5.nabble.com/Using-Bash-in-Vi-mode-How-to-map-keys-tp3245193p3246648.html Sent from the Vim - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- You received this message from the vim_use maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: Using Bash in Vi mode. How to map keys?
Reply to message «Re: Using Bash in Vi mode. How to map keys?»,
sent 15:40:29 02 November 2010, Tuesday
by aleCodd:
I still have 2 problems with that, first i don't know how to submit the
command back to bash after editing the command on vim, and second its
really over the top, to switch back and forth between bash and vim for
every single command.
another problem im struggling now, is to find out what is the equivalent to
:noremap in when binding keys in .inputrc for bash.
I mean, sure you can bind the following:
a:b
but how do you bind:
a:aa
because this will not work because it will enter into an ENDLESS LOOP by
remapping the 'a' character to itself...
Maybe you should try switching to zsh: its zle (z line editor) is highly
configurable. Though it does not have an equivalent to `noremap', you could
bind
keys to functions: your example could be written like that:
function _-ins-aa() { LBUFFER+=aa }
zle -N ins-aa _-ins-aa
bindkey a ins-aa
Not as obvious as `noremap a aa' (or `bindkey -s a aa' that results in ``zsh:
string inserting another one too many times'' error), but it works.
It also has a vi mode and I saw an answer on stackoverflow that explains how to
change prompt when switching from/to `normal' mode:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3622943/zsh-vi-mode-status-line (links in
this question are also useful). It looks like bash does not have such option.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Using Bash in Vi mode. How to map keys?
Hi ZyX! On Di, 02 Nov 2010, ZyX wrote: It also has a vi mode and I saw an answer on stackoverflow that explains how to change prompt when switching from/to `normal' mode: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3622943/zsh-vi-mode-status-line Here is another example: http://www.bewatermyfriend.org/posts/2010/08-08.21-16-02-computer.html regards, Christian -- You received this message from the vim_use maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: vim moving code block problem
On Nov 1, 4:51 am, John Beckett johnb.beck...@gmail.com wrote:
Zhanglistar wrote:
Vim manual says that to move to the start of the outer block
use the [[ command. But when I use [[, it jumps to the
head of file, which is a C program. And I when I use ]], it
jumps to the end of the C file.
Vim is not a compiler and it has no idea where functions start
and stop. Your code probably differs from the style expected by
Vim, my guess being that your '{' is not in the left margin (see
':help 29.3').
Vim does, however, have a decent idea where {..} pairs start and end.
So as a workaround you could probably use [] or ][ (which you say are
working} followed by %.
Or, you could use vaB to select the entire {..} block, then aB again
as needed until you have the entire function. Then switch back and
forth from end to end using o.
--
You received this message from the vim_use maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: Using Bash in Vi mode. How to map keys?
ZyX wrote:
Maybe you should try switching to zsh: its zle (z line editor) is highly
configurable. Though it does not have an equivalent to `noremap', you
could bind
keys to functions: your example could be written like that:
function _-ins-aa() { LBUFFER+=aa }
zle -N ins-aa _-ins-aa
bindkey a ins-aa
Not as obvious as `noremap a aa' (or `bindkey -s a aa' that results in
``zsh:
string inserting another one too many times'' error), but it works.
Can I be more specific?
I want to bind in bash something equivalent to:
:inoremap left
Now, this mapping is so common that i'm sure that millions of people have
tried it before me (for Bash), so would you say that still there is NO WAY
that i can bind the above in .inputrc for bash?
--
View this message in context:
http://vim.1045645.n5.nabble.com/Using-Bash-in-Vi-mode-How-to-map-keys-tp3245193p3246832.html
Sent from the Vim - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
You received this message from the vim_use maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: Using Bash in Vi mode. How to map keys?
Reply to message «Re: Using Bash in Vi mode. How to map keys?»,
sent 17:47:30 02 November 2010, Tuesday
by aleCodd:
Can I be more specific?
