Re: [Vo]:An argument against intellectual property rights

[H LV]

I searched for the Economist article from 1851 after I heard the labour
economist Guy Standing mention it in this recent discussion at DAVOS at
22:20

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5n4j8-zUE4

Guy Standing points out that intellectual property is part of rentier
Capitalism. He cites the Economist article because it argues that such
rights are not really rights but are in fact privileged forms of income or
rent determined by legislation rather than by free markets. However,
instead of doing away with such privileged forms of income as the Economist
argues, I think Guy's point is that the government ought to be
redistributing some of this rental income back to the wider society in the
form of a basic income.

Harry



On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 9:08 PM, H LV  wrote:

> Article in the Economist arguing against intellectual property rights.
>
> http://www.economist.com/news/business-and-finance/21660753-
> our-leader-patents-1851-right-property-inventions
>
> Feb 1st, 1851
>
> The right of property in inventions
>
> WE ARE challenged by some observations in the Morning Chronicle of
> Wednesday to resume the consideration of the claims of inventors. We have
> as strong a desire as our contemporary, or as the Committee of the Society
> of Arts, whose views he expounds, that genius should meet its appropriate
> rewards—that invention should be encouraged—that discoverers of useful
> things should be honoured—that no thought permanently beneficially should
> be lost; but we cannot, therefore, conclude that inventors should have a
> monopoly for a limited period of certain published thoughts and plans,
> which they may have been the first to conceive.
>
> continues here
> http://www.economist.com/news/business-and-finance/21660753-
> our-leader-patents-1851-right-property-inventions
>

RE: [Vo]:LENR OUTLAST

[Russ George]

Timely news in science if ever there were. 
http://atom-ecology.russgeorge.net/2017/01/29/matter-made-with-an-extra-dimension-time-crystals/
 

 

From: Peter Gluck [mailto:peter.gl...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2017 12:31 PM
To: Arik El Boher; Bo Hoistadt; Brian Ahern; Dagmar Kuhn; David Daggett; doug 
marker; Dr. Braun Tibor; eCatNews; Gabriel Moagar-Poladian; Gary; Haiko Lietz; 
jeff aries; Mark Tsirlin; Nicolaie N. Vlad; Peter Bjorkbom; Peter Mobberley; 
Pierre Clauzon; Roberto Germano; Roy Virgilio; Steve Katinski; Sunwon Park; 
Valerio Ciampoli; vlad; VORTEX
Subject: [Vo]:LENR OUTLAST

 




http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/01/jan-29-2017-in-lenr-you-must-out-f-f.html

 

 

peter

-- 

Dr. Peter Gluck

Cluj, Romania

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

[Vo]:An argument against intellectual property rights

[H LV]

Article in the Economist arguing against intellectual property rights.

http://www.economist.com/news/business-and-finance/21660753-our-leader-patents-1851-right-property-inventions

Feb 1st, 1851

The right of property in inventions

WE ARE challenged by some observations in the Morning Chronicle of
Wednesday to resume the consideration of the claims of inventors. We have
as strong a desire as our contemporary, or as the Committee of the Society
of Arts, whose views he expounds, that genius should meet its appropriate
rewards—that invention should be encouraged—that discoverers of useful
things should be honoured—that no thought permanently beneficially should
be lost; but we cannot, therefore, conclude that inventors should have a
monopoly for a limited period of certain published thoughts and plans,
which they may have been the first to conceive.

continues here
http://www.economist.com/news/business-and-finance/21660753-our-leader-patents-1851-right-property-inventions

RE: [Vo]:Time crystals, aka quantum matter

[Russ George]

>From the paper, "The discovery might sound pretty abstract, but it heralds
in a whole new era in physics - for decades we've been studying matter
that's defined as being 'in equilibrium', such as metals and insulators.

But it's been predicted that there are many more strange types of matter out
there in the Universe that aren't in equilibrium that we haven't even begun
to look into, including time crystals. And now we know they're real." 

Seems like a useful point of view.

 

 

From: Russ George [mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2017 4:24 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Time crystals, aka quantum matter

 

It seems that the creation and detailed observation of 'time crystals' is
another shoe falling on the head of physics dogma. That such crystals can be
created is evidence that states of matter that are deeply connection in
here-to-fore quantum domains where they share energy is some of what the
doctor ordered, Dr. Schwinger that is, to diagnose the 'cold fusion' of
Fleischmann and Pons. Clearly there is more to the Cheshire cat than his
grin.
http://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-have-just-announced-a-brand-new-form-
of-matter-time-crystals?perpetual=yes
 =1 

[Vo]:Time crystals, aka quantum matter

[Russ George]

It seems that the creation and detailed observation of 'time crystals' is
another shoe falling on the head of physics dogma. That such crystals can be
created is evidence that states of matter that are deeply connection in
here-to-fore quantum domains where they share energy is some of what the
doctor ordered, Dr. Schwinger that is, to diagnose the 'cold fusion' of
Fleischmann and Pons. Clearly there is more to the Cheshire cat than his
grin.
http://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-have-just-announced-a-brand-new-form-
of-matter-time-crystals?perpetual=yes
 =1 

[Vo]:LENR OUTLAST

[Peter Gluck]

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/01/jan-29-2017-in-lenr-you-must-out-f-f.html


peter
-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com