Re: [volt-nuts] Drifting 3458As
If you are confident that the 732A is stable to 0.1ppm then just run an acal afer a wek, and determnine what has driifted. Your A/D board, as can be seen with a drifty cal constant, or, els the A9 ref. Dont do a checl everyday. this hides information. > Gesendet: Freitag, 01. Dezember 2017 um 19:49 Uhr > Von: "Randy Evans" <randyevans2...@gmail.com> > An: "Discussion of precise voltage measurement" <volt-nuts@febo.com> > Betreff: Re: [volt-nuts] Drifting 3458As > > I am running the ACAL to check cal constant drift over several times a day > and over a 7 day period (per SN18). The varying times of the day are to > see how temperature sensitivity affects the cal constant drift since the > room temperature is not constant through the day but is relatively constant > at the same time of day each day; i.e., the furnace is off during the night > so mornings are about 5 degrees C cooler than the afternoon. Even after > ACAL, I am seeing up to an absolute difference of 3.5 uV on the 732A > voltage reading between the HP and Agilent 3458As, depending on the time of > day. I suspect the A9 board in the Agilent is the reason since the HP > 3458A reads much closer to the 732A value than the Agilent 3458A over > temperature. Based on long term comparisons with other 732As and a 732B, I > am confident the 732A is stable within 0.1uV. > > I am using an ebay A9 board in the Agilent 3458A for the current testing > since I suspect the original A9 board in the Agilent 3458A. I am > separately testing the original A9 board since I am not completely > confident in the ebay A9 board. I do not have enough data to draw a > conclusion yet about the original A9 board. My current concern is to see > if there is agreement that the A9 board is likely the culprit. > > Thanks, > > Randy Evans > > On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 1:58 AM, <acb...@gmx.de> wrote: > > > What you describe (A9 drift) would be the explanation. However question is > > how much you see. The A9 should not drift much in the intervals you talk > > about (days). > > Also, you should run the ACAL to determine the cal constant not several > > times a day but with several days inbetween, and then divide by number of > > days to determin drift > > Frequent ACAL may not give you good results (random fluctuations such as > > noise, temp... and their impact during cal gets higher the shorter the time > > between ACALs) > > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. November 2017 um 07:40 Uhr > > > Von: "Randy Evans" <randyevans2...@gmail.com> > > > An: "Discussion of precise voltage measurement" <volt-nuts@febo.com> > > > Betreff: [volt-nuts] Drifting 3458As > > > > > > I have been testing two 3458As against a known good Fluke 732A. Each > > 3458A > > > was calibrated for DCV before the start of the measurements so they both > > > started at the same point. I have been running a series of tests > > > consisting of measuring the Cal Constant as detailed in Service Note 18 > > for > > > each meter several times a day (to calculate the drift per the procedure > > in > > > SN 18). I also measure the 732A voltage in each meter each time using > > NLPC > > > 100 and NRDGS 100 and then recording the STDEV, MEAN, MAX, and MIN > > values. > > > What I have observed is that the Cal Constant is acceptably low but the > > > MEAN value per measurement is drifting up in one meter and drifting down > > > in the other. The unit drifting down has a new A3 board installed and > > the > > > unit drifting upward is an Agilent 3458A only a few years old so would > > not > > > be expected to have a drifting A3 board. It was only calibrated 1 time > > per > > > the internal REV number, so would have likely been re-calibrated if the > > A3 > > > board was replaced. > > > > > > > > > My question is what is the likely cause of the drift in the MEAN voltage > > > reading if the Cal Constant value is relatively constant? SN 18 says the > > > drift rate of the Cal Constant is an indication of drift in the A3 AD > > > board, but I believe it assumes the A9 voltage ref board has a constant > > > value over time. If this is not true (e;g., the voltage ref is > > drifting), > > > I think this would explain the drift in the voltage reading even though > > the > > > Cal Constant is relatively constant. Any opinions on this? > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > Randy Evans > > >
Re: [volt-nuts] Drifting 3458As
I am running the ACAL to check cal constant drift over several times a day and over a 7 day period (per SN18). The varying times of the day are to see how temperature sensitivity affects the cal constant drift since the room temperature is not constant through the day but is relatively constant at the same time of day each day; i.e., the furnace is off during the night so mornings are about 5 degrees C cooler than the afternoon. Even after ACAL, I am seeing up to an absolute difference of 3.5 uV on the 732A voltage reading between the HP and Agilent 3458As, depending on the time of day. I suspect the A9 board in the Agilent is the reason since the HP 3458A reads much closer to the 732A value than the Agilent 3458A over temperature. Based on long term comparisons with other 732As and a 732B, I am confident the 732A is stable within 0.1uV. I am using an ebay A9 board in the Agilent 3458A for the current testing since I suspect the original A9 board in the Agilent 3458A. I am separately testing the original A9 board since I am not completely confident in the ebay A9 board. I do not have enough data to draw a conclusion yet about the original A9 board. My current concern is to see if there is agreement that the A9 board is likely the culprit. Thanks, Randy Evans On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 1:58 AM, <acb...@gmx.de> wrote: > What you describe (A9 drift) would be the explanation. However question is > how much you see. The A9 should not drift much in the intervals you talk > about (days). > Also, you should run the ACAL to determine the cal constant not several > times a day but with several days inbetween, and then divide by number of > days to determin drift > Frequent ACAL may not give you good results (random fluctuations such as > noise, temp... and their impact during cal gets higher the shorter the time > between ACALs) > > > > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. November 2017 um 07:40 Uhr > > Von: "Randy Evans" <randyevans2...