Craig A. Berry wrote:
On May 10, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Dave Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 08:52:54PM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
Craig A. Berry wrote:
With a -Duseithreads build using HP C V7.3-018 on OpenVMS IA64
V8.3-1H1, I get:
ext/Cwd/t/cwd.FAILED at
test 23
lib/Archive/Extract/t/01_Archive-Extract..FAILED at
test 74
lib/CPANPLUS/Dist/Build/t/02_CPANPLUS-Dist-Build..FAILED at
test 11
lib/CPANPLUS/t/19_CPANPLUS-Dist...FAILED at
test 62
lib/ExtUtils/t/basic..FAILED--expected
81 tests, saw 84
lib/Module/Build/t/compat.FAILED at
test 22
lib/Module/Build/t/extFAILED at
test 142
Failed 7 tests out of 1560, 99.55% okay.
This is identical to blead except for the Cwd test, which succeeds in
blead.
The next step is digging around in all the relevant RT queues to see
what's already been fixed but not brought into the core yet.
As of blead 2009-04-25.23.16:08, with the patches that I have previously
submitted, I only have the two CPANPLUS tests failing.
Are these previously-submitted patches yet to be applied to blead, and if
so, is that due to waiting on upstream maintainers?
I think there's a mix. If there is more than a screenful of smoke, or
something I know about has been languishing in an RT queue a long time,
I may apply it to blead, but otherwise I wait for upstream. I don't
know offhand which patches John is referring to or what queues they are
in. I hope to find time to research that soon but can't make any promises.
I'm about to try a maint-5.10 build again and see where the PathTools
integration got us.
The basic.t and ext.t have been applied to CPAN but apparently have not
made it into blead yet.
I am not sure about the compat.t issue, I do not show a different
compat.t than blead.
I am not showing any differences in my code to the last time I synced
with blead for Archive::Tar.
I have not been updating my local setup as I am trying to find out what
is causing the access violation in SV.C first. I do not know if I can
find it before the Dayton Hamfest.
-John
wb8...@qsl.net
Personal Opinion Only