I want to bind in bash something equivalent to:
:inoremap left
Now, this mapping is so common that i'm sure that millions of people have
tried it before me (for Bash), so would you say that still there is NO WAY
that i can bind the above in .inputrc for bash?
I use «,s», «,f», «,u», «,h», «,» «,'» for «()», «{}», «», «[]», «», «''»
respectively. Having «» mapped to «» is very annoying when I do not need to
have two double strokes what is common. And having to type symbols from the top
row even without shift (programmer dvorak) is inconvinient.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
wm and tw cause formatting problem
In insert mode, if a line starts with - the next line is indented. This is not what I want. After a lot of experimenting, I found that it was because either textwidth or wrapmargin was set to a non-zero value. Is there any way to get round this? I do need to set textwidth but I don't want to have to keep correcting lines with initial -. -- Anthony Campbell - a...@acampbell.org.uk Microsoft-free zone - Using Debian GNU/Linux http://www.acampbell.org.uk - sample my ebooks at http://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/acampbell -- You received this message from the vim_use maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: Using Bash in Vi mode. How to map keys?
ZyX wrote:
I use «,s», «,f», «,u», «,h», «,» «,'» for «()», «{}», «», «[]», «»,
«''»
respectively. Having «» mapped to «» is very annoying when I do not
need to
have two double strokes what is common. And having to type symbols from
the top
row even without shift (programmer dvorak) is inconvinient.
hmm...what do you mean by 's' ?
can you please explain 1)what key do you bind 2)and how is it done in
.inputrc
cheers
--
View this message in context:
http://vim.1045645.n5.nabble.com/Using-Bash-in-Vi-mode-How-to-map-keys-tp3245193p3246958.html
Sent from the Vim - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
You received this message from the vim_use maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: Using Bash in Vi mode. How to map keys?
Reply to message «Re: Using Bash in Vi mode. How to map keys?»,
sent 19:15:44 02 November 2010, Tuesday
by aleCodd:
hmm...what do you mean by 's' ?
Do not use google groups, it fucks up unicode symbols. It is was a ``,s''
enclosed in \u00ab and \u00bb (left and right double angle quotation
marks),
googlegroups turn them into and . In zshrc I have the following code:
bindkey -M evi,h ins-brackets
...
bindkey -M evi,S ins-parentheses-escaped
where all ins-* are custom zle widgets. It is not the right place to discuss
their implementation, but here is similar code from my vimrc:
inoremap ,ef C-oI{C-mC-oo}C-oO
inoremap ,eFC-m{C-mC-oo}C-oO
inoremap ,F {C-oo}C-oO
inoremap ,f {}C-\C-oh
inoremap ,h []C-\C-oh
inoremap ,s ()C-\C-oh
inoremap ,uLTC-\C-oh
inoremap ,es (C-\C-oEC-oa)C-\C-oh
inoremap ,H [[::]]C-oF:
inoremap ,eh[::]C-oF:
inoremap ,q «»C-\C-oh
inoremap ,Q „“C-\C-oh
inoremap ,eq “”C-\C-oh
inoremap ,eQ ‘’C-\C-oh
inoremap , C-\C-oh
inoremap ,' ''C-\C-oh
Note that `,q', `,Q', `,eq' and `,eQ' lines will probably be also fucked up by
googlegroups, so it is better to view this message somewhere else, perhaps in a
mail client.
Here is from ipythonrc. Ipython uses readline, so it should be easy to port it
to .inputrc:
readline_parse_and_bind ,s: ()\C-b
other lines are similar.
can you please explain 1)what key do you bind 2)and how is it done in
.inputrc
I am using zsh, so nothing is done in inputrc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Using Bash in Vi mode. How to map keys?
thanks so much just for curiosity, why do you have in the last 5 or so commands the c-/, why is not the c-o enough to enter a normal mode command before returning to insert mode.. and just to make sure, bindkey is a zsh command, and if so how do you rate zsh vs. bash when it comes to command line editing, which is more vi-like configurable? -- View this message in context: http://vim.1045645.n5.nabble.com/Using-Bash-in-Vi-mode-How-to-map-keys-tp3245193p3247044.html Sent from the Vim - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- You received this message from the vim_use maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: BS and set list problem
thanks for help.
