________________________________
 Von: OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson <svj.orionwo...@gmail.com>
An: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> 
Gesendet: 19:54 Dienstag, 7.Februar 2012
Betreff: [Vo]:More info on: "Making Scientists Seem Human –Through Film"
 
The Scientific American blog site has more info on the recently
mentioned film "The Believers" ... about the human side of "Cold
Fusion" research.

Title:
"Making Scientists Seem Human–Through Film!"
----------------------------------
Steven,  
 
one of the
reasons I follow this whole topic, is, that it raises a lot of questions both
on a technoscientific level, as well as a psychological/societal/global level.
 
So we have
the whole package here.
 
Re the
'believers': most of them are more addicted to hope and spleens, but one should
not throw out the baby with the bathwater, right?
 
One thing
which popped up in my (scientific)mind -and I am not very deep into nuclear 
chemistry
and such, is, that we have certain dogmas, like the identity of
atomic/subatomic particles, or the prohibition of hidden particles (after
Bohm), Occam, causality, reversible time (at least in theoretical physics) then
the second sentence of thermodynamics, which are some of the axioms of Physics.

Then there
is dark matter/energy, which is to my understanding a Bohmian hidden variable 
in disguise.

 
Now, could
it be, that the Atom, say Nickel, which comes in the variants Ni58 to Ni64, and
is, concerning its isotopic variants, one of the most variable, is not so
stable as it seems?
All good
with the half-life, but I ask, why does it change ? What exactly are the
causes?
 
Can it be,
that atoms –at any time- actually have more variants than those isotopes?
This
touches one central tenet of nuclear physics, namely the 'identity' of
particles - at least within their half-life.
Which is,
as one can infer by straightforward logic, not convincing.
 
Because we
cannot look into single Atoms, we step back and and only see an ensemble-mean,
because that we can measure those.
 
Maybe the
atom-core is much more complicated, and more of a (instable) chemical element,
where the subatomic particle zoo is in permanent change, and only in the
statistical mean constitutes what we call an atom or an Isotope.
 
Just
letting my fantasy  flow.
Nothing substantial.

Reply via email to