RE: [Vo]:March 2011 Journal of Cosmology- Cyanobacteria = Alien Life
Also worth noting - some cyanobacteria have a natural high uptake for heavy metals http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-4660%28199801%2971 :1%3C15::AID-JCTB773%3E3.0.CO;2-8/abstract An implication of that curious fact is that they do this for survival, yet since the radioactivity of thorium or uranium would be detrimental to survival in most hospitable places like earth - it could be that some of them developed this trait for survival in space, and retained the trait once deposited here . fossilized oxygen-producing cyanobacteria have been found in ~3+ billion yr. old rock and they could have arrived in meteorites. No wonder the little green men have the identical coloration of cyanobacteria, it is probably a food source g From: Peter Gluck Thank you, very interesting- I have included it in my weekly INFORMAVOREs SUNDAY No 445- at my blog Peter On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Ron Kita chiralex.k...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings Vortex-L From the March 2011 Journal of Cosmology Cyanobacteria in Metrorites as Alien Life: http://journalofcosmology.com/Life100.html Ron Kita Chiralex -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:MODES OF THINKING at EGO OUT
My dear friends, Next week I will publish my Real Life Problem Solving System at my blog. This system is based on my *MODES OF THINKING*- a paper that I published today on my blog. It's first variant was published in Contemporanul - Ideea europeana in July 1990. Please read it, it is well verified in practice and up-to-dated. . I really don't want to become popular with my blog EGO OUT but I take my work seriously; there are so many wicked problems on our Planet. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/03/modes-of-thinking-my-taxonomy.html Thank you for your attention, excuse me for disturbing all my best wishes! Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:Cyno Groups- UFO Odors and Alien Life-Propulsion
Greetings Vortex-l, There is a highly interesting research paper by Rullan on UFO and Odors that relates to odors bieng a possible source of propulsive effects: http://www.scribd.com/doc/14029800/rullan I remember in the early 1950 s there was an incident of a downed UFO and its occupant being outside the craft and a very heavy level of ammonia. I am not sure if there is a chemistry for breathing ammonia, but Cyano groups are CN. Also, ammonia is very easy to liquify ...pressure circa 100 PSI. A liquid ammonia ocean could possible support life a needed oxidizer would be ??? or a halogen reaction.. ..this woulld change our concept of food. Ron Kita Chiralex
[Vo]:Greek broadcast of Rossi
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3TSjwfzUPQ Someone commented on wanting to see a scope shot. There is one at 1:35. The only guy speaking English on the vid is the Defkalion spokesperson. His confidence level seems to indicate that they could be further along than anyone realizes. If he was seeking investment, then hype would be expected - but since that is not the case, it makes everything seem a bit more convincing from the PoV of 'human nature'. Jones
Re: [Vo]:DeBono's Top Hat Thinking
I sam grateful for your sttention. My method is an slternstive to the Six Hats- I sm telling the story at the blog. An other discovery of De Bono I have used are the septoes- a literary genre. You will find some interesting things at the Blog. I own it in common with a lady (Georgina) who is working at a great bank in Vienna and was my best e-collaborator at my former newsletter.(2002-2010) She writes very well and I hope she will be a writer. Peter On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Wm. Scott Smith scott...@hotmail.comwrote: I will be checking out your site with great interest. Modes of Thinking remind me of DeBono's Books on Top Hat Thinking which has to do with Changing your Thinking Cap My dear friends, Next week I will publish my Real Life Problem Solving System at my blog. This system is based on my *MODES OF THINKING*- a paper that I published today on my blog. It's first variant was published in Contemporanul - Ideea europeana in July 1990. Please read it, it is well verified in practice and up-to-dated. . I really don't want to become popular with my blog EGO OUT but I take my work seriously; there are so many wicked problems on our Planet. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/03/modes-of-thinking-my-taxonomy.html Thank you for your attention, excuse me for disturbing all my best wishes! Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
FW: Re: [Vo]:\Tunneling\
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 23:13: Harry Veeder wrote Harry, [snip] I am not familiar with this concept of equivalent acceleration.[/snip] Same as gravity we experience 9.8 m/s^2 as an averaging effect that changes the gradient at our scale but,IMHO, at the subatomic level or amplified by suppression this level can be concentrated to the point where it affects the half lives of radioactive gases. This is still relativistic hydrogen but through equivalent acceleration. The twin paradox can be accomplished by spatial acceleration or by equivalent acceleration where one twin sits at the bottom of a very deep gravity well and accumulates time dilation just as if he were actually traveling at the equivalent velocity. I don't think we have a true understanding for just how strong these nano forces can be concentrated by suppression. We see everything from a macro perspective where the isotropy represents a huge averaging down of these forces by all the empty space between matter. Suppression by itself only rescales things but when you store some of this energy in the kinetic motion of gas you realize the potential to carry away (coast) with some of this energy into other matter at different levels of suppression. Like the twin paradox these atoms have no idea they are contracted, from their perspective they are simply being pushed through normal space but from our perspective they appear time dilated while remaining relatively stationary spatially. You can see my interest in how this could relate to tunneling and the reduced columbic barrier as these relativistic interactions would affect the time metrics. [snip] Is the lattice responsible for this suppression?