[Vo]:History: Stanford Robert A. Huggins positive LENr result...
Franck Ackalnd digged that old article on a sucessful LENr experiment in 89 http://www.nytimes.com/1989/04/19/us/stanford-reports-success.html I know there was many false positive at the beginning... what is the final story on that experiment? was it finally positive ? It seems too short to have a positive result as most say few month are required just for loading? Stanford Reports Success By WILLIAM J. BROAD Published: April 19, 1989 A team of scientists at Stanford University said yesterday that they had duplicated the experiment in which nuclear fusion was reportedly achieved in a jar of water at room temperature. The Stanford researchers said they measured heat but not radiation or subatomic particles that are often produced by nuclear fusion.
Re: [Vo]:History: Stanford Robert A. Huggins positive LENr result...
Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote: I know there was many false positive at the beginning... No, there were not many false positives. I know of only one or two, and they were not published. what is the final story on that experiment? was it finally positive ? It was positive, and repeated several times. See: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/SchreiberMrecentmeas.pdf It seems too short to have a positive result as most say few month are required just for loading? It takes a week or two, not months. I have never heard of an experiment that took months to load. If it does not work after a month, it never will. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:History: Stanford Robert A. Huggins positive LENr result...
This article appeared a few weeks later. http://www.nytimes.com/1989/05/03/us/physicists-debunk-claim-of-a-new-kind-of-fusion.html quote from the second page: At Stanford University, Prof. Robert A. Huggins repeated the Pons-Fleischmann experiment several weeks ago, and obtained results that seemed to suggest fusion. But Dr. Walter E. Meyerhof, professor of physics at Stanford, told scientists Monday night that he had carefully studied his colleague's apparatus and found that the experiment was flawed because of the system used to measure heat. Nevertheless, Dr. Huggins, a materials scientist, said in a telephone interview that he is ''more confident than ever'' in his results. Harry On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote: Franck Ackalnd digged that old article on a sucessful LENr experiment in 89 http://www.nytimes.com/1989/04/19/us/stanford-reports-success.html I know there was many false positive at the beginning... what is the final story on that experiment? was it finally positive ? It seems too short to have a positive result as most say few month are required just for loading? Stanford Reports Success By WILLIAM J. BROAD Published: April 19, 1989 A team of scientists at Stanford University said yesterday that they had duplicated the experiment in which nuclear fusion was reportedly achieved in a jar of water at room temperature. The Stanford researchers said they measured heat but not radiation or subatomic particles that are often produced by nuclear fusion.
Re: [Vo]:History: Stanford Robert A. Huggins positive LENr result...
so it is good... I remember about Fire From Ice that there was very negative impact of some false positive it was simply isolated failure that was exploited ? 2014-12-07 23:41 GMT+01:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com: Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote: I know there was many false positive at the beginning... No, there were not many false positives. I know of only one or two, and they were not published. what is the final story on that experiment? was it finally positive ? It was positive, and repeated several times. See: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/SchreiberMrecentmeas.pdf It seems too short to have a positive result as most say few month are required just for loading? It takes a week or two, not months. I have never heard of an experiment that took months to load. If it does not work after a month, it never will. - Jed
