Re: [Vo]:Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon?
Summary: John Wallace Relativistic quantum mechanics of cold fusion As a metallurgist John Wallace is interested in ferromagnetic effects. He has studied propagation of electromagnetic waves at 1 kHz - 3 MHz in an iron bar, from which a dispersion relation can be measured. The result indicated an anomalously low effective electron mass m* ~ 10-9 mo (rest mass), which is not understood, but may be relevant to LANR, where ferromagnetic effects are probably significant. Wallace did a quantum mechanical analysis with a 3-dimensional spherical potential, with a “dimension of randomization” parameter ε = h - /mc. He assumed a 3D spherical potential, then studied the limiting case where the potential V → 0 to see the resulting quantum numbers. A high-energy electron may go into a D nucleus, resulting in a zero spin state boson, which may lead to reactions. On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 9:04 PM Terry Blanton wrote: > Thanks to Ruby Carat > > https://youtu.be/YE9y7xYb-Ek > >>
Re: [Vo]:Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon?
Thanks to Ruby Carat https://youtu.be/YE9y7xYb-Ek >
RE: [Vo]:Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon?
Brian—do you have a reference to wallasce 2009 item you identified? Bob Cook Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 From: Brian Ahern Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2019 11:30:39 AM To: bobcook39...@hotmail.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com; John Wallace Subject: Re: [Vo]:Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon? John Wallace may have the mechanism correct. His 2009 article is important. From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2019 12:37 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon? Magnetic coupling in the Tesla power device and the Manelas device is the key. The question IMHO is which physical system in the respective devices provide the potential energy assuming the vacuum is not involved. It seems the vacuum is the likely source of energy and the magnetic field taps this source of energy, not normally defined as potential energy. In a more real sense the magnetic coupling couples physical systems with the 5th dimension of quantized angular momentum and its respective real quantized potential energy. As Jones would say: “You heard it first on Vortex-l”. Bob Cook From: Brian Ahern<mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com> Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2019 3:55 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon? I think the Manelas Device corroborates Tesla. From: Harvey Norris Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2019 7:33 PM To: Yahoogroups; Heinz; Yahoogroups; Vortex List; Yahoogroups; Ljubo Vujovic; pnor...@ysu.edu Subject: [Vo]:Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon? Once again the eminent Tesla historian Bill Beaty has made good on reporting new avenues of exploration on Tesla's ideas of wireless transfer of energy on a global scale. Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon? - Quora<https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.quora.com%2FWill-we-see-Nikola-Teslas-wireless-power-return-soon=02%7C01%7C%7C8b1baf742f644d057e9508d68d23011f%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C63685157881464=fOG5GLbUaKntNnlDIzKtgUlcGDMyiGf%2Fo46j8gARrNY%3D=0> Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon? - Quora I added this comment to his post; Fantastic work on informing the public here Bill; and I can see immediate analogies with my own work where I have extracted portions of delivery from teslafy message 3639; Comparisons of Capacitive Energy Movements in the 666 machine. * In the ferromagnetic transformer case VI (in) = VI (out). This then is a transformation of reactive measurements where the gain of voltage by the secondary is accompanied a inversely proportional loss of amperage on the circuit. When three phase air core transformers are used in proper mutual inductance a situation where the reactive output can exceed the reactive input not only is possible, but is logical when the true parameters are shown. The whole issue becomes a confusion between a linear relationship and that of an exponential one. This is illustrated by the deception of the missing energy argument. If an energy storage as a capacitor is discharged to an equal capacitor, the energy content before and after is cut in half. Where did the missing energy go? When the transformation is viewed from the linear side we have two changes that of the voltage and the equivalent change in capacity where C goes up by two, and V is cut in half. Now view in comparison to what is happening on the true power transfer side of things where an exponential relationship exists.(.5) C*V squared indicates the energy content. By transforming the situation where C is doubled and V squared is cut in half for equivalent transformations this means an entirely different thing on the energy side of the equation. Now cutting V in half reduces V squared four fold; and to compensate C is only doubled; creating the observation that half of the energy has been lost in the transformation. Now just imagine if we could manipulate this situation in reverse only here the ratios of capacitive change are 272/1. * In the experimentation with resonant 60hz air core energy exchanges between large and small coils balanced for resonance this ratio was only ~20/1 between inductive ratios, yet the same phenomenon revealed itself. In this case scenario almost a doubling of energy in transfer was made when sending that energy from a large capacity to a smaller one using the magnetic fields of the coils as the transfer agent. And reciprocally when the energy transfer was made in reverse between the intermediary coils a 50% loss of that energy was shown; EXACTLY SIMILAR TO THE LINE CONNECTION MODEL FOR REDISTRIBUTING (STORED)ENERGY FROM A SMALL CONTAINER TO A TWICE LARGE
Re: [Vo]:Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon?
