[Vo]:cult leader
Hello Frank, A knowledge-change specialist out of Denver worked with me for a spell toward realizing how to organize 'cult followers'. She's the professional-for-hire that chairs corporate action committees that have issues to work through that a group facilitation can organize to conquer. We couldn't help myself, as she said People are like heard animals. We look for leaders --so start a following-heard and get back to me. That was a show stopper for me, being a bobcat at heart, and not much of a leader (but a top cat in the woods). What groupies do in volunteer action committees is the work. I'd like to offer an illustration or two, if it is within my reach to make using POVRay, that would help convey the nucleosonic concepts you've realized. With help, we could do more. Informally, us groupies, a.k.a., the Znidarsic Fan Club, or the lay support, or new-age amateur physicists, could discover each other through your supporting introduction (a private affair), and perhaps we could find a way to promote your 'daring insight.' Mind noise... Do you have an Einstein wig, Frank? That'd make a great poster with you in an Einstein wig with your equations pasted in, with overlays of a few illustrations in 3D perspective. If you would stick out your tongue for a picture in you wig (like in one of Einstein's famous pictures) it could begin a theme... We make fun of ourselves, and our lack of scientific ethos. Humor can be used as the knowledge encoder vehicle --and this is about your science that is 'so simple a cave man could do it,' e.g. Personally, I'd like for poster sales to fund a for-profit road show slash comedy act for illustrating through mime, stage artifact, and killer graphics/video the concepts and relationships that your science is all about, and stage artifacts to do the 3D geometrical background teaching of the sonic nucleus. High school convocations would be a great market to educate (with an altruistic, ulterior motive, while reality in society only flows on revenue, which pays bills). In this edutainment show, the troop would assemble artifactual calculations on stage (or video recording set) which help the viewer 'grok' the principles the equations are about. I'm picturing a comedic Rod Serling philosopher explaining in Monty Python meta-perspective narration the Znidarsic new-millennium physics --brought to you by the Antigravity Comedy Club. With now an understanding of new physics fresh on entertained faces (a cognitive entrainment), the cliff-hanger is produced when the now meaningful artifacts are pushed around to show the geometrical appreciation for Planck's constant as a dynamical motion with its own time scale. Without realizing it, the audience now understands your insight from a kinaesthetic level. A rose is a rose by any other name. The rest of the story may portray a most dashing and dapper (and/or female counterpart) corporate scientist being helped to understand the implications (Q A with visuals) of the kinaesthetic ascription that any school kid could thereafter mentally use for reckoning sub-quantum interaction to control the natural forces. The demeanor of the corporate scientists would be sage; most wise, admirable, kind, open and receptive... to memetically pattern reaction in the audience as we each would wish we were examined. Don in AZ Agrus agRus AG R us On 11/14/2010 8:52 PM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote: I don't do anything with the Casimar force and zero point energy. According to that model the atoms radiate energy and this energy is replenished by in inflow of zero point energy. I say that the energy is in matter and is stuck there through the action of an elastic discontinuity.. It only flows out during transtion. I don't invoke the Casimir principle to slow light during the process of quantum transition. I say that the permeability of the medium increases the strength of the gravitomagnetic field. A slower velocity is required to conserve momentum as the strength of the gravitomagnteic field increases. This effect and the fact that wavefunction collapses at superlumeinal velocities (neg grav potential=positive energy) are my arguments for an increased strength of the gravitomangetic field during transtion. The matching of velcoticies mechancial and electrical are also arguemtns that the strength of the magnetic component of the forces equalsizes. I produced the probability of transition from this arguement. I don't understand your twin paradox thing. What I say is the phase angle between the potential (electric etc.) and kinetic (magnetic) competents produces the effect that we know as Special Relativity. Linked below. http://www.wbabin.net/science/znidarsic.pdf I do my own thing quite different from the rest of the world and noone understands me either. I seemed to have developed a cult following as of late and even I know not what they are doing.
[Vo]:Znidarsic's frequency tested at Fermilab ?
