Re: [Vo]:BLP's CIHT

2011-09-18 Thread Horace Heffner


On Sep 18, 2011, at 10:54 AM, MJ wrote:



First the eCat, now BLP.  What's next?  Antigravity?

http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/975- 
undergroundbases


MJ



I wouldn't be the first time! 8^)


See the vortex-l rules:

   http://amasci.com/weird/wvort.html

   http://amasci.com/weird/vmore.html

   http://amasci.com/pathskep.html

Quoting Bill Beaty:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Vortex-L is for those who see great value in removing their usual mental
filters by provisionally accepting the validity of impossible  
phenomena
in order to test them.  This excellent quote found by Gene Mallove  
clearly
states the problem, and reveals the need for true believers in a  
science

community otherwise ruled by conservative scoffers:

  It is really quite amazing by what margins competent but  
conservative

  scientists and engineers can miss the mark, when they start with the
  preconceived idea that what they are investigating is impossible.   
When

  this happens, the most well-informed men become blinded by their
  prejudices and are unable to see what lies directly ahead of them.
   - Arthur C. Clarke, 1963

So, on Vortex-L we intentionally suspend the disbelieving attitude of
those who believe in the stereotypical scientific method.  While this
does leave us open to the great personal embarrassment of falling for
hoaxes and delusional thinking, we tolerate this problem in our quest to
consider ideas and phenomena which would otherwise be rejected out of  
hand
without a fair hearing.  There are diamonds in the filth, and we see  
that

we cannot hunt for diamonds without getting dirty.

Note that skepticism of the openminded sort is perfectly acceptable on
Vortex-L.  The ban here is aimed at scoffing and hostile disbelief,  
and

at the sort of Skeptic who angrily disbelieves all that is not solidly
proved true, while carefully rejecting all new data and observations  
which

conflict with widely accepted theory.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Best regards,

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/






Re: [Vo]:BLP's CIHT

2011-09-18 Thread Terry Blanton
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 2:54 PM, MJ feli...@gmail.com wrote:

    First the eCat, now BLP.  What's next?  Antigravity?

    http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/975-undergroundbases

Harrumph!  Not one mention of reptilians.

T



RE: [Vo]:BLP's CIHT

2011-09-17 Thread Jones Beene
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com 

 The paper is dated 2010, not 2011.

Right. That is why I am thinking that the 18 months (before publication)
will be over 'any day now' and we should be able to learn the details (at
least to the level that one 'skilled in the art' can duplicate the direct
conversion results).

Obviously, if true, this blows Rossi completely out of the water. But Mills
has been a massive disappointment to investors and observers for almost 20
years, so no one is holding their breath.

Horace suggests that enough of the technology may be covered in other
patents so that there is no new filing. That could be true, but it seems to
be completely out of character with Mills' history of massive IP filings in
the past. BLP is a patent filing machine if nothing else.

RM has mentioned direct electrical conversion in several other patents, but
a few of those involved converting UV light emission to electricity via
photocells. My favorite was the reverse gyrotron, which was the biggest
disappointment of all.

The CIHT looks to have a more direct route like a battery, where there is
possibly a pn junction involved (reminiscent of the late Paul Browns
betavoltaic battery) except employing UV instead of beta particles to
provide the emf. Is there a way to polarize UV emission in advance?
Magnetism?

Jones


-Original Message-
From: Horace Heffner 

http://tinyurl.com/28a8pxu

It would be instructive to see the patent application, which is not
mentioned in this PR release. 

An application was surely filed before the very first announcement of CIHT
was made, which could have been prior to the 18 month period normally
allotted (prior to open publication in the USA).

I've wasted and hour or two searching the recently published applications
both here and on the espace site - but to no avail. 

However, it should be out any day now ... unless some kind of secrecy
order has attached.