[/snip] Yes -not as concentrated as a Casimir cavity but still suppressed - My opinion regarding why DiFiore et all were unable to accumulate the sudden break in isotropy by stacking Casimir cavities and why we have claims of both accelerated and retarded half lives of radioactive gas is because suppression actually represents a segregation of isotropy where the sudden concentrated break noted for cavities is balanced by a larger slower gradient of enhancement outside the cavity wall that acts as a reservoir feeding the cavity. On a very local scale I think the lattice nuclei performs a similar segregation Of isotropy where the interstitial space between lattice nuclei forms pockets where protons and possibly condensed forms of hydrogen molecules can load/reside due to suppression. In my extended Puthoff atomic model the nuclei presents more opposition to the vacuum flux than Orbitals forming a relativistic micro well where electrons chase behind the nuclei Like tethered balls - never able to catch up but rather forming a balance with the opposing vacuum flux streaming through our physical plane. In a metal lattice the tops of these wells arrange themselves into geometric zones with anomalously large spatial volume where the gas proton with appropriate orientation can stably load into the lattice. I believe condensed h2 can also be loaded into the lattice but think higher suppression of h1 by defects or cavities is first required for the suppressed h2 to form and then it must remain suppressed inside the lattice until it finds a vacancy. I think the reason no one ever sees a stationary hydrino or relativistic hydrogen is because the covalent bond isn't strong enough to keep the micro wells tied together without suppression - catalytic disassociation can occur going from h2 into suppression OR from suppressed/fractional h2 to a different suppression level. So when the suppressed h2 exits the lattice it disassociates- possibly many times as nature may reform different fractional h2 values until the suppression is finally dissipated. I would point to the odd spectrum of Black Light plasma as being due to this relativistic interpretation of suppression. Regards Fran on Wednesday, March 02, 2011 11:27 Harry Veeder wrote [snip]The concept of quantum mechanical tunneling suggests that a particle can, with a certain probability, bore its way through a columb barrier. Suppose, instead, the probability is indicative of a fluctuating columb field in which portals momentarily open and close. A particle that happens to be moving quickly enough and is headed in the right direction would be able to coast through an opening before it closes.[/snip] Harry, Your description also supports Naudt's proposal of relativistic hydrogen - this isn't hydrogen at near C spatial velocity but equivalent acceleration I am not familiar with this concept of equivalent acceleration. caused by DIRECT manipulation of vacuum energy density using suppression. Is the lattice responsible for this suppression? Your statement [snip] A particle that happens to be moving quickly enough and is headed in the right direction would be able to coast through an opening before it closes.[/snip] has a temporal interpretation. The
FW: [Vo]:Word of the Day: Mesoscopic
On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 17:08 Jones Beene wrote [snip] Why do we need a competing term with nano? Because the mesoscopic object has BOTH classical and quantum features as well as a mix of both, all at the same time in the same particle. It is simply a wider range, and implies a composite. It also implies complexity.[/snip] Jones, A similar point I have been trying to emphasize is the very local vs quantum accumulated forces over a larger geometric area. Suppression is by nature a tradeoff that falls off at an inverse exponential rate between parallel plate surfaces while the local motion of gas atoms is still governed by the immediate forces. These are the same forces at different scales, The Puthoff model of chaotic vacuum flux restoring balance to the ground state results in the random motion of gas at the very local scale but rapidly organizes into a gravitational segregation for the appropriate geometry on a larger scale. I guess we can throw chemical bonding into the very local scale also since it is the same force again seeking to push matter into the least opposing configuration for the passage of flux through our spatial plane. From a neo Lorentz perspective -4D- the nuclei presents much more opposition than orbital to this flow and the electrons trail behind like tethered balls on the time axis. During suppression this micro relativistic well appears to stretch from our perspective which is why I believe gas atoms can translate freely but bonded electrons oppose the translation since they are being pulled down 2 different wells but are tied together at the top. Regards Fran
[Vo]:Video of Kullander and Essen interview on YouTube
Physicists Sven Kullander and Hanno Essén interviewed about the Rossi-Focardi cell, with English subtitles: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vt2JqEmaUGc - Jed
[Vo]:Egypt in Crisis! Is Cold Fusion a Fraud? Consumer Spending Rises!
