[Vo]:Mesauremtn of gamma without shielding
There’s a fact that somebody don’t get, or don’t want to get. In January experiemnt, the shielding was cutted (for Villa’s detector). Bianchi used a gamma detector with 20keV – some MeV range. He placed it close to the shielding hole. No gamma radiation was measured over background. If inside the reactor there was a 10kW gamma source, with a hole in shielding, everybody had died. All these data is inside the Bianchini report, in January.
Re: [Vo]:Mesauremtn of gamma without shielding
Mattia Rizzi wrote: No gamma radiation was measured over background. If inside the reactor there was a 10kW gamma source, with a hole in shielding, everybody had died. All these data is inside the Bianchini report, in January. I do not think that contradicts Celani's findings. Celani discussed Bianchi's detector. I do not recall what he said. (I could ask him.) The burst he measured was very brief. If it had continued for a fraction of a second it would have killed everyone. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Mesauremtn of gamma without shielding
Am 07.12.2011 16:03, schrieb Jed Rothwell: Mattia Rizzi wrote: No gamma radiation was measured over background. If inside the reactor there was a 10kW gamma source, with a hole in shielding, everybody had died. All these data is inside the Bianchini report, in January. I do not think that contradicts Celani's findings. Celani discussed Bianchi's detector. I do not recall what he said. (I could ask him.) The burst he measured was very brief. If it had continued for a fraction of a second it would have killed everyone. It is immoral to discuss this because it is a trial to reveal Rossis proprietary hard earned secrets. Celani is a snake and a competitor spreading false rumours, because he wants Rossi's ruin. Rossi has already accused Celani about stealing his secrets. All people who are discussing this seriously are snakes and imbeciles. If there is anything important to know for us about gamma radiation or steam generation or energy production, Rossi will without doubt tell us. Peter
Re: [Vo]:Mesauremtn of gamma without shielding
Your sense of morality is not to talk about possible gamma radiation that could kill the observers? All of whom were assured by Rossi that it was safe? On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.dewrote: Am 07.12.2011 16:03, schrieb Jed Rothwell: Mattia Rizzi wrote: No gamma radiation was measured over background The burst he measured was very brief. If it had continued for a fraction of a second it would have killed everyone. It is immoral to discuss this because it is a trial to reveal Rossis proprietary hard earned secrets... Peter
Re: [Vo]:Mesauremtn of gamma without shielding
Am 07.12.2011 19:59, schrieb Ahsoka Tano: Your sense of morality is not to talk about possible gamma radiation that could kill the observers? All of whom were assured by Rossi that it was safe? Of course it is safe. Look at Rossi his coworkers. They look healthy. Why discuss something that obviously does not exist, and generate and spread false rumours? This is against my morality. It is a pity that no observers with real oldfashioned filmcameras where there. If there was a strong gamma burst, they should have had black and noisy negatives. Also a pity that no oldfashioned computer screen was there. This should flash. But wait! Where not fluorescent lamps there? What do these? Shouldnt they flash? How does a laptop react to gamma bursts that can kill? best regards, Peter On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.dewrote: Am 07.12.2011 16:03, schrieb Jed Rothwell: Mattia Rizzi wrote: No gamma radiation was measured over background The burst he measured was very brief. If it had continued for a fraction of a second it would have killed everyone. It is immoral to discuss this because it is a trial to reveal Rossis proprietary hard earned secrets... Peter
