[Vo]: Re: Quantum Thermodynamics

2007-03-01 Thread Jones Beene
If the curious would dump the silly rhetoric, take a moment to visit and 
study the excellent site of Professor Kowalski, they would discover that 
Michel Julian is, shall we opine metaphorically: knee deep into cold 
fusion...g ... and we on Vo should be grateful for his expert opinions 
on any related subject, even if we do not agree with them.


http://blake.montclair.edu/~kowalskil/cf/



Re: [Vo]: Re: Quantum Thermodynamics

2007-03-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Jones Beene wrote:
 If the curious would dump the silly rhetoric, take a moment to visit and
 study the excellent site of Professor Kowalski, they would discover that
 Michel Julian is, shall we opine metaphorically: knee deep into cold
 fusion...g ... and we on Vo should be grateful for his expert opinions
 on any related subject, even if we do not agree with them.

 http://blake.montclair.edu/~kowalskil/cf/



I see nothing silly about seeking truth. If what you say is true then good for 
you for being direct (saving time) and posting the link. I see Michel Jullian's 
name throughout threads, and will presume you are correct in that he's working 
on Cold Fusion and supports Free Energy research.



Regards,
Paul Lowrance



Re: [Vo]: Re: Quantum Thermodynamics

2007-03-01 Thread Michel Jullian

Paul on the pretense of saving your time and energy with your bluntness you 
are wasting everybody else's, when they obviously could be put to much better 
use.

I don't consider CF as free energy, and I am not an expert either. My 
contributions to the field are only tools and proposals which might help to 
establish indisputability of excess heat claims in CF or other desktop fusion 
experiments, nothing fundamental.

Michel

- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: Quantum Thermodynamics


...
 name throughout threads, and will presume you are correct in that he's 
 working 
 on Cold Fusion and supports Free Energy research.




Re: [Vo]: Re: Quantum Thermodynamics

2007-03-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Michel Jullian wrote:
---
 I don't consider CF as free energy,
---


Why not?




Regards,
Paul Lowrance



[Vo]: Re: Quantum Thermodynamics

2007-02-28 Thread Jones Beene
Gentlemen! ...to paraphrase Strangelove, you can't fight in here! This 
is ... well not the war room, but the war-on-oil room.




[Vo]: Re: Quantum Thermodynamics

2007-02-26 Thread Jones Beene

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

It would be more interesting if JNL could somehow measure temperature 
changes directly on the spinning magnetic material.  He could use a 
thermal gun.


That probably will not happen, but then we have Steorn

This company is an enigma to me, as their approach is so... how shall I 
say it? 'brain-dead' is a bit crude (Steve Jobs' favorite repartee) but 
not inaccurate g from everything which has appeared in print.


... but anyway... although I am more skeptical of Steorn than of the 
Newman machine, both may well demonstrate glimpses of OU at times, with 
repeatability being the salient issue.


Nevertheless, it would be ridiculously easy for Steorn (assuming that 
they even have a well-equipped laboratory, which is not a given) to take 
and datalog these measurements, and then to report the results without 
giving up a scintilla of proprietary information.


Then the question would remain (assuming a temperature drop)... can you 
trust anyone who chooses this kind of strategy to introduce an 
earth-shaking transformative technology - which supposedly is already 
patented, and which is instantly marketable by any number of large and 
cash-loaded corporate partners, if it did not come with heavy 'baggage'?


...unless, of course Steorn suspects that they a sooo-close to success, 
yet that the technology is not quite(?)= repeatable? reliable? robust? 
or whatever... and are praying to St. Patrick for some kind of 
Irish-luck miracle of insight, to be derived from the assorted experts 
who have been enticed by the hype, and who are, in effect, giving them 
free consulting services which they could never otherwise afford.


That gambit is the only scenario which makes any sense to me.

Jones



[Vo]: Re: : Quantum Thermodynamics

2007-02-26 Thread Jones Beene
Paul,

If you haven't seen this - someone may have mentioned it before - and have the 
inclination to wade through a hundred pages, which will tell you a lot about 
the Finn mentality and how they cope with interminable winters... and perhaps 
even a few pages related to what you have been looking into (p 22-26) have a 
shot at:

http://www.helsinki.fi/~matpitka/faraday.pdf

From the scarce amount of data available it would seem that there could be a 
connection between this putative phenomenon of ambient heat withdrawal, 
magnetic extropy/entopy and microwave frequencies. This is suggestive of a 
CMB-tapping mechanism.

Jones

During the self-sustained mode a cooling of the environment in the
vicinity of the magnetic system is observed. A stable fall of the common
temperature 22 C of laboratory by 6-8 degrees was observed. This suggests
violation of the second law. The sucking of energy from environment by a
phase conjugate mechanism could be involved. That phase conjugate waves
are involved was proposed also in the article of Dr. Paul la Violette [17].
Phase conjugate microwaves generated by magnetostatic waves are the best
candidate for the generalized standing waves (actually rotating around stator
magnet). The reason is that for sufficiently long wavelengths the dispersion
relation does not depend on wavelength so that arbitrary wave pattern repeats
itself periodically with a frequency which is expressible in terms of
Larmor frequencies of electron in the fields defined by the magnetization
and by the external field (now the field of roller inside stator).