Egypt in Crisis! Is Cold Fusion a Fraud? Consumer Spending Rises! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jtPhAAsA4U cold fusion discussion begins at 2:23 Harry
[Vo]:Swedish professors discuss Rossi's E-CAT
Physicists Sven Kullander and Hanno Essén interviewed about the Rossi-Focardi cell, with English subtitles: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vt2JqEmaUGc source video and article found here: http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article324.ece Dr. Edmund Storms on Andrea Rossi's Cold Fusion Technology: We've Arrived. http://www.freeenergytimes.com/2011/03/05/dr-edmund-storms-on-andrea-rossis-cold-fusion-technology-weve-arrived/ Harry
Re: [Vo]:Video of Kullander and Essen interview on YouTube
From: Jed Rothwell Sent: Sunday, March 6, 2011 2:26:51 PM Subject: [Vo]:Video of Kullander and Essen interview on YouTube Physicists Sven Kullander and Hanno Essén interviewed about the Rossi-Focardi cell, with English subtitles: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vt2JqEmaUGc How do they translate the phrase The theories are very outhouse. ?
RE: [Vo]:Egypt in Crisis! Is Cold Fusion a Fraud? Consumer Spending Rises!
From Harry: Egypt in Crisis! Is Cold Fusion a Fraud? Consumer Spending Rises! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jtPhAAsA4U cold fusion discussion begins at 2:23 He's a decent speaker. Knows how to talk. However, I thought his spiel pertaining to the Rossi Focardi's event struck me as highly disjointed and full of mangled facts. Considered where he apparently got his information from (Fox News) it is not surprising that the conclusion he has presently arrived at is mangled. Despite this handicap the speaker makes astute points pertaining to FOX News which in turned is owned by Murdoch - and Murdoch's own oil investments. It's obvious that this speaker is perfectly capable of connecting the dots if he were to gain access to more accurate information. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
[Vo]:Zirconium-96
If zirconium (as zirconia) should turn-up as Rossi's secret catalyst - which to be honest is doubtful except for knowing how the Arata/Kitamura/Takahashi etc result may depend on Zr . but if it does turn up in the E-Cat, the following could be relevant in leading to a working theory based on expanding Haisch/Moddel and Casimir heating. Naturally occurring zirconium is composed of four stable isotopes and one very long-lived radioisotope of atomic weight 96 (96Zr), which is almost 3% of natural. Most unusual to appear is such a percentage and having the long half-life but at the same time being radioactive (ultimately) and in a metal that is not an exotic. Moreover, this exact combination of properties makes this isotope of zirconium a prime candidate for a new version of ZPE merged with QM/QED theory. The concept incorporates accelerated nuclear decay as the route that nature has chosen to balance the books of local energy depletion. That requires a radioisotope and accelerated decay. Presumably, the longer the half life, the more likely it will decay cleanly. Thorium is also in this category. In fact, if you specify that there must be at least 2% of the candidate isotope in the natural ore, these two plus U are the only good candidates that I can find in nature (based on high tonnage resources). The key distinction between this version of ZPE theory and others is that it is also inherently a nuclear process, and dependent on the weak force in a nearly net neutral way, but decayed until energy is already depleted locally, which alters the probability field. In operation of a reactor, excess energy can arrive immediately in the form of heat from the zero point field (via Casimir/Lamb-shift manipulation); but that kind of excess-energy is immediately self-limiting if there is not a radioactive isotope nearby - in the local area, which can decay at an accelerated rate in order to supply the energy deficit from the ZPE interactions. This is QM time reversal. ZPE is the proximate cause of gain, nuclear decay is the ultimate cause of gain. The features of this version of ZPE may mesh with actual experiment in a way that no other theory can accommodate - to wit: 1) High energy density approaching 100,000 times more than chemical by mole 2) Low, but non-zero radiation during operation 3) Low, but non-zero radiation in the ash on shut down 4) Molybdenum is the main transmutation product and is as valuable as Zr FALSIFIABILITY - This is most important: 96Zr can be obtained as an enriched alloy since it is separated from the common alloy used as cladding in fission reactors. It should show significantly better gain than natural zirconia when used as the support dielectric in gas phase LENR. 96Zr as best I can tell, would supply a net energy of ~4 MeV going to Mo; and if 2% of natural zirconium was the average of what could be easily burned using natural ore, to provide the makeup ZPE energy, then that averages to roughly 80 keV per atom it would seem. This is all tentative and the most redeeming feature is the (arguable) fit to the Rossi experiment (assuming the Cu seen is from electromigration). Jones
Re: [Vo]:Zirconium-96
Zirconium-96 From: Jones Beene Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2011 8:46 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Zirconium-96 If zirconium (as zirconia) should turn-up as Rossi's secret catalyst - which to be honest is doubtful except for knowing how the Arata/Kitamura/Takahashi etc result may depend on Zr . but if it does turn up in the E-Cat, the following could be relevant in leading to a working theory based on expanding Haisch/Moddel and Casimir heating. ... The nice thing for me is that it is a proton conductor.
