So we all know -- or at least we _should_ all know -- about Nature's rejection of Oriani's paper reporting reproduction of the FPE which it did despite its own peer review approving the paper.
Its justification was that it flew in the face of theory and that other labs hadn't reproduced it. Setting aside, for the moment, the idiocy behind this justification, one might wonder why they published this paper: Graphene conducts electricity ten times better than expected Carbon layers grown on silicon carbide conduct electricity even better than theory predicted. Elizabeth Gibney 06 February 2014 http://www.nature.com/news/graphene-conducts-electricity-ten-times-better-than-expected-1.14676
