Re: [Vo]:Superfluidity in the Hot Cat
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 08:39:31PM -0400, Axil Axil wrote: Why does this post disturb you? Because scammers don't need free press. I'd rather read about details of reproducible anomalous heat experiments.
Re: [Vo]:Superfluidity in the Hot Cat
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 03:16:39AM -0400, Axil Axil wrote: A picture of the Hot Cat being tested to destruction was shown below. The body of the reactor glowed bright red. The glow looked uniform to me except for a hot spot near the front of the reactor. The picture is shown here http://ecat.org/2013/another-look-at-the-hot-cat/ posted May 5 2013. The bright spot in front of the reactor might be coming from the mouse unit that may not be superfluid. The Hot Cat looks like it is superfluid because of the distribution of heat produced by 2 to 3 grams of nickel charge in the main (Cat) unit: This charge is essentially a point source of heat, evenly distributed throughout the entire body of the reactor. Why are you keeping posting this?
Re: [Vo]:Superfluidity in the Hot Cat
Why does this post disturb you? On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote: On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 03:16:39AM -0400, Axil Axil wrote: A picture of the Hot Cat being tested to destruction was shown below. The body of the reactor glowed bright red. The glow looked uniform to me except for a hot spot near the front of the reactor. The picture is shown here http://ecat.org/2013/another-look-at-the-hot-cat/ posted May 5 2013. The bright spot in front of the reactor might be coming from the mouse unit that may not be superfluid. The Hot Cat looks like it is superfluid because of the distribution of heat produced by 2 to 3 grams of nickel charge in the main (Cat) unit: This charge is essentially a point source of heat, evenly distributed throughout the entire body of the reactor. Why are you keeping posting this?