RE: [Vo]:MIT suggest new physical model for condensed matter

2012-02-08 Thread Roarty, Francis X

I would argue the oscillation between atomic and molecular states of H or D 
represent the strongly coupled energy exchange with the oscillator.
The critical temp places a large gas population near disassociation threshold 
and then the oscillator slaves the tripping of the threshold so the molecules 
all disassociate in phase and then emit photons as they immediately 
re-associate. [slaved multivibrator of bond state?] The disassociations appear 
to be further aided by motion through lattice defects where changes in 
suppression value may differentiate between atomic and molecular state.
Fran

[snip]Coherent energy exchange in these models works best when the coupling 
between
Including nuclear degrees of freedom in a lattice Hamiltonian 4
the two-level transition (representing electronic and nuclear transitions) and 
oscillator
(representing a vibrational mode) is strong. We studied a further 
generalization of the
lossy spin-boson model in which two transitions are coupled to an oscillator, 
where one
is strongly-coupled and one is weakly-coupled [32]. We found that the strongly 
coupled
system could assist coherent energy exchange for the weakly coupled system. The
model that resulted appeared to us to be very closely related to excess heat 
production
in the Fleischmann-Pons experiment, assuming that the mechanism involved D2/4He
transitions that were weakly coupled to a phonon mode (weakly coupled due to the
Coulomb repulsion between the deuterons), and that a strongly-coupled 
transition were
also present. The big problem in this kind of model ends up being the 
identification
of the strongly-coupled transition. Finding an appropriate strongly-coupled 
transition
with sufficiently strong coupling to do the job seems problematic within the 
approach
[33].
After analyzing many candidate transitions, we came to the conclusion that
there were no physical transitions which could serve as the strongly-coupled 
two-level
transition within the model.[/snip] 

-Original Message-
From: David ledin [mailto:mathematic.analy...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 10:40 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:MIT suggest new physical model for condensed matter

MIT suggest new physical model for condensed matter to explain many
observations of anomalies in condensed matter systems. they named
Fleischmann , Pons and Piantelli but not rossi .

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1201.4377.pdf



[Vo]:MIT suggest new physical model for condensed matter

2012-02-07 Thread David ledin
MIT suggest new physical model for condensed matter to explain many
observations of anomalies in condensed matter systems. they named
Fleischmann , Pons and Piantelli but not rossi .

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1201.4377.pdf



Re: [Vo]:MIT suggest new physical model for condensed matter

2012-02-07 Thread Daniel Rocha
They were put in gen-ph, arxiv's trashbin. It would be better if they had
not sent it.

2012/2/7 David ledin mathematic.analy...@gmail.com

 MIT suggest new physical model for condensed matter to explain many
 observations of anomalies in condensed matter systems. they named
 Fleischmann , Pons and Piantelli but not rossi .

 http://arxiv.org/pdf/1201.4377.pdf




-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com


RE: [Vo]:MIT suggest new physical model for condensed matter

2012-02-07 Thread Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
The key phrase in the abstract is:
In the resulting model, there appears a new term in which nuclear
transitions
are coupled to lattice vibrations.

I wonder if Hagelstein has been reading Znidarsic's work?
:-)

-m

-Original Message-
From: David ledin [mailto:mathematic.analy...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 7:40 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:MIT suggest new physical model for condensed matter

MIT suggest new physical model for condensed matter to explain many
observations of anomalies in condensed matter systems. they named
Fleischmann , Pons and Piantelli but not rossi .

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1201.4377.pdf



Re: [Vo]:MIT suggest new physical model for condensed matter

2012-02-07 Thread Rich Murray
A scientific layman's quick assessment:

a gifted theoretical physicist and colleague have been working
steadily for years with experimenters --

they carefully studied and rejected many theoretical dead ends for
various anomalous phenomena --

finally they started to apply standard theoretical routes, while
starting fresh with a comprehensive overview that held the nuclear
level and the electronic level together on an equal basis --

finding new subtleties that indicate transactions between nuclear and
electronic levels that so far seem may turn out to fit the puzzling
experimental data --

publishing results quickly in many papers, thus inviting public
critical examination by their peers --

thus, all the hallmarks of mature scientific breakthrough...


On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
 The key phrase in the abstract is:
 In the resulting model, there appears a new term in which nuclear
 transitions
 are coupled to lattice vibrations.

