Re: [Vo]:Current Findings on the Undeniable Alien Presence

2022-08-27 Thread Terry Blanton
Intervention is nigh:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mission_Earth_(novel_series)

On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 7:53 PM Robin 
wrote:

> In reply to  Vibrator !'s message of Sat, 27 Aug 2022 20:49:36 +0100:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> >
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RXOssOGtruFqA1h8TA_eWqMaPgF4unUQ/view?usp=sharing
>
> It would be nice if the URL's listed here were actually clickable. :)
> Next to each entry you have a 1 line summary. You could make the summary
> the visible portion of the URL, and the actual
> URL itself would be the link.
> In short make
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RXOssOGtruFqA1h8TA_eWqMaPgF4unUQ/view
> document an actual html document.
> [snip]
> Regards,
>
> R. van Spaandonk
>
> Crops, not towns, should be planted on floodplains.
> Even the ancient Egyptians knew this.
>
>


Re: [Vo]:Max Planck quote

2022-08-27 Thread Terry Blanton
Reality is a derivative of consciousness.

On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 6:48 PM H LV  wrote:

> “I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from
> consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk
> about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness.” --
> Max Planck
>
> Source: The Observer (25 January 1931)
>


Re: [Vo]:Did the Big Bang happen? - Sabine Hossenfelder

2022-08-27 Thread Terry Blanton
It's turtles all the way down.

On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 1:39 PM H LV  wrote:

> A big bang, a big bounce, a black hole, a network, a collision of
> membranes, a gas of strings...
>
> She argues that all these attempts to explain the origin of the universe
> are creation myths expressed in the language of mathematics. That doesn't
> make them wrong, but it does make them _ascientific_. The virtue of the big
> bang theory is that it is the simplest explanation we know, but it is also
> probably wrong.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAVUvq6BE1E
>
> harry
>


Re: [Vo]:Current Findings on the Undeniable Alien Presence

2022-08-27 Thread Robin
In reply to  Vibrator !'s message of Sat, 27 Aug 2022 20:49:36 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RXOssOGtruFqA1h8TA_eWqMaPgF4unUQ/view?usp=sharing

It would be nice if the URL's listed here were actually clickable. :)
Next to each entry you have a 1 line summary. You could make the summary the 
visible portion of the URL, and the actual
URL itself would be the link.
In short make 
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RXOssOGtruFqA1h8TA_eWqMaPgF4unUQ/view document 
an actual html document.
[snip]
Regards,

R. van Spaandonk

Crops, not towns, should be planted on floodplains.
Even the ancient Egyptians knew this.



[Vo]:Max Planck quote

2022-08-27 Thread H LV
“I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from
consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk
about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness.” --
Max Planck

Source: The Observer (25 January 1931)


[Vo]:Current Findings on the Undeniable Alien Presence

2022-08-27 Thread Vibrator !
Lots of amazing discoveries to plough through so i'll try keep it brief,
however a certain minimum of word-space is required just to summarise
current findings:

 • there are multiple different alien beings visiting constantly

 • there are multiple different humanoids using saucer craft

ie. implying independent co-discovery of convergent solutions, or else some
degree of cross-pollination

 • these include bug-eyed bipeds of various sizes, but predominantly smaller

 • there may be at least one distinctly human-like form, air-breathing,
caucasian-like..

 • our relationship to these particular folk remains opaque; we may be in
contact, albeit in very much a subservient role

 • the overwhelming majority of sightings may be related to one of the
above races; which, remains unclear

 • the alien in question i can only thus far identify as 'the box-orb
people' - their saucers deploy and collect box-orbs

 • their saucers each appear able to accommodate perhaps a dozen
'normal'-sized box-orb craft:  accordingly, box-orb sightings may be 10x
more common than saucers

 • both box-orbs and saucers make extensive use of metamaterial
constructions, sharing many advanced features and abilities

 • this metamaterial technology is very highly scalable - craft as large as
anything in sci-fi are regularly imaged by various systems...

 • ...conversely, units as small as insects are also occasionally captured
on film..!

 • these miniature alien craft present a particularly compelling study
specimen, as encounters invariably occur at point-blank ranges

For instance, with multiple independent 1080p / 60 Hz captures we can
observe refraction anomalies / warping of background imagery,
photo-electric interactions with ambient or applied lighting, material
interactions with their surrounding environment, kinematic characteristics
(how they move), and perhaps deduce something more of their behaviour,
purpose and intentions.

One particular hypothesis that appears bolstered by these most remarkable
captures is a potential solution to the so-called 'five observables':

  • we're seeing a propulsion mode that eschews classical translation -
and, thus, acceleration, inertia, momentum, KE and dissipation - for a
process of controlled, continual high-frequency quantum tunnelling;  the
frequency constantly variable, but generally above ~60 Hz

That is, 60 FPS video of these craft at a range of a few centimetres from
the camera clearly shows accelerating motion as a series of 'quantum leaps'
rising in frequency into an effectively-continuous motion.. thus implying
higher frame-rates will push back that illusion of translation a little
further..

In principle each jump might be as small as a Planck length, with a very
high cycle frequency..  conversely however this would also account for the
larger-scale flitting about observed when these saucers engage their
hyperdrives - an effect i'd somewhat-awkwardly dubbed 'transient positional
indeterminacies', assuming it a consequence of en masse position / momentum
covariance - but it would also obviate the questions re. sourcing and
sinking of KE and momentum, absence of dissipation effects etc.   For
reasons i'll expand on below, high-speed IR footage would seem the ideal
way to test this conjecture, however this kind of kit ain't cheap..

 • saucers - the ones responsible for the box-orbs, at any rate - appear to
switch between at least two distinct forms of propulsion, characterised as
'red glow' mode, and 'white glow' mode; the former associated with general
flight, landing, deployment and collection of box-orbs, the latter with
non-Newtonian characteristics and macro-scale quantum effects

 • white-glow mode involves hypersonic acceleration, and spontaneously
hyperspacing in a brilliant flash of rapidly-shrinking white light,
sometimes square-shaped

 • additionally, often square-shaped flashes of white light are seen to pop
off around the craft in this mode

 • a white-glowing square shape may envelope the saucer, only the rim /
flange protruding at the sides

 • the actual position of the craft may appear to jump around erratically
within a finite radius, reminiscent of a quantum object

 • the red glow is predominantly reported as more pronounced from the
craft's lower portions or underside, often together with a red light on top

 • the red glow can vary in intensity, from a dull brown to bright orange,
perhaps indicative of thermal load..

At this point it may be worth noting a point Rossi's paper invokes: cold
plasmas induced via high dv/dt electrostatic impulses spontaneously form
low-entropy states consolidating Fermi numbers, and so restricting thermal
degrees of freedom for expressing / embodying heat energy;  cooling / heat
exchange might thus pose a critical engineering problem in mass-scale
quasi-bosonic aggregates, and inadvertent over-heating may be a common
failure mode in saucer crashes.  One such incident caught on video seems
highly consistent with such a 

[Vo]:Did the Big Bang happen? - Sabine Hossenfelder

2022-08-27 Thread H LV
A big bang, a big bounce, a black hole, a network, a collision of
membranes, a gas of strings...

She argues that all these attempts to explain the origin of the universe
are creation myths expressed in the language of mathematics. That doesn't
make them wrong, but it does make them _ascientific_. The virtue of the big
bang theory is that it is the simplest explanation we know, but it is also
probably wrong.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAVUvq6BE1E

harry