What does Vim answer to
:verbose set list? listchars? lazyredraw?
:if !has('gui_running') | verbose set t_kb? t_kD? | endif
and what appears if (in Insert or Command-line mode) you hit Ctrl-
V (or Ctrl-Q if you use Ctrl-V to paste into Vim) followed by
Backspace?
:verbose set list? listchars? lazyredraw?
set list listchars=eol:$ nolazyredraw
if !has('gui_running') | verbose set t_kb? t_kD? |endif
t_kb? BSt_kD? DEL
Ctrl-Q followed by Backspace BS
:set backspace? backspace=indent,start,eol
this seems that all these options were default ?
but it seems that the backspace didn't work properly when i : set
list (i didn't change listchars)
for instance
i type FOUR hardtabs in a new line
it appears as ^I^I^I^I and then i just type ONE BS, these four
tabs were deleted
but when i :set listchars=tab:\ \ or someothers or :set nolist it
works properly just as i wanted,i.e. these tabs were deleted after i
type FOUR BS
o, i think that maybe BS just delete the display tabstop
characters a time.
thus it will delete 8 chars and ^I^I^I^I is 8 chars,so it was
deleted
or other reasons?
Best regards
itx
On 11月2日, 上午3时34分, Tony Mechelynck antoine.mechely...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 01/11/10 17:08, itx wrote:
when i set list and then type four tab in a newline like
\t\t\t\t
when iset list, i type backspce for juse one time
this four tabs were delete ,
but when i set nolist ,i works well
why
my settings
set tabstop=8
set noexpandtab
set backspace=indent,eol,start
If you :set list, and 'listchars' is unset, every hard tab you type
should appeat as ^I
If you :set list, and 'listchars' has a properly set tab: subentry,
then that should be used to display hard tabs. To display them as
spasces, use for instance
:set list listchars=tab:\ \ ,eol:$
(two backslash-escaped spaces: see :help option-backslash ).
In both cases, the backspace ought to work properly...
What does Vim answer to
:verbose set list? listchars? lazyredraw?
:if !has('gui_running') | verbose set t_kb? t_kD? | endif
and what appears if (in Insert or Command-line mode) you hit Ctrl-V (or
Ctrl-Q if you use Ctrl-V to paste into Vim) followed by Backspace?
Best regards,
Tony.
--
Eternal nothingness is fine if you happen to be dressed for it.
-- Woody Allen
--
You received this message from the vim_use maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: Using Bash in Vi mode. How to map keys?
Reply to message «Re: Using Bash in Vi mode. How to map keys?», sent 19:57:06 02 November 2010, Tuesday by aleCodd: just for curiosity, why do you have in the last 5 or so commands the c-/, why is not the c-o enough to enter a normal mode command before returning to insert mode.. Because it moves one character left at the end of line and does not move anything in the middle. and just to make sure, bindkey is a zsh command, and if so how do you rate zsh vs. bash when it comes to command line editing, which is more vi-like configurable? While you are using zsh, you can configure almost anything. I do not know how to bind a key to a custom function that does something with the command line, but I do not say that this is impossible: I switched to zsh when I had three aliases, two binds and no functions in my bashrc, so I do not have enough experience in configuring bash. In zsh I do not use normal/insert modes, but have some vim- like keybindings: C-o that can execute some commands in «normal» mode, C-r*, a bunch of «,*» mappings. If you want to compare, try asking on stackoverflow how to imitate vim's C-o in bash while having a emacs keys, based on those answers I could yield more useful comparison. I also know, that in zsh you may setup as many modes as you want: that indicator was based onto the fact that zsh was changing its keymap when moving between vicmd/viins, so it is not something hard-coded like in bash. In some recent topics discussed on zsh mailing list there was an experimental implementation of dynamic higlighting (though it was capable almost only for higlighting command as alias/command/builtin/function). Can you imagine something like that implemented without patching in bash? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Using Bash in Vi mode. How to map keys?
