Re: [Vo]:Test of archive dropping posts

2011-09-21 Thread Horace Heffner

http://tinyurl.com/28a8pxu

http://tinyurl.com/3cegmxo

http://tinyurl.com/3vuopax

Best regards,

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/






[Vo]:Test of archive dropping posts

2011-09-18 Thread Horace Heffner

I noticed that only some of my posts are showing up in the archives at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/maillist.html

Any post which starts a new tread name appears to be unlikely to show  
up.


I am sending some duplicate posts of some prior posts to check this  
theory.  Sorry for the redundant posting.


Best regards,

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/






Re: [Vo]:Test of archive dropping posts

2011-09-18 Thread Horace Heffner

Weird!

I resent the Henry Dircksand BLP's CIHT posts and they did not  
show up, while the Test of archive dropping posts post immediately  
did.


I wonder if mail-archive.com is now screening screening mail for  
unwanted domain name URLs?



On Sep 18, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:

I noticed that only some of my posts are showing up in the archives  
at:


http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/maillist.html

Any post which starts a new tread name appears to be unlikely to  
show up.


I am sending some duplicate posts of some prior posts to check this  
theory.  Sorry for the redundant posting.


Best regards,

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/






Best regards,

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/






Re: [Vo]:Test of archive dropping posts

2011-09-18 Thread Horace Heffner


http://www.blacklightpower.com/Press%20Releases/ 
BlackLightHydrinoElectricity112910.htm


http://www.greenbiz.com/news/2010/02/25/ebay-walmart-google-among- 
early-adopters-fuel-cell-bloom-boxes


http://www.earthtech.org/capabilities/vwfc/

Best regards,

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/






Re: [Vo]:Test of archive dropping posts

2011-09-18 Thread Horace Heffner
It appears mail-archive.com is now screening out mail which uses  
tinyurl.com.


I go to the trouble to provide a redundant tinyurl reference as a  
courtesy, to avoid problems readers might have with line-wrap. This  
is a significant loss of function I think.


Best regards,

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/