[Vo]:The Limitations of Logic
The main thing I got out of DeBono was the limitations of logic. As a matter of routine, we generally start solving a problem with logic, (assuming that we are not jumping to premature conclusions.) and we should do so. Logic, when used, usually carries the day; however, with seemingly intractable problems, logic locks you into endlessly repeating iterations of already-known approaches. I have found great value in the technique of casting about for any and all conceivable approaches-no matter how ridiculous with no initial judgement or evaluation. It breaks one out of the rut of endlessly trying mere iterations of the same old approaches. We sometimes talk about thinking outside the box but we don't stop to consider the details of what that must really mean. To me, I have to think inside the box most of the time, that is I must make routine decisions routinely; however, when I have exhausted every method inside my box, then there is no good alternative than to look outside of the box. Here is the real problem: On the one hand, everything we have already decided is relevant, is already inside the box but we have already, rightly ruled those approaches out. On the other hand, we have already decided that everything outside the box is irrelevant (or else we would have already put it into the box where we keep relevant approaches.) When one is really stuck on a problem, it really helps to make a conscious decision to whimsically start considering all the absurd or humorous or ridiculous impossibilities. Its the only thing that is going to deliver you from endless, and fruitless permutations of known approaches. Once you successfully leap to a new possibility--even an absurd one, your mind is finally in new territory and is getting new perspective that might lead to a better approach. I am looking forward to exploring your Alternative Modes of Thought. What do you specifically object to in Top Hat thinking? Thank you for your time! You might enjoy my essays on Populistocracy---Democratic Election by lottery!z-pec.yolasite.com Scott Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 21:27:34 +0200 Subject: Re: [Vo]:DeBono's Top Hat Thinking From: peter.gl...@gmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com I sam grateful for your sttention. My method is an slternstive to the Six Hats- I sm telling the story at the blog.An other discovery of De Bono I have used are the septoes- a literarygenre. You will find some interesting things at the Blog. I own it in common with a lady (Georgina) who is working at a great bank in Vienna and was my best e-collaborator at my former newsletter.(2002-2010) She writes very well and I hope she will be a writer.Peter On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Wm. Scott Smith scott...@hotmail.com wrote: I will be checking out your site with great interest. Modes of Thinking remind me of DeBono's Books on Top Hat Thinking which has to do with Changing your Thinking Cap My dear friends, Next week I will publish my Real Life ProblemSolving System at my blog. This system isbased on my MODES OF THINKING- a paper that I published today on my blog. It's first variant was published in Contemporanul - Ideea europeana in July 1990.Please read it, it is well verified in practice and up-to-dated..I really don't want to become popular with my blog EGO OUT but I take my work seriously; there are so manywicked problems on our Planet. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/03/modes-of-thinking-my-taxonomy.html Thank you for your attention, excuse me for disturbingall my best wishes! Peter -- Dr. Peter GluckCluj, Romaniahttp://egooutpeters.blogspot.com -- Dr. Peter GluckCluj, Romaniahttp://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:Lund University prof evaluates Rossi's E-Cat
a google translation http://tinyurl.com/478s7ka of this source http://www.fysik.org/website/fragelada/index.asp?id=17662 Question: Hello! I wonder what you think about the most recent report on cold fusion? What is new compared to what came up in 1989? /Arne S / Arne S Answer: There are both similarities and differences. The similarity is that it presents the news at a press conference, bypassing the normal process of publishing a full report in a peer reviewed journal. The main difference is that it suggests a very different kind of fusion than hydrogen fusion: the fusion reaction between hydrogen and nickel. More on this below... [a TV news video is included. ] Harry