ZyX wrote: Reply to message «Re: Using Bash in Vi mode. How to map keys?», sent 19:57:06 02 November 2010, Tuesday by aleCodd: just for curiosity, why do you have in the last 5 or so commands the c-/, why is not the c-o enough to enter a normal mode command before returning to insert mode.. Because it moves one character left at the end of line and does not move anything in the middle. what do you mean by that? c-o waits for a command and reenters insert mode, but where does it MOVE? and just to make sure, bindkey is a zsh command, and if so how do you rate zsh vs. bash when it comes to command line editing, which is more vi-like configurable? While you are using zsh, you can configure almost anything. I do not know how to bind a key to a custom function that does something with the command line, but I do not say that this is impossible: I switched to zsh when I had three aliases, two binds and no functions in my bashrc, so I do not have enough experience in configuring bash. In zsh I do not use normal/insert modes, but have some vim- like keybindings: C-o that can execute some commands in «normal» mode, C-r*, a bunch of «,*» mappings. If you want to compare, try asking on stackoverflow how to imitate vim's C-o in bash while having a emacs keys, based on those answers I could yield more useful comparison. I also know, that in zsh you may setup as many modes as you want: that indicator was based onto the fact that zsh was changing its keymap when moving between vicmd/viins, so it is not something hard-coded like in bash. In some recent topics discussed on zsh mailing list there was an experimental implementation of dynamic higlighting (though it was capable almost only for higlighting command as alias/command/builtin/function). Can you imagine something like that implemented without patching in bash? really appreciate your detailed explanation, so i guess immigrating to zsh land will make things easier in the end, too bad that it will take another month or so to get used to it with all its commands etc. -- View this message in context: http://vim.1045645.n5.nabble.com/Using-Bash-in-Vi-mode-How-to-map-keys-tp3245193p3247173.html Sent from the Vim - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- You received this message from the vim_use maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: Using Bash in Vi mode. How to map keys?
Reply to message «Re: Using Bash in Vi mode. How to map keys?», sent 19:57:06 02 November 2010, Tuesday by aleCodd: just for curiosity, why do you have in the last 5 or so commands the c-/, why is not the c-o enough to enter a normal mode command before returning to insert mode.. Because it moves one character left at the end of line and does not move anything in the middle. unquote what do you mean by that? c-o waits for a command and reenters insert mode, but where does it MOVE? and just to make sure, bindkey is a zsh command, and if so how do you rate zsh vs. bash when it comes to command line editing, which is more vi-like configurable? While you are using zsh, you can configure almost anything. I do not know how to bind a key to a custom function that does something with the command line, but I do not say that this is impossible: I switched to zsh when I had three aliases, two binds and no functions in my bashrc, so I do not have enough experience in configuring bash. In zsh I do not use normal/insert modes, but have some vim- like keybindings: C-o that can execute some commands in «normal» mode, C-r*, a bunch of «,*» mappings. If you want to compare, try asking on stackoverflow how to imitate vim's C-o in bash while having a emacs keys, based on those answers I could yield more useful comparison. I also know, that in zsh you may setup as many modes as you want: that indicator was based onto the fact that zsh was changing its keymap when moving between vicmd/viins, so it is not something hard-coded like in bash. In some recent topics discussed on zsh mailing list there was an experimental implementation of dynamic higlighting (though it was capable almost only for higlighting command as alias/command/builtin/function). Can you imagine something like that implemented without patching in bash? unquote really appreciate your detailed explanation, so i guess immigrating to zsh land will make things easier in the end, too bad that it will take another month or so to get used to it with all its commands etc. -- View this message in context: http://vim.1045645.n5.nabble.com/Using-Bash-in-Vi-mode-How-to-map-keys-tp3245193p3247177.html Sent from the Vim - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- You received this message from the vim_use maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: BS and set list problem
On 02/11/10 18:39, itx wrote:
thanks for help.
What does Vim answer to
:verbose set list? listchars? lazyredraw?