John Wallace may have the mechanism correct. His 2009 article is important. From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2019 12:37 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon? Magnetic coupling in the Tesla power device and the Manelas device is the key. The question IMHO is which physical system in the respective devices provide the potential energy assuming the vacuum is not involved. It seems the vacuum is the likely source of energy and the magnetic field taps this source of energy, not normally defined as potential energy. In a more real sense the magnetic coupling couples physical systems with the 5th dimension of quantized angular momentum and its respective real quantized potential energy. As Jones would say: “You heard it first on Vortex-l”. Bob Cook From: Brian Ahern<mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com> Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2019 3:55 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon? I think the Manelas Device corroborates Tesla. From: Harvey Norris Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2019 7:33 PM To: Yahoogroups; Heinz; Yahoogroups; Vortex List; Yahoogroups; Ljubo Vujovic; pnor...@ysu.edu Subject: [Vo]:Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon? Once again the eminent Tesla historian Bill Beaty has made good on reporting new avenues of exploration on Tesla's ideas of wireless transfer of energy on a global scale. Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon? - Quora<https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.quora.com%2FWill-we-see-Nikola-Teslas-wireless-power-return-soon=02%7C01%7C%7C8b1baf742f644d057e9508d68d23011f%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C63685157881464=fOG5GLbUaKntNnlDIzKtgUlcGDMyiGf%2Fo46j8gARrNY%3D=0> Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon? - Quora I added this comment to his post; Fantastic work on informing the public here Bill; and I can see immediate analogies with my own work where I have extracted portions of delivery from teslafy message 3639; Comparisons of Capacitive Energy Movements in the 666 machine. * In the ferromagnetic transformer case VI (in) = VI (out). This then is a transformation of reactive measurements where the gain of voltage by the secondary is accompanied a inversely proportional loss of amperage on the circuit. When three phase air core transformers are used in proper mutual inductance a situation where the reactive output can exceed the reactive input not only is possible, but is logical when the true parameters are shown. The whole issue becomes a confusion between a linear relationship and that of an exponential one. This is illustrated by the deception of the missing energy argument. If an energy storage as a capacitor is discharged to an equal capacitor, the energy content before and after is cut in half. Where did the missing energy go? When the transformation is viewed from the linear side we have two changes that of the voltage and the equivalent change in capacity where C goes up by two, and V is cut in half. Now view in comparison to what is happening on the true power transfer side of things where an exponential relationship exists.(.5) C*V squared indicates the energy content. By transforming the situation where C is doubled and V squared is cut in half for equivalent transformations this means an entirely different thing on the energy side of the equation. Now cutting V in half reduces V squared four fold; and to compensate C is only doubled; creating the observation that half of the energy has been lost in the transformation. Now just imagine if we could manipulate this situation in reverse only here the ratios of capacitive change are 272/1. * In the experimentation with resonant 60hz air core energy exchanges between large and small coils balanced for resonance this ratio was only ~20/1 between inductive ratios, yet the same phenomenon revealed itself. In this case scenario almost a doubling of energy in transfer was made when sending that energy from a large capacity to a smaller one using the magnetic fields of the coils as the transfer agent. And reciprocally when the energy transfer was made in reverse between the intermediary coils a 50% loss of that energy was shown; EXACTLY SIMILAR TO THE LINE CONNECTION MODEL FOR REDISTRIBUTING (STORED)ENERGY FROM A SMALL CONTAINER TO A TWICE LARGER ONE. Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
RE: [Vo]:Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon?
