[Vo]:Cold fusion in your face!
We should keep calling it cold fusion, and make a barbed point of it, in honor of Fleischmann, who admittedly hated the term. Why? To stick it to the people who hounded him and smirched his reputation. Cold fusion yesterday, today, and forever! Fly the flag! MEANWHILE - I am ultra-intrigued by the magnetic anomalies mentioned. I'm working on a new approach to magnetic currents. See here: http://www.academia.edu/470454/Some_New_Thoughts_on_Magnetic_Charge The paper has some problems in the analysis of potential theory that I'm fixing, but the main conclusion stands - magnetic currents if they exist cannot be represented by simple monopoles and a vector potential. The field put forward here is new physics. --- I write a little. I erase a lot. - Chopin
Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion in your face!
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:18:43 -0700 (PDT) Danny Ross Lunsford antimatte...@yahoo.com wrote: We should keep calling it cold fusion, and make a barbed point of it, in honor of Fleischmann, who admittedly hated the term. Why? To stick it to the people who hounded him and smirched his reputation. Cold fusion yesterday, today, and forever! Fly the flag! Shouldn't it be done in honor of Pons as well? Fleischmann is dead and beyond caring, but Pons is alive, so is still, presumably, suffering from being hounded and besmirched.
RE: [Vo]:Cold fusion in your face!
Provocative paper - if I could understand the LENR implications, this would be a good time to try to fit them into current events, especially if there exists this surprisingly strong magnetic component - as DGT wants us to believe. Let's hope they quantify it soon. In fact, the purpose of this post is to encourage you to take a stab at bringing theory down to earth. Many of us here have been intrigued by Don Hotson's explication of Dirac - since it reduces complex mathematics to an understandable level by laymen. And anyone who looks at these things deeply ends up realizing that Dirac was the man. Apparently you have taken that a step further. Do you have a joe the plumber version of how magnetic charge gets involved in LENR, and especially how an aligned field would not just persist, but intensify - past the Curie point? Jones From: Danny Ross Lunsford We should keep calling it cold fusion, and make a barbed point of it, in honor of Fleischmann, who admittedly hated the term. Why? To stick it to the people who hounded him and smirched his reputation. Cold fusion yesterday, today, and forever! Fly the flag! MEANWHILE - I am ultra-intrigued by the magnetic anomalies mentioned. I'm working on a new approach to magnetic currents. See here: http://www.academia.edu/470454/Some_New_Thoughts_on_Magnetic_Charge The paper has some problems in the analysis of potential theory that I'm fixing, but the main conclusion stands - magnetic currents if they exist cannot be represented by simple monopoles and a vector potential. The field put forward here is new physics. --- I write a little. I erase a lot. - Chopin attachment: winmail.dat
Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion in your face!
Of course it should include Pons since it is quite likely that without Pons, Fleischmann would never have performed the critical experiment that resulted in the laboratory aparatus melt-down of 1984. Having said that, I have to reiterate though I agree with Danny's valuation of the phrase Cold Fusion as a colloquialism, I still must emphasize the importance of using the technical name Fleischmann Pons Phenomenon or FPP for reasons I have previously outlinedhttp://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg84740.html. Moreover, I object to substituting effect for phenomenon due to the relatively prejudicial nature of the word effect. On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 5:42 AM, Vorl Bek vorl@antichef.com wrote: On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:18:43 -0700 (PDT) Danny Ross Lunsford antimatte...@yahoo.com wrote: We should keep calling it cold fusion, and make a barbed point of it, in honor of Fleischmann, who admittedly hated the term. Why? To stick it to the people who hounded him and smirched his reputation. Cold fusion yesterday, today, and forever! Fly the flag! Shouldn't it be done in honor of Pons as well? Fleischmann is dead and beyond caring, but Pons is alive, so is still, presumably, suffering from being hounded and besmirched.
Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion in your face!
If everything carries magnetic charge as well as electric charge, and the two are always in the same ratio, then you could not detect it. The magnetic part can be duality rotated away so that it just looks like ordinary electric charge. But it is possible that in dense matter conditions, a phase difference might be induced by new physical interactions. One would then have charges and poles in mutual interaction. It is easy to set this up in the Maxwell theory but the underlying potential theory becomes ambiguous and unphysical (Dirac monopole string). This paper is essentially an examination of this issue of the potential theory of magnetic matter. Once that is resolved it becomes straightforward to couple it to matter fields. If one has demonstrably new physics, then there aren't that many places it can be hiding. But there are a few :) --- I write a little. I erase a lot. - Chopin From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com To: Danny Ross Lunsford antimatte...@yahoo.com Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 12:21 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion in your face! “It seems we have found an alternate representation of the space time theory of dyons, matter which carries both magnetic and electric charge.” So sorry please excuse me…I am attempting to figure out what physical manifestation that your theory is describing. Is it a monopole particle, a current of monopole particles, a quark, a plasmoid (vortex electron current), something else…? I don’t know math well enough to convert that abstract description into a physical engineering idea as applied to a LENR reaction. I have my idea of what “thing” is causing the strong magnetic field inside the Ni/H reactor, what is yours? On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Danny Ross Lunsford antimatte...@yahoo.com wrote: We should keep calling it cold fusion, and make a barbed point of it, in honor of Fleischmann, who admittedly hated the term. Why? To stick it to the people who hounded him and smirched his reputation. Cold fusion yesterday, today, and forever! Fly the flag! MEANWHILE - I am ultra-intrigued by the magnetic anomalies mentioned. I'm working on a new approach to magnetic currents. See here: http://www.academia.edu/470454/Some_New_Thoughts_on_Magnetic_Charge The paper has some problems in the analysis of potential theory that I'm fixing, but the main conclusion stands - magnetic currents if they exist cannot be represented by simple monopoles and a vector potential. The field put forward here is new physics. --- I write a little. I erase a lot. - Chopin