:if !has('gui_running') | verbose set t_kb? t_kD? | endif
and what appears if (in Insert or Command-line mode) you hit Ctrl-
V (or Ctrl-Q if you use Ctrl-V to paste into Vim) followed by
Backspace?
:verbose set list? listchars? lazyredraw?
set list listchars=eol:$ nolazyredraw
if !has('gui_running') | verbose set t_kb? t_kD? |endif
t_kb?BS t_kD?DEL
Ctrl-Q followed by BackspaceBS
:set backspace? backspace=indent,start,eol
this seems that all these options were default ?
but it seems that the backspace didn't work properly when i : set
list (i didn't change listchars)
for instance
i type FOUR hardtabs in a new line
it appears as ^I^I^I^I and then i just type ONEBS, these four
tabs were deleted
but when i :set listchars=tab:\ \ or someothers or :set nolist it
works properly just as i wanted,i.e. these tabs were deleted after i
type FOURBS
o, i think that maybeBS just delete the display tabstop
characters a time.
thus it will delete 8 chars and ^I^I^I^I is 8 chars,so it was
deleted
or other reasons?
Best regards
itx
I don't know: I couldn't reproduce your symptoms (in gvim with GTK2 GUI
on Linux).
- What platform are you using? Windows? Mac? Linux? Other(which)?
- You seem to be using Console Vim: in which terminal? Windows console?
Mac Terminal.app? Linux(text)? xterm? konsole? mlterm? gnome-terminal?
other(which)?
Best regards,
Tony.
--
If you explain so clearly that nobody can misunderstand, somebody
will.
--
You received this message from the vim_use maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: Using Bash in Vi mode. How to map keys?
On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, aleCodd wrote: Reply to message «Re: Using Bash in Vi mode. How to map keys?», sent 19:57:06 02 November 2010, Tuesday by aleCodd: just for curiosity, why do you have in the last 5 or so commands the c-/, why is not the c-o enough to enter a normal mode command before returning to insert mode.. Because it moves one character left at the end of line and does not move anything in the middle. unquote what do you mean by that? c-o waits for a command and reenters insert mode, but where does it MOVE? From :help i_CTRL-\_CTRL-O The CTRL-O command sometimes has a side effect: If the cursor was beyond the end of the line, it will be put on the last character in the line. In mappings it's often better to use Esc (first put an x in the text, Esc will then always put the cursor on it). Or use CTRL-\ CTRL-O, but then beware of the cursor possibly being beyond the end of the line. -- Best, Ben -- You received this message from the vim_use maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: Using Bash in Vi mode. How to map keys?
Reply to message «Re: Using Bash in Vi mode. How to map keys?»,
sent 21:15:14 02 November 2010, Tuesday
by aleCodd:
what do you mean by that? c-o waits for a command and reenters insert
mode, but where does it MOVE?
Just try it while at the end of non-empty line and see where cursor moves.
Don't
you think that there is some purpose of existance of C-\C-o alongside with
C-o?
really appreciate your detailed explanation, so i guess immigrating to
zsh land will make things easier in the end, too bad that it will take
another month or so to get used to it with all its commands etc.
Zsh has reasonable wizard that creates initial zshrc and does not require much
time to get used to it if you are already familiar with bash. Most of bash
functions will work in zsh as well, but you will need to rewrite prompt and
bindings (it looks like they can not invoke any functions so it is easy with
``binkey -s'').
It also has some very useful modules: zpty (an analog of expect), zmv
(rename/copy/link files); ttyctl (restores tty settings after application
exited
or crashed), PCRE regex support, hooks for everything, globbing flags (capable
of replacing `find' and any `find | ... | xargs ...' pipe, though with some
perfomance penalty), parameter expansion flags (for example, escaping a string
stored in a variable no more requires sed, just ${(qqq)VAR}), highly
configurable completion... Just start using and you'll never want to switch
back.
PS: It was hard to find where is the text you wrote.
