RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:DGT Triggering Response
Axil, Your theory has a lot of good points but I think one of us has a misconception about Rydberg matter .. and it could be me so maybe we can hash out a couple things right now and at least one of us will benefit. I'll start with a the small bone to pick that I have mentioned previously is that you keep mentioning Rydberg matter when I think you mean inverse Rydberg matter if you are referencing the same hydrogen that others coin hydrino, fractional hydrogen or relativistic hydrogen, of course the term relativistic might explain the confusion because acceleration between any 2 frames will cause objects to relativistically contract regardless of polarity based on the absolute difference in velocity be it spatial displacement or equivalent acceleration. The other bone to pick is your concept that Rydberg matter can accumulate and poison the Ni - H reaction leaving a residue layer coating the powder. I agree that runaway can destroy the geometry but I have always understood it is the lattice and defects that create inverse Rydberg atoms via suppression...and I am ok even with some Rydberg atoms being created as a result of the heat anomalloy to fuel the energy needs but in either case you constantly need the geometry to maintain the inverse Rydberg state or energy to maintain the Rydberg atoms - as soon as the geometry melts the matter returns to normal state which is why Mills only claims some unusual hydride ash and cannot produce any hydrinos for examination - the odd spectrum of plasma is the closest he will ever come to producing a hydrino that can be examined in the lab. Fran From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 10:33 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:DGT Triggering Response This DGT control sequence scenario is consistent with my recently posted control mechanism for coherent proton supercurrent manipulation. In this scenario, the internal heater forms Rydberg atoms which are converted to protons (H+) by the micro powder which then join a growing coherent proton condensate. Next, Nuclear quantum mechanical processes cause protons to tunnel into the nickel nucleus to form copper. The increased heat causes more decoherence of the proton/nickel tunneling. When a set temperature is reached, a magnetic field is applied to destroy the proton condensate as well as the stockpile of Rydberg atoms. The Rossi reaction is similar to what goes on in a high temperature superconductor where Superconduction is destroyed by a strong magnetic field. The reaction stops after the magnetic field is applied and the temperature falls until a low temperature set point is reached. At that low temperature set point, the cycle begins again. The entangled proton population will then rejoin the cohertent condisate and will then begin to grow after reestablishment. If Hyperion's control/safety electronics and/or the backup safety mechanisms are also killed, then the self distructing mechanism of Hyperion automatically will destroy the inner of all reactors stoping any active reaction at once, with no catastrophic effects to the Hyperion's environment. So, there is no practical way or expected in situ situation to reach such a thermal run away in a Hyperion system. In other words, if the magnetic field is not applied to destroy proton supercurrent coherence, a thermal melt down will occur. The nano-coating of the powder will then melt and the production of protons will stop permanently. The DGT cycle will grow less reactive over time due to the buildup of Rydberg matter which poisons the Rydberg atom formation process causing quiescence. I predict that the hydrogen envelope will need to be periodically purged because in will be contaminated with a large accumulation of large molecule Rydberg matter which will interfere with proper control of the DGT burst cycle. On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:42 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.commailto:dlrober...@aol.com wrote: Defkalion has answered some interesting questions concerning their hyperion device which the collective might want to review. Check out the following link. http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24t=1038 Dave
[Vo]:DGT Triggering Response
Defkalion has answered some interesting questions concerning their hyperion device which the collective might want to review. Check out the following link. http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24t=1038 Dave
Re: [Vo]:DGT Triggering Response