Magnetic coupling in the Tesla power device and the Manelas device is the key. The question IMHO is which physical system in the respective devices provide the potential energy assuming the vacuum is not involved. It seems the vacuum is the likely source of energy and the magnetic field taps this source of energy, not normally defined as potential energy. In a more real sense the magnetic coupling couples physical systems with the 5th dimension of quantized angular momentum and its respective real quantized potential energy. As Jones would say: “You heard it first on Vortex-l”. Bob Cook From: Brian Ahern<mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com> Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2019 3:55 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon? I think the Manelas Device corroborates Tesla. From: Harvey Norris Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2019 7:33 PM To: Yahoogroups; Heinz; Yahoogroups; Vortex List; Yahoogroups; Ljubo Vujovic; pnor...@ysu.edu Subject: [Vo]:Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon? Once again the eminent Tesla historian Bill Beaty has made good on reporting new avenues of exploration on Tesla's ideas of wireless transfer of energy on a global scale. Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon? - Quora<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.quora.com%2FWill-we-see-Nikola-Teslas-wireless-power-return-soon=02%7C01%7C%7Cb5366e871fbb423d8a9708d683ef317d%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636841460677417828=ACYfXqGDE5t0v2G6mkOfaBC0TPZfSTZugV21YDrOSo4%3D=0> Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon? - Quora I added this comment to his post; Fantastic work on informing the public here Bill; and I can see immediate analogies with my own work where I have extracted portions of delivery from teslafy message 3639; Comparisons of Capacitive Energy Movements in the 666 machine. * In the ferromagnetic transformer case VI (in) = VI (out). This then is a transformation of reactive measurements where the gain of voltage by the secondary is accompanied a inversely proportional loss of amperage on the circuit. When three phase air core transformers are used in proper mutual inductance a situation where the reactive output can exceed the reactive input not only is possible, but is logical when the true parameters are shown. The whole issue becomes a confusion between a linear relationship and that of an exponential one. This is illustrated by the deception of the missing energy argument. If an energy storage as a capacitor is discharged to an equal capacitor, the energy content before and after is cut in half. Where did the missing energy go? When the transformation is viewed from the linear side we have two changes that of the voltage and the equivalent change in capacity where C goes up by two, and V is cut in half. Now view in comparison to what is happening on the true power transfer side of things where an exponential relationship exists.(.5) C*V squared indicates the energy content. By transforming the situation where C is doubled and V squared is cut in half for equivalent transformations this means an entirely different thing on the energy side of the equation. Now cutting V in half reduces V squared four fold; and to compensate C is only doubled; creating the observation that half of the energy has been lost in the transformation. Now just imagine if we could manipulate this situation in reverse only here the ratios of capacitive change are 272/1. * In the experimentation with resonant 60hz air core energy exchanges between large and small coils balanced for resonance this ratio was only ~20/1 between inductive ratios, yet the same phenomenon revealed itself. In this case scenario almost a doubling of energy in transfer was made when sending that energy from a large capacity to a smaller one using the magnetic fields of the coils as the transfer agent. And reciprocally when the energy transfer was made in reverse between the intermediary coils a 50% loss of that energy was shown; EXACTLY SIMILAR TO THE LINE CONNECTION MODEL FOR REDISTRIBUTING (STORED)ENERGY FROM A SMALL CONTAINER TO A TWICE LARGER ONE. Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
Re: [Vo]:Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon?