PPS: Most of the message is an offtopic here.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: wm and tw cause formatting problem
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 04:03:51PM +, Anthony Campbell wrote: In insert mode, if a line starts with - the next line is indented. This is not what I want. After a lot of experimenting, I found that it was because either textwidth or wrapmargin was set to a non-zero value. Is there any way to get round this? I do need to set textwidth but I don't want to have to keep correcting lines with initial -. This could be caused by the 'formatoptions' setting, check :h 'formatoptions' and :h fo-table for more information. Hope this helps, Simon -- + privacy is necessary + using gnupg http://gnupg.org + public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9 pgp7jD4D7D9MM.pgp Description: PGP signature
How to eliminate $- from php words
using vim huge version with GTK2 GUI on ubuntu 10.04 I mean to eliminate the following characters: '$' , '-', and '' (ascii 36,45,62) from php word syntax. Neither :setlocal iskeyword-=$- as an ex command nor autocmd BufRead,BufNewFile *.php setlocal iskeyword-=$- in .vimrc has the effects that I am looking for. to test my efforts I invoke : set iskeyword and see the following :iskeyword=38,42,43,45,47-58,60-62,64-90,97-122,_, where ascii 45 and 62 are still present. What am I doing wrong? thanks -- Tim tim at johnsons-web.com or akwebsoft.com http://www.akwebsoft.com -- You received this message from the vim_use maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: How to eliminate $- from php words
On Tuesday 02 November 2010 18:48:30 Tim Johnson wrote: using vim huge version with GTK2 GUI on ubuntu 10.04 I mean to eliminate the following characters: '$' , '-', and '' (ascii 36,45,62) from php word syntax. Neither :setlocal iskeyword-=$- as an ex command nor autocmd BufRead,BufNewFile *.php setlocal iskeyword-=$- in .vimrc has the effects that I am looking for. to test my efforts I invoke : set iskeyword and see the following :iskeyword=38,42,43,45,47-58,60-62,64-90,97-122,_, where ascii 45 and 62 are still present. What am I doing wrong? first, test my theory by testing iskeyword with :verbose set iskeyword? then, if i'm right, create a ~/.vim/after/syntax/php.vim ok, scratch that -- i just looked and php.vim does not tamper with iskeyword -- perhaps you have a plugin installed that is setting it -- so tell us what you see when you do the verbose query sc -- You received this message from the vim_use maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: How to eliminate $- from php words
* sc tooth...@swbell.net [101102 16:20]: On Tuesday 02 November 2010 18:48:30 Tim Johnson wrote: . first, test my theory by testing iskeyword with :verbose set iskeyword? .. ok, scratch that -- i just looked and php.vim does not tamper with iskeyword -- perhaps you have a plugin installed that is setting it -- so tell us what you see when you do the verbose query Here you go... iskeyword=38,42,43,45,47-58,60-62,64-90,97-122,_, And I don't recall the vim command to list out plugins, but If I invoke the following: gvim --noplugin hello.php and then run :verbose set iskeyword? I get iskeyword=@,48-57,_,192-255 Last set from ~/.vimrc and you are correct: A plugin is doing it. And which is it? -- Tim tim at johnsons-web.com or akwebsoft.com http://www.akwebsoft.com -- You received this message from the vim_use maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: How to eliminate $- from php words
On Tuesday 02 November 2010 19:51:49 Tim Johnson wrote: * sc tooth...@swbell.net [101102 16:20]: On Tuesday 02 November 2010 18:48:30 Tim Johnson wrote: . first, test my theory by testing iskeyword with :verbose set iskeyword? .. ok, scratch that -- i just looked and php.vim does not tamper with iskeyword -- perhaps you have a plugin installed that is setting it -- so tell us what you see when you do the verbose query Here you go... iskeyword=38,42,43,45,47-58,60-62,64-90,97-122,_, And I don't recall the vim command to list out plugins, but If I invoke the following: gvim --noplugin hello.php and then run :verbose set iskeyword? I get iskeyword=@,48-57,_,192-255 Last set from ~/.vimrc and you are correct: A plugin is doing it. And which is it? the verbose query will tell you, by providing a Last set from line -- you have not shown us that, you've only shared the verbose query from your --noplugin session sc -- You received this message from the vim_use maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: How to eliminate $- from php words
* sc tooth...@swbell.net [101102 17:11]: On Tuesday 02 November 2010 19:51:49 Tim Johnson wrote: the verbose query will tell you, by providing a Last set from line -- you have not shown us that, you've only shared the verbose query from your --noplugin session I apologize for the oversight. I think the problem was coming from my session file. I have placed the following: setlocal iskeyword=@,48-57,_,192-255 in ~/.vim/after/syntax/php.vim As well, I ran the command above from ex, and then saved my session file. Thanks for getting me on track here. I think I have the solution. cheers -- Tim tim at johnsons-web.com or akwebsoft.com http://www.akwebsoft.com -- You received this message from the vim_use maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: BS and set list problem
2010/11/3 Tony Mechelynck antoine.mechely...@gmail.com
On 02/11/10 18:39, itx wrote:
thanks for help.
