[Vo]:Worry About Wandering Planets?

2013-12-19 Thread David Roberson
I have been enjoying the Planets simulation on my Linux system and noticed 
something that gave me a bit of concern.   Perhaps some of my fellow vorts have 
information concerning the issue that I am about to mention which sheds light 
upon the real danger.

When I play with a system that contains a large multitude of planet like 
objects generated randomly within a small region of space I see that in every 
case many of the objects are ejected from the region at a high rate of speed 
into open space.  I am not too confident that the program does a great 
simulation of the real process since it operates in 2 dimensions only while the 
real systems use 3.

My concern is that this process would typically send a large number of 
dangerous mass objects into the region between stars and as a consequence some 
in our direction.The ones that cross our orbit could lead to a catastrophe 
if they were to collide with the earth.  The objects that do not collide would 
likely continue on their paths through space and out the other side of our 
solar system.

Is there reason to consider this situation as dangerous and is there evidence 
that this has happened before?  Today, most of the comets and asteroids are 
considered in orbit around our sun, but is that the only condition?

How close to earth would an asteroid need to pass before it is detected by our 
systems?  And, if the size were large enough to cause an extinction level 
event, would we see it before it was too late?

It is fairly well established that the history of earth has included many 
extinction events and they have generally been assumed to be from objects in 
orbit around the sun.  Does anyone know of any proof that none from way out 
there has impacted us?

I recall reading about a period of earth's history where a large quantity of 
collisions came after the earth was similar to today.  This happened when the 
earth was millions if not a billion years old and since the sun was formed 
along with numerous brothers, perhaps some of the ejections from it's twins 
caused the event.  The delay would have give them enough time to reach us from 
adjacent star systems if traveling at a high velocity.

Do we have reason to worry?

Dave


Re: [Vo]:Worry About Wandering Planets?

2013-12-19 Thread Axil Axil
yes


On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 4:48 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:

 I have been enjoying the* Planets* simulation on my Linux system and
 noticed something that gave me a bit of concern.   Perhaps some of my
 fellow vorts have