Posted by David Kopel:
W.V. Court Vindicates Self-defense Right for Employees: 
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2005_06_05-2005_06_11.shtml#1118499071


   In [1]Feliciano v. 7-Eleven, a masked woman with a gun attempted to
   rob the 7-Eleven where Feliciano worked. While the robber was
   distracted by another employee, Feliciano grabbed her gun, and held
   her captive until the police arrived. "Following this incident,
   7-Eleven terminated Feliciano, who was an at will employee, for
   failure to comply with its company policy which prohibits employees
   from subduing or otherwise interfering with a store robbery."
   The West Virginia Supreme Court cited numerous precedents showing that
   the right of self-defense is very well-established and substantial
   public policy. Accordingly:

     we hold that when an at will employee has been discharged from
     his/her employment based upon his/her exercise of self-defense in
     response to lethal imminent danger, such right of self-defense
     constitutes a substantial public policy exception to the at will
     employment doctrine and will sustain a cause of action for wrongful
     discharge. Consistent with our prior precedent, we hold further
     that an employer may rebut an employee's prima facie case of
     wrongful discharge resulting from the employee's use of
     self-defense in response to lethal imminent danger by demonstrating
     that it had a plausible and legitimate business reason to justify
     the discharge.

References

   1. http://www.state.wv.us/wvsca/docs/fall01/29564.htm

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
Volokh@lists.powerblogs.com
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to