Re: [Vo]:Co59 Beta decay rates on Magnetar surface

[Stephen Cooke]

Ahh I forgot to ask.., was the earlier posting about the paper you mentioned on 
magnetars here in Vortex-l or on the LENR forum by the way?


> On 07 Sep 2016, at 18:10, Bob Cook  wrote:
> 
> Revision/addition of recent message to Stephen--
>  
> Stephen—
>  
> I agree that the data from the magnetars are important.  It may be important 
> in getting to a unified theory linking gravity and EM fields.   The absence 
> of spectra may even identify dark matter—hydrinos for example.   Mills’s 
> theory may see the light of day from magnetars.
>  
> The data, combined with the note from the recent Pam Mosier-Boss etal  paper 
> summarizing the Pd-D work over the years for everybody—including for DOD 
> presentation for Congress in a couple weeks—regarding super conductivity, is 
> intriguing to say the least.  Alain’s (of Paris) early note about this paper 
> being important is right on..
>  
> The large magnetic fields should make it possible to discern spin energy 
> states associated with various nuclear species.  Their 
> separation—differential energies—in a strong gravitational field may show how 
> angular momentum associated with spin are linked to mass energy and hence 
> gravity.  It may be that Plank’s quanta of angular momentum (h/2pi) is 
> noticeably greater at the surface of a magnetar.   The study of such stars 
> with different magnetic/gravitational fields will become the focus of 
> cosmology soon, if not already the focus as you suggest—a hot topic. 
>  
> I continue to speculate that the coupling of spin energy to orbital spin 
> energy states of electrons in a metal lattice is key to understanding how the 
> LENR occurs without much normal 2-body high energy physics 
> radiation—neutrons, gammas etc.  
>  
> Bob Cook
>  
> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>  
> From: Bob Cook
> Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2016 7:26 AM
> To: Stephen Cooke; vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Co59 Beta decay rates on Magnetar surface
>  
> Stephen—
>  
> I agree that the data from the magnetars are important.  It may be important 
> in getting to a unified theory linking gravity and EM fields.   The absence 
> of spectra may even identify dark matter—hydrinos for example.  
>  
> Tis data combined with the note from the recent Pam Mosier-Boss paper 
> summarizing the Pd-D work over the years for everybody—including for DOD 
> presentation for Congress in a couple
>  
> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>  
> From: Stephen Cooke
> Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2016 1:34 AM
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Co59 Beta decay rates on Magnetar surface
>  
> Thank you very much for this link Bob. 
> 
> It looks like an interesting paper.
> 
> It looks like the phenomena on the surface of magnetars is a hot topic this 
> year.
> 
> I wonder if this can be an effective data source forand analogue for 
> conditions present in LENR? At the very least they should give some insight 
> about the magnetic nature of physical processes involved in particle decays 
> and interactions that may be applicable even in lower magnetic fields.
> 
> Perhaps the local magnetic field in a nucleus at fm distances has impacts on 
> nucleon stability and decay rates either directly or through resonance 
> phenomena, perhaps at quark level. 
> 
> If so it would be interesting to know if there can still be significant 
> influence say at a few hundred fm if the magnetic moment and available energy 
> states are high.
> 
> I wonder if their are any other interesting observational indicators on 
> Magnetars it would be interesting maybe to see if the spectra can reveal the 
> isotope ratios of elements. I suppose this might be easily possible for 
> lighter elements and maybe due to the magnetic field from fine structure 
> characteristics of the spectra. UV and X-Ray spectra could also be 
> interesting especially if they can reveal something about the excitation 
> state of the electrons in the atoms and the nucleus excitation states, as 
> well as more macroscopic X-ray and RF radiation effects due to the plasma 
> effects. Even though it's very different place and overall conditions than a 
> LENR device, perhaps there are a lot of LENR physics analogues at macro scale 
> that are applicable to LENR on micro scale that can be observed there.
> 
> 
> 
> On 07 Sep 2016, at 06:33, Bob Cook  wrote:
> 
>> Another free document regarding much of the same theory and data regarding 
>> reactions in high magnetic fields can be found here:
>>  
>> http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1603.01898
>>  
>> Note the importance of spin energy and the energy released by neutrinos; 
>> also the significant data regarding reaction parameters for mid-mass nuclei.
>>  
>> This adds to the idea of the large magnetic fields created locally by SPP’s 
>> on metal surfaces or lattice cavities.
>>  
>> Bob Cook
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>>  
>> From: Stephen Cooke
>> Sent: Tuesday, 

[Vo]:LENR CULTURS, an interview with Andrea Rossi

[Peter Gluck]

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/09/aug-8-2016-lenr-cultures-interview-with.html

best,
Peter
-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com