@gmail.com> > > An: "Discussion of precise voltage measurement" <volt-nuts@febo.com> > > Betreff: [volt-nuts] Drifting 3458As > > > > I have been testing two 3458As against a known good Fluke 732A. Each > 3458A > > was calibrated for DCV before the start of the measurements so they both > > started at the same point. I have been running a series of tests > > consisting of measuring the Cal Constant as detailed in Service Note 18 > for > > each meter several times a day (to calculate the drift per the procedure > in > > SN 18). I also measure the 732A voltage in each meter each time using > NLPC > > 100 and NRDGS 100 and then recording the STDEV, MEAN, MAX, and MIN > values. > > What I have observed is that the Cal Constant is acceptably low but the > > MEAN value per measurement is drifting up in one meter and drifting down > > in the other. The unit drifting down has a new A3 board installed and > the > > unit drifting upward is an Agilent 3458A only a few years old so would > not > > be expected to have a drifting A3 board. It was only calibrated 1 time > per > > the internal REV number, so would have likely been re-calibrated if the > A3 > > board was replaced. > > > > > > My question is what is the likely cause of the drift in the MEAN voltage > > reading if the Cal Constant value is relatively constant? SN 18 says the > > drift rate of the Cal Constant is an indication of drift in the A3 AD > > board, but I believe it assumes the A9 voltage ref board has a constant > > value over time. If this is not true (e;g., the voltage ref is > drifting), > > I think this would explain the drift in the voltage reading even though > the > > Cal Constant is relatively constant. Any opinions on this? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Randy Evans > > ___ > > volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com > > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ > mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > > ___ > volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ > mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > ___ volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [volt-nuts] Drifting 3458As
What you describe (A9 drift) would be the explanation. However question is how much you see. The A9 should not drift much in the intervals you talk about (days). Also, you should run the ACAL to determine the cal constant not several times a day but with several days inbetween, and then divide by number of days to determin drift Frequent ACAL may not give you good results (random fluctuations such as noise, temp... and their impact during cal gets higher the shorter the time between ACALs) > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. November 2017 um 07:40 Uhr > Von: "Randy Evans" <randyevans2...@gmail.com> > An: "Discussion of precise voltage measurement" <volt-nuts@febo.com> > Betreff: [volt-nuts] Drifting 3458As > > I have been testing two 3458As against a known good Fluke 732A. Each 3458A > was calibrated for DCV before the start of the measurements so they both > started at the same point. I have been running a series of tests > consisting of measuring the Cal Constant as detailed in Service Note 18 for > each meter several times a day (to calculate the drift per the procedure in > SN 18). I also measure the 732A voltage in each meter each time using NLPC > 100 and NRDGS 100 and then recording the STDEV, MEAN, MAX, and MIN values. > What I have observed is that the Cal Constant is acceptably low but the > MEAN value per measurement is drifting up in one meter and drifting down > in the other. The unit drifting down has a new A3 board installed and the > unit drifting upward is an Agilent 3458A only a few years old so would not > be expected to have a drifting A3 board. It was only calibrated 1 time per > the internal REV number, so would have likely been re-calibrated if the A3 > board was replaced. > > > My question is what is the likely cause of the drift in the MEAN voltage > reading if the Cal Constant value is relatively constant? SN 18 says the > drift rate of the Cal Constant is an indication of drift in the A3 AD > board, but I believe it assumes the A9 voltage ref board has a constant > value over time. If this is not true (e;g., the voltage ref is drifting), > I think this would explain the drift in the voltage reading even though the > Cal Constant is relatively constant. Any opinions on this? > > > Thanks, > > > Randy Evans > ___ > volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > ___ volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts and follow the instructions there.
[volt-nuts] Drifting 3458As
I have been testing two 3458As against a known good Fluke 732A. Each 3458A was calibrated for DCV before the start of the measurements so they both started at the same point. I have been running a series of tests consisting of measuring the Cal Constant as detailed in Service Note 18 for each meter several times a day (to calculate the drift per the procedure in SN 18). I also measure the 732A voltage in each meter each time using NLPC 100 and NRDGS 100 and then recording the STDEV, MEAN, MAX, and MIN values. What I have observed is that the Cal Constant is acceptably low but the MEAN value per measurement is drifting up in one meter and drifting down in the other. The unit drifting down has a new A3 board installed and the unit drifting upward is an Agilent 3458A only a few years old so would not be expected to have a drifting A3 board. It was only calibrated 1 time per the internal REV number, so would have likely been re-calibrated if the A3 board was replaced. My question is what is the likely cause of the drift in the MEAN voltage reading if the Cal Constant value is relatively constant? SN 18 says the drift rate of the Cal Constant is an indication of drift in the A3 AD board, but I believe it assumes the A9 voltage ref board has a constant value over time. If this is not true (e;g., the voltage ref is drifting), I think this would explain the drift in the voltage reading even though the Cal Constant is relatively constant. Any opinions on this? Thanks, Randy Evans ___ volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts and follow the instructions there.