Hello Frank Znidarsic, An excerpt from: http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-10-holometer-universe-hologram.html This idea of the holographic universe http://www.physorg.com/tags/universe/ is not new, but physicists at Fermilab are now designing an experiment to test the idea. Fermilab particle astrophysicist Craig Hogan and others are building a holographic interferometer http://www.physorg.com/tags/interferometer/, or holometer, in an attempt to detect the noise inherent in spacetime, which would reveal the *ultimate maximum frequency limit imposed by nature*. ... After taking these precautions, any detected high-frequency noise could be the jitter of spacetime itself, or holographic noise. *The noise is expected to have a frequency of a million cycles per second*, which is a thousand times higher than what the human ear can hear, noted Fermilab experimental physicist Aaron Chou. If the experiment does find this holographic noise, it would be the first glimpse beyond our three-dimensional illusion and into the universe's true two-dimensional nature at the Planck scale. article http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-10-holometer-universe-hologram.html Though Craig Hogan says 'frequency' of one million cycles, could he be lightly referring to the Znidarsic 1,094,000 meter-second? -DonEMitchell
[Vo]:subscribe
On 10/21/2010 6:54 AM, DonEMitchell wrote: - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1136 / Virus Database: 422/3208 - Release Date: 10/20/10
[Vo]:intro and why wait?
Hello, newbie to this list. warning -- home brew philosophy here And if civilization were to crumble with a gigantic solar mass ejection causing the destruction of all satellites at once and the melt-down of the world power grid, would corporate-science revert back to being a process of investigation, rather than a dogma and creed and inviolate in the minds of the self-appointed sheriffs? Paul LaViolette paints a picture of today's corporate-academic religion of science... http://www.theorionproject.org/en/movingbeyond_laviolette.html It seems like every other scientist I get to know has a plan and proposal to begin a community or organization to shelter pure science. Rather than wait for a Mad Max world in ruins, what would be a catalyst to attract pure science into a huddle to begin a viral expansion of members that benefited from the association? I became friends with William E. Smith, Ph.D (www.odii.com) whose social paradigm having no leader was adopted to organize the electrification of Thailand, among dozens of other groups, large and small, any size works. Bill could provide a workshop where on the 3rd day we could all realize best-fit scenarios based on blended dreams with tingling excitement. And the workshop self-replicates. In Thailand the social paradigm of Appreciation-Influence-Control (for all-between some-of self) literally took over the political foundations by way of internal conversion of the actionable populous, with a complete reformation of the government to its present structure. There is zero reason why, to paraphrase the Hopi, WE cannot become THEM... Ignore scientific establishments, huddle, perhaps struggle for funding**, but proceed in a new rapidly growing community that bifurcates with celebrations into sibling groups of specialties growing a robust microeconomy of crafts of a growing intra-trade, offering the best of the best to the outer consumers... the perfect stuff in this scenario of a Gild of the Scientific Process! I'd certainly offer quite a bit of volunteer effort for the chance to be a part of a new science where things don't happen simultaneously, per Newton, and light isn't a fixed speed, toppling Einsteins relativity, etc, and yadeeya. **What science textbook states that a group of scientists cannot be supported by an expanding membership of curious lay minds subscribed for the benefit and excitement in an outer huddle, as first to know what is released from the inner huddle of true scientists. Outside would be the likes as journalists, lurking academics, corporate spies, Joe the plumber, etc. During early growth funding could be by viral member expansion similar to facebook where one's inbox becomes a leaf on a fractal tree of marketing links, the future revenue to shelter the inner gild of science process would emerge during that growth, and bloom into an educational foundation that really doesn't care what the Newtonians want to do --who would need them? My amateur research: As a rank amateur (older guy now that built motors with nails in pre-teen years, lasers and HV generators as a teen, digital circuits and industrial controls in young adulthood, then into programming in time for the grand off-shoring, and here I sit) I'm still wondering what to do with ideas, mostly... * Inductance measurement tests on torus knot coils, * search for effect of bifilar cancellation as strain on dielectric/paramagnetic core, * free energy, and all that, * and synergy with like minds on adventurous projects. * Oh! and solid geometry! I love creating POVRay ray-tracing illustration of 3D perspective ( http://portal.groupkos.com/index.php?title=Moebius_Edge_Gallery ) * (errr... and that spooky topic of holomorphic resonance of human mind with the biocosm) I hope to find a community where I can find practical advise from EEs without being attacked for the project context. Physicists, too, but so far in other list's EEs and physicists seem to be on the police force for eradicating thinking unlike theirs. Thanks for listening, and I'm always open for chat about experiments. Warm regards, Don in AZ