I think the Manelas Device corroborates Tesla. From: Harvey Norris Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2019 7:33 PM To: Yahoogroups; Heinz; Yahoogroups; Vortex List; Yahoogroups; Ljubo Vujovic; pnor...@ysu.edu Subject: [Vo]:Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon? Once again the eminent Tesla historian Bill Beaty has made good on reporting new avenues of exploration on Tesla's ideas of wireless transfer of energy on a global scale. Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon? - Quora<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.quora.com%2FWill-we-see-Nikola-Teslas-wireless-power-return-soon=02%7C01%7C%7Cb5366e871fbb423d8a9708d683ef317d%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636841460677417828=ACYfXqGDE5t0v2G6mkOfaBC0TPZfSTZugV21YDrOSo4%3D=0> <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.quora.com%2FWill-we-see-Nikola-Teslas-wireless-power-return-soon=02%7C01%7C%7Cb5366e871fbb423d8a9708d683ef317d%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636841460677427833=rV3x7JRTw9CtZNwWgUy0h2k8uKrZy%2Felpf2i5ybh%2FJU%3D=0> Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon? - Quora I added this comment to his post; Fantastic work on informing the public here Bill; and I can see immediate analogies with my own work where I have extracted portions of delivery from teslafy message 3639; Comparisons of Capacitive Energy Movements in the 666 machine. * In the ferromagnetic transformer case VI (in) = VI (out). This then is a transformation of reactive measurements where the gain of voltage by the secondary is accompanied a inversely proportional loss of amperage on the circuit. When three phase air core transformers are used in proper mutual inductance a situation where the reactive output can exceed the reactive input not only is possible, but is logical when the true parameters are shown. The whole issue becomes a confusion between a linear relationship and that of an exponential one. This is illustrated by the deception of the missing energy argument. If an energy storage as a capacitor is discharged to an equal capacitor, the energy content before and after is cut in half. Where did the missing energy go? When the transformation is viewed from the linear side we have two changes that of the voltage and the equivalent change in capacity where C goes up by two, and V is cut in half. Now view in comparison to what is happening on the true power transfer side of things where an exponential relationship exists.(.5) C*V squared indicates the energy content. By transforming the situation where C is doubled and V squared is cut in half for equivalent transformations this means an entirely different thing on the energy side of the equation. Now cutting V in half reduces V squared four fold; and to compensate C is only doubled; creating the observation that half of the energy has been lost in the transformation. Now just imagine if we could manipulate this situation in reverse only here the ratios of capacitive change are 272/1. * In the experimentation with resonant 60hz air core energy exchanges between large and small coils balanced for resonance this ratio was only ~20/1 between inductive ratios, yet the same phenomenon revealed itself. In this case scenario almost a doubling of energy in transfer was made when sending that energy from a large capacity to a smaller one using the magnetic fields of the coils as the transfer agent. And reciprocally when the energy transfer was made in reverse between the intermediary coils a 50% loss of that energy was shown; EXACTLY SIMILAR TO THE LINE CONNECTION MODEL FOR REDISTRIBUTING (STORED)ENERGY FROM A SMALL CONTAINER TO A TWICE LARGER ONE. Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
[Vo]:Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon?
Once again the eminent Tesla historian Bill Beaty has made good on reporting new avenues of exploration on Tesla's ideas of wireless transfer of energy on a global scale.Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon? - Quora | | | | | | | | | | | Will we see Nikola Tesla's wireless power return soon? - Quora | | | I added this comment to his post;Fantastic work on informing the public here Bill; and I can see immediate analogies with my own work where I have extracted portions of delivery from teslafy message 3639; Comparisons of Capacitive Energy Movements in the 666 machine. - In the ferromagnetic transformer case VI (in) = VI (out). This then is a transformation of reactive measurements where the gain of voltage by the secondary is accompanied a inversely proportional loss of amperage on the circuit. When three phase air core transformers are used in proper mutual inductance a situation where the reactive output can exceed the reactive input not only is possible, but is logical when the true parameters are shown. The whole issue becomes a confusion between a linear relationship and that of an exponential one. This is illustrated by the deception of the missing energy argument. If an energy storage as a capacitor is discharged to an equal capacitor, the energy content before and after is cut in half. Where did the missing energy go? When the transformation is viewed from the linear side we have two changes that of the voltage and the equivalent change in capacity where C goes up by two, and V is cut in half. Now view in comparison to what is happening on the true power transfer side of things where an exponential relationship exists.(.5) C*V squared indicates the energy content. By transforming the situation where C is doubled and V squared is cut in half for equivalent transformations this means an entirely different thing on the energy side of the equation. Now cutting V in half reduces V squared four fold; and to compensate C is only doubled; creating the observation that half of the energy has been lost in the transformation. Now just imagine if we could manipulate this situation in reverse only here the ratios of capacitive change are 272/1. - In the experimentation with resonant 60hz air core energy exchanges between large and small coils balanced for resonance this ratio was only ~20/1 between inductive ratios, yet the same phenomenon revealed itself. In this case scenario almost a doubling of energy in transfer was made when sending that energy from a large capacity to a smaller one using the magnetic fields of the coils as the transfer agent. And reciprocally when the energy transfer was made in reverse between the intermediary coils a 50% loss of that energy was shown; EXACTLY SIMILAR TO THE LINE CONNECTION MODEL FOR REDISTRIBUTING (STORED)ENERGY FROM A SMALL CONTAINER TO A TWICE LARGER ONE. Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