What does Vim answer to
:verbose set list? listchars? lazyredraw?
:if !has('gui_running') | verbose set t_kb? t_kD? | endif
and what appears if (in Insert or Command-line mode) you hit Ctrl-
V (or Ctrl-Q if you use Ctrl-V to paste into Vim) followed by
Backspace?
:verbose set list? listchars? lazyredraw?
set list listchars=eol:$ nolazyredraw
if !has('gui_running') | verbose set t_kb? t_kD? |endif
t_kb?BS t_kD?DEL
Ctrl-Q followed by BackspaceBS
:set backspace? backspace=indent,start,eol
this seems that all these options were default ?
but it seems that the backspace didn't work properly when i : set
list (i didn't change listchars)
for instance
i type FOUR hardtabs in a new line
it appears as ^I^I^I^I and then i just type ONEBS, these four
tabs were deleted
but when i :set listchars=tab:\ \ or someothers or :set nolist it
works properly just as i wanted,i.e. these tabs were deleted after i
type FOURBS
o, i think that maybeBS just delete the display tabstop
characters a time.
thus it will delete 8 chars and ^I^I^I^I is 8 chars,so it was
deleted
or other reasons?
Best regards
itx
I don't know: I couldn't reproduce your symptoms (in gvim with GTK2 GUI on
Linux).
- What platform are you using? Windows? Mac? Linux? Other(which)?
- You seem to be using Console Vim: in which terminal? Windows console? Mac
Terminal.app? Linux(text)? xterm? konsole? mlterm? gnome-terminal?
other(which)?
Best regards,
Tony.
--
If you explain so clearly that nobody can misunderstand, somebody
will.
sorry for that i forgot to list the settings when i do the test.
:set ts=8
:set sts=8
:set noet
er, I was using gvim 7.2( offical version ) on windowsXP . To get the
settings of t_kb and t_kD, i run vim in the windows console, and they
all have the same symptoms.
Best regards,
itx.
--
You received this message from the vim_use maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: How to eliminate $- from php words
On Nov 3, 12:48 pm, Tim Johnson t...@johnsons-web.com wrote: :setlocal iskeyword-=$- What am I doing wrong? (I see others are getting you where you want to go, but they didn't answer this question directly). That'll never work, for at least two reasons. 1. iskeyword is a comma separated list of items. The above attempts to remove one item $-. 2. Even if the setting of iskeyword had separate items for $, -, and , unless they appear in the setting *in that order* :set -= would not remove them; one has to remove them one at a time. F.ex., :set isk=a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j :set isk-=b,c works, b,c is found :set isk-=e,g doesn't work silently :set isk-=e isk-=gworks 3. :set doesn't have the intelligence to convert to ascii, say a minus to 62. 4. :set doesn't have the intelligence to split up 60-62 into 60,61,62 then remove the 62. You can see that :set has some general mechanisms for setting options, but no smarts for a particular option... though I'd not be surprised if there are exceptions to that. Regards, John -- You received this message from the vim_use maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
