Re: [Vo]:Give It Up for Randell
How independent can this test be when he works for Black Light Power. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/author/37333130700
Re: [Vo]:[OT] Vipervirus Truth?
wrote: > Also the numbers are too low because of people that are infected and die > away from medical care and thus don't get > included in the statistics. > The number of people who die is too low for this reason. But, the number of people who get sick and get no medical care is far higher than the number of people who die without medical care. In other words, the number of people who recover unaccounted for (without medical care) is far higher than the number of deaths. In most cases, people with severe cases seek medical care, and they are counted when they die. For this reason, the mortality rate skews higher than it really is. There were also some patients who died in the hospital from Wuhan flu but the death was ascribed to some other cause. I think this happened more often in the early weeks. It is happening less often now. I think I read that in news reports.
Re: [Vo]:[OT] Vipervirus Truth?
In reply to Jonathan Berry's message of Mon, 10 Feb 2020 07:44:04 +1300: Hi, Note that when deriving the mortality rate, one needs to take into account the time it takes an average victim to die. E.g. if that is 2 weeks, then the deaths now need to be compared with the number of people that were infected 2 weeks ago, not with the number infected now. Also the numbers are too low because of people that are infected and die away from medical care and thus don't get included in the statistics. >If it's just a slightly worse flu, these would be bizarre >over-reactions from a Government that was initially very laidback. > >At any rate I wrote this last night and am sending the almost still up >to date figures now: >Infected: >37,553 nowish >30,000 2 days ago >20,000 5 days ago > >Despite the efforts it's still growing, though the rate of growth is >slowing down. >https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ See the chart, the growth >is steep despite massive efforts by China >https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-cases/ encouraging and frightening, the daily cases and growth factor show >potential hope that it will be under control, but >813 (this morning 815) deaths > >Looking though at the deaths .vs recovered, well everyone who hasn't >yet died or recovered could still do either one, so 2,990 recovered >and 815 dead, that's 21.4% fatality rate. > >Not sayig that reflect reality, but it does come closer to some of the >other bits of evidence that support the idea that the lethality of >this is an order of magnitude worse than what is publicly disclosed. > >On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 3:55 AM Terry Blanton wrote: >> >> Some good news: >> >> https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/feb/08/misinformation-coronavirus-contagious-infections >> >> and some not so good: >> >> https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7980883/Video-shows-officials-protective-suits-dragging-suspected-coronavirus-carriers-homes.html >> >>> Regards, Robin van Spaandonk local asymmetry = temporary success
Re: [Vo]:Re: Give It Up for Randell
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sun, 9 Feb 2020 11:59:17 -0500: Hi, The COP however still leaves a little to be desired. I don't think they can use this for electricity generation just yet. As an efficient heat source, yes. >On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 11:54 AM Terry Blanton wrote: >> >> ...one more time! >> >> >https://revolution-green.com/blp-4-24x-gain-yielding-295-71-kw-net-excess-power-validated-unc-phd-randy-booker/ > > >The poorly focused images remind me of UFO piccys! Regards, Robin van Spaandonk local asymmetry = temporary success
Re: [Vo]:[OT] Vipervirus Truth?
If it's just a slightly worse flu, these would be bizarre over-reactions from a Government that was initially very laidback. At any rate I wrote this last night and am sending the almost still up to date figures now: Infected: 37,553 nowish 30,000 2 days ago 20,000 5 days ago Despite the efforts it's still growing, though the rate of growth is slowing down. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ See the chart, the growth is steep despite massive efforts by China https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-cases/ wrote: > > Some good news: > > https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/feb/08/misinformation-coronavirus-contagious-infections > > and some not so good: > > https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7980883/Video-shows-officials-protective-suits-dragging-suspected-coronavirus-carriers-homes.html > >>
Re: [Vo]:Give It Up for Randell
Has Mills finally done it? Time (and peer reviewed publication), will tell. Nick Palmer On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 16:54, Terry Blanton wrote: > ...one more time! > > > https://revolution-green.com/blp-4-24x-gain-yielding-295-71-kw-net-excess-power-validated-unc-phd-randy-booker/ > >
[Vo]:Re: Give It Up for Randell
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 11:54 AM Terry Blanton wrote: > > ...one more time! > > https://revolution-green.com/blp-4-24x-gain-yielding-295-71-kw-net-excess-power-validated-unc-phd-randy-booker/ The poorly focused images remind me of UFO piccys!
[Vo]:Give It Up for Randell
...one more time! https://revolution-green.com/blp-4-24x-gain-yielding-295-71-kw-net-excess-power-validated-unc-phd-randy-booker/
