[Vo]:Time Distortion Evidence on Flux Cap Delivery.

2010-05-15 Thread Harvey Norris
From Records;
Can Time itself be distorted in a way other then how Einstein predicted this by 
Relativity?
 I have discovered this process that converts time into voltage. It 
involves creating resonant voltage rises themselves separated in time within a 
cycle of the same frequency from a polyphase generator, where each phase has a 
voltage rise beyond their respective voltage inputs, and then measuring the 
relative voltages BETWEEN the resonated phases. To explain this to the layman 
initially requires the following question. I'm going on a long journey on 
planet earth where after traveling so far I turn at a right angle. I should 
have to do this 4 times to make a total square for each equal length of journey 
in one direction. After arriving of the 3rd corner, I am astounded to find that 
I have prematurely arrived back to the point where I started the journey. I 
have actually traveled from the equator to the pole, and back again using a 
right angle on the first and second turning points, so that a triangle appears 
to have the angles of a square. From this
 we can see that 2-D geometry laws may be distorted when applied to 3 D, and in 
this analogy the ordinary time laws of this dimension may be distorted by using 
opposing magnetic fields in resonance.
 Again the analogy of dimensional progression is applied here. A two 
dimensional flat equilateral triangle has three internal 60 degree angles, 
adding to 180. If we instead expand the internal area of this triangle by 
superimposing it on the 3-D curvature of a sphere, we find that now the 
individual angles become greater then the sum adding to 180, according to the 
ratio of the triangles internal area vs the total surface area of the sphere. 
If we just use a small portion of the sphere's surface area for the triangle 
the internal angle change is negligible, but if the triangle is expanded to 
encompass 1/8th of the total surface area of the sphere, its internal 60 degree 
angle will have increased 50% to 90 degrees. Now the analogy becomes expanding 
the three 120 degree phase angles in time 50 % greater to that of three 180 
phase angles in time. Somehow we presume that now a 4th dimensional coordinate 
has been added, with the result that time has been
 expanded, and a circle in time of phase angle differences no longer adds to 
360 degrees, but in excess to that. At this point in time a 440 degree phasing 
circle has been accomplished, with the result that a 1 volt input consuming a 
fifth of an amp is transformed upwards towards to 400 volts, but the amperage 
in that circuit is not reduced 400 volt but rather only 74 fold.
These things are (partly)made possible by the flux capacitor principle, 
whereby the electric and magnetic fields of a series resonance are made large 
enough so that the electric field can exist orthogonally inside the volume of 
the coils magnetic field, shown at Axially Insulated Water Capacity in 465 hz 
Resonance
http://www.flickr.com/photos/harvich/4138199465/
2009 Flux Capacitor Model
http://www.flickr.com/photos/harvich/4138926072/

Today I have added jpegs showing proof of time distortion; but first the 
schematic and then the 3 phase input amperages and voltages.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/harvich/4609480576/
3 phase interphasal schematic for spatially interacted resonances shown as 
green and red internal delivery lines. The voltages across these interphasings 
are referenced as previous DSR amperage and interphasal voltages jpeg 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/harvich/4609230044/
 3 phase Input amperages and voltages @ 1 volt levels for 2.6 ohm/ 25 mh outer 
delta series resonances@ 465 hz . TWO further high induction coils used to show 
the flux capacitor concept of spatially interacted resonances; where the 
electric field from one separately phased resonance exists orthogonally 
spatially inside the magnetic field of its adjacent phasing are attached as 
secondary loads between the first two interphasal voltages.
This is the crux of the biscuit here showing more interphasal output voltage 
then should exist if those voltages were divided 360 degrees in time, as three 
phase purports to create. As such here the complete phasing circle shows over 
440 degrees, unless this might possibly be disputed by the cos rule where 
because of unequal voltages on the inputs the 440 degrees is an over estimate. 

2.4 H/140 ohm interphasings
http://www.flickr.com/photos/harvich/4609536486/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/harvich/4608976709/

I will be reassembling the alternator circuits this spring.
Sincerely HDN
Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances 
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/


  



[Vo]:Time Distortion Evidence on Flux Cap Delivery.

2010-05-15 Thread Francis X Roarty

on Sat, 15 May 2010 11:54: Harvey Norris said

Can Time itself be distorted in a way other then how Einstein predicted this
by 

Relativity?

 

 

Harvey, we are asking the same question although we might still technically
have to call it relativity. The difference is that Einstein only referred

To the effects of changing velocity on the spatial axis where the ratio of
V^2/C^2  determines the rate of time dilation(gamma).  No one looked at

The possibility of altering the denominator because C is said to be a
constant. C is a constant in all inertial frames meaning that when you fire
a laser it moves away

From you  at 186kmiles/s regardless if you are stationary or already moving
at .9C. We can still say C is constant because we are reducing the spatial
ruler by which we measure time.

We see this as Lorentzian contraction from the perspective of another
inertial frame but locally we are unaware that space and time are even
reshaping to keep C constant because we are reshaping with it.

 

You and I and Ron Millet are trying to change the denominator in an abrupt
manner. The normal way using the numerator is through large velocity or the
equivalence method- a large mass to create a gravitational field both of
which slow time.  Both of these methods are a slow building Pythagorean
relationship between space and the 90 degree displaced time axis where our
vector/hypotenuse can only approach A theoretical limit of 45 degrees at
best on the time axis by producing an acceleration or g field approaching C.
if your temporal Y axis is defined as C and you attain a displacement
velocity of near C on your X axis you would think your  actual time/velocity
vector should be 1.44 C at 45 degrees but because the x axis is defined by
the rate of intersection with the Y axis this doesn't happen - the faster
you go On the X axis the less you intersect with a y axis moving
perpendicularly through the spatial plane.

 

Tapping energy based on differential energy between these inertial frames is
difficult due to the relative motion. In the case of equivalent acceleration
you could say a waterfall taps gravitational energy

But that is a one time effect that must be replenished by other energy
sources. The challenge is to find or create diverse inertial frames in close
proximity and stationary to each other. This would allow a more exploitable
environment than simple time dilation. A 1996 book titled Cavity QED
posits that a Casimir cavity produces this abrupt break between inertial
frames, shielding the interior from the ambient rate of time outside by
forcing virtual particles to fit between spatial boundaries too narrow for
their size/wavelength. This suggests the present Casimir theory that longer
wavelengths are displaced needs to be modified into the longer wavelengths
reshape space-time inside the cavity to make room for themselves. The
wavelengths will appear smaller in either case but in this interpretation
they better explain

The fractional hydrogen and clusters being reported by researchers.

 

I did follow your arguments regarding the math and electronic
implementations but can see with the complexities involved you are going to
need some irrefutable evidence -as will I for that matter:_)

Some of the questions that came to mind were resistive vs reactive
measurements which can burn you in any tank circuits and then there is that
8 mile coil you mentioned that could be picking up energy out of the air -
is it shielded? I am not being a total skeptic - Tesla said long ago that
the ether could be somewhat solidified by High voltage and I know from
personal experience to keep my high power capacitors shorted in storage or
they will pick up a charge.

Regards

Fran

 

 

 

 

 



[Vo]:I recovered

2010-05-15 Thread FZNIDARSIC
I'm back not worrying about things that I can't control. 
I am working  on my second video release, with the Alien Scientist. 
This release is  scheduled to appear with my July paper in IE. 
The Duality of Matter and  Waves. 
I intend to blow the mind of physics community.
 

Frank