 I wonder if Hagelstein has been reading Znidarsic's work?
 :-)

 -m

 -Original Message-
 From: David ledin [mailto:mathematic.analy...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 7:40 AM
 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
 Subject: [Vo]:MIT suggest new physical model for condensed matter

 MIT suggest new physical model for condensed matter to explain many
 observations of anomalies in condensed matter systems. they named
 Fleischmann , Pons and Piantelli but not rossi .

 http://arxiv.org/pdf/1201.4377.pdf




Re: [Vo]:MIT suggest new physical model for condensed matter

2012-02-07 Thread Terry Blanton
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Rich Murray rmfor...@gmail.com wrote:
 A scientific layman's quick assessment:

 a gifted theoretical physicist and colleague have been working
 steadily for years with experimenters --

 they carefully studied and rejected many theoretical dead ends for
 various anomalous phenomena --

 finally they started to apply standard theoretical routes, while
 starting fresh with a comprehensive overview that held the nuclear
 level and the electronic level together on an equal basis --

 finding new subtleties that indicate transactions between nuclear and
 electronic levels that so far seem may turn out to fit the puzzling
 experimental data --

 publishing results quickly in many papers, thus inviting public
 critical examination by their peers --

 thus, all the hallmarks of mature scientific breakthrough...

And your point is . . .?

T



Re: [Vo]:MIT suggest new physical model for condensed matter

2012-02-07 Thread Rich Murray
more and more, faster and faster, capable professionals will explore
this breakthrough, while we amateurs will be left yipping in the
yard...

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Rich Murray rmfor...@gmail.com wrote:

 A scientific layman's quick assessment:
...
 thus, all the hallmarks of mature scientific breakthrough...

 And your point is . . .?

 T




Re: [Vo]:MIT suggest new physical model for condensed matter

2012-02-07 Thread Axil Axil
Regarding (emphasis added):



These experimental results, and many others, have motivated us to explore
new models that might be relevant. A major issue that we have been
interested in is the *possibility of coherent energy exchange between
quantum systems with mismatched **characteristic energies*, which we
considered to be the biggest theoretical problem associated with the
anomalies. Coherent energy exchange between mismatched quantum systems
occurs in high harmonic generation [22], so we know that it is
possible in principle.
However, there seems to be no analog to Corkum’s mechanism [23],[24] present
in the condensed matter system. A lesser version of the effect is known
within the multiphoton regime of the spin-boson model, which is used to
model basic linear interactions of two-level systems with an oscillator
[25],[26],[27]. We found that if the two-level system is augmented with
loss, the coherent energy exchange rate is increased dramatically. This is
due to the fact that destructive interference limits the rate at

which coherent energy exchange occurs in the spin-boson model, so
augmenting the

model with a mechanism that removes this destructive interference would be
expected
to improve coherent energy exchange rates [28],[29],[30],[31].

Coherence transfer between systems is indeed absolutely required.

The answer to this one is clear. Rossi has told us what does this job for
him.

“no analog to Corkum’s mechanism”...micro cavities that do this job.

Micro-cavities allows protons (one quantum system) to be made coherent in
the lattice via coherent lattice photons (another quantum system).

Put some protons in a micro-cavity and shake until coherent.

Rossi’s powder does this job. In the heavy water experiments,
micro-cavities have done the same job in that system but not as intensely
as it is done by the Rossi’s powder or Piantelli’s rough surface coating.

The are many new quantum mechanical experiments done recently that show how
quantum wells transfer coherence between quantum particle types of all
kinds.

I just saw one where a photon can spin a tinny quantum wheel...light to
mechanical energy.




On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:39 AM, David ledin
mathematic.analy...@gmail.comwrote:

 MIT suggest new physical model for condensed matter to explain many
 observations of anomalies in condensed matter systems. they named
 Fleischmann , Pons and Piantelli but not rossi .

 http://arxiv.org/pdf/1201.4377.pdf




RE: [Vo]:MIT suggest new physical model for condensed matter

2012-02-07 Thread Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
Axil wrote:

There are many new quantum mechanical experiments done recently that show
how quantum wells transfer coherence between quantum particle types of all
kinds.  I just saw one where a photon can spin a tiny quantum wheel...light
to mechanical energy.

 

Here's the reference:

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v482/n7383/full/nature10787.html



Yes, there have been several developments in the last few months about
coupling between different energy types. I think the pieces of the puzzle
will be coming together this year.

-Mark

 



RE: [Vo]:MIT suggest new physical model for condensed matter

2012-02-07 Thread Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
Although not quite the same, here's another one which is quite interesting:

 

Harnessing plasmonics, engineers weld nanowires with light

http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-02-harnessing-plasmonics-weld-nanowires.htm
l

 

In before-and-after electron-microscope images, individual nanowires are
visually distinct prior to

illumination. They lay atop one another, like two fallen trees in the
forest. When illuminated, the top

nanowire acts like an antenna of sorts, directing the plasmon waves of light
into the bottom wire and

creating heat that welds the wires together. Post-illumination images show
X-like nanowires lying flat

against the substrate with fused joints.

 

-Mark

 

From: Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 11:40 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:MIT suggest new physical model for condensed matter

 

Axil wrote:

There are many new quantum mechanical experiments done recently that show
how quantum wells transfer coherence between quantum particle types of all
kinds.  I just saw one where a photon can spin a tiny quantum wheel...light
to mechanical energy.

 

Here's the reference:

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v482/n7383/full/nature10787.html

Yes, there have been several developments in the last few months about
coupling between different energy types. I think the pieces of the puzzle
will be coming together this year.

 

-Mark