Re: [Vo]:Ancient Roman Nanotech
Working. On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Tom Barnett wrote: > Hi, > Is vortex-l down for some reason? > Tom > > > On 29 August 2013 09:24, Michele Comitini > wrote: >> >> Do not underestimate old knowledge simply because it was forgotten... >> >> "It’s a popular hubris that we live in an age of unprecedented >> technological innovation – that our ancestors lived in a time where there >> were fewer technological advances, blinded as they were by their primitive >> superstitions and lack of access to the resources we have today." >> >> >> http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2013/08/25/these-two-ancient-roman-techs-could-disrupt-modern-industry/ >> >> mic > >
Re: [Vo]:Ancient Roman Nanotech
Hi, Is vortex-l down for some reason? Tom On 29 August 2013 09:24, Michele Comitini wrote: > Do not underestimate old knowledge simply because it was forgotten... > > "It’s a popular hubris that we live in an age of unprecedented > technological innovation – that our ancestors lived in a time where there > were fewer technological advances, blinded as they were by their primitive > superstitions and lack of access to the resources we have today." > > > http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2013/08/25/these-two-ancient-roman-techs-could-disrupt-modern-industry/ > > mic >
[Vo]:Ancient Roman Nanotech
Do not underestimate old knowledge simply because it was forgotten... "It’s a popular hubris that we live in an age of unprecedented technological innovation – that our ancestors lived in a time where there were fewer technological advances, blinded as they were by their primitive superstitions and lack of access to the resources we have today." http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2013/08/25/these-two-ancient-roman-techs-could-disrupt-modern-industry/ mic