This DGT control sequence scenario is consistent with my recently posted control mechanism for coherent proton supercurrent manipulation. In this scenario, the internal heater forms Rydberg atoms which are converted to protons (H+) by the micro powder which then join a growing coherent proton condensate. Next, Nuclear quantum mechanical processes cause protons to tunnel into the nickel nucleus to form copper. The increased heat causes more decoherence of the proton/nickel tunneling. When a set temperature is reached, a magnetic field is applied to destroy the proton condensate as well as the stockpile of Rydberg atoms. The Rossi reaction is similar to what goes on in a high temperature superconductor where Superconduction is destroyed by a strong magnetic field. The reaction stops after the magnetic field is applied and the temperature falls until a low temperature set point is reached. At that low temperature set point, the cycle begins again. The entangled proton population will then rejoin the cohertent condisate and will then begin to grow after reestablishment. If Hyperion's control/safety electronics and/or the backup safety mechanisms are also killed, then the self distructing mechanism of Hyperion automatically will destroy the inner of all reactors stoping any active reaction at once, with no catastrophic effects to the Hyperion's environment. So, there is no practical way or expected in situ situation to reach such a thermal run away in a Hyperion system. In other words, if the magnetic field is not applied to destroy proton supercurrent coherence, a thermal melt down will occur. The nano-coating of the powder will then melt and the production of protons will stop permanently. The DGT cycle will grow less reactive over time due to the buildup of Rydberg matter which poisons the Rydberg atom formation process causing quiescence. I predict that the hydrogen envelope will need to be periodically purged because in will be contaminated with a large accumulation of large molecule Rydberg matter which will interfere with proper control of the DGT burst cycle. On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:42 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote: Defkalion has answered some interesting questions concerning their hyperion device which the collective might want to review. Check out the following link. http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24t=1038 Dave
Re: [Vo]:DGT Triggering Response
So sorry…please excuse me, In my last post, the highlighting showing the DGT quote should be as follows: If Hyperion's control/safety electronics and/or the backup safety mechanisms are also killed, then the self distructing mechanism of Hyperion automatically will destroy the inner of all reactors stoping any active reaction at once, with no catastrophic effects to the Hyperion's environment. So, there is no practical way or expected in situ situation to reach such a thermal run away in a Hyperion system. A few more points… A life after death is caused by the gradual consumption of the proton condensate during shutdown. The minimal proton condensate must be in place at shutdown because its total desolation will cause gamma radiation as the reactor cools. Some level of quantum mechanical coherence must be maintained to eliminate the production of gamma radiation and the generation of radioactive waste products throughout the cool down procedure. On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: This DGT control sequence scenario is consistent with my recently posted control mechanism for coherent proton supercurrent manipulation. In this scenario, the internal heater forms Rydberg atoms which are converted to protons (H+) by the micro powder which then join a growing coherent proton condensate. Next, Nuclear quantum mechanical processes cause protons to tunnel into the nickel nucleus to form copper. The increased heat causes more decoherence of the proton/nickel tunneling. When a set temperature is reached, a magnetic field is applied to destroy the proton condensate as well as the stockpile of Rydberg atoms. The Rossi reaction is similar to what goes on in a high temperature superconductor where Superconduction is destroyed by a strong magnetic field. The reaction stops after the magnetic field is applied and the temperature falls until a low temperature set point is reached. At that low temperature set point, the cycle begins again. The entangled proton population will then rejoin the cohertent condisate and will then begin to grow after reestablishment. If Hyperion's control/safety electronics and/or the backup safety mechanisms are also killed, then the self distructing mechanism of Hyperion automatically will destroy the inner of all reactors stoping any active reaction at once, with no catastrophic effects to the Hyperion's environment. So, there is no practical way or expected in situ situation to reach such a thermal run away in a Hyperion system. In other words, if the magnetic field is not applied to destroy proton supercurrent coherence, a thermal melt down will occur. The nano-coating of the powder will then melt and the production of protons will stop permanently. The DGT cycle will grow less reactive over time due to the buildup of Rydberg matter which poisons the Rydberg atom formation process causing quiescence. I predict that the hydrogen envelope will need to be periodically purged because in will be contaminated with a large accumulation of large molecule Rydberg matter which will interfere with proper control of the DGT burst cycle. On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:42 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote: Defkalion has answered some interesting questions concerning their hyperion device which the collective might want to review. Check out the following link. http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24t=1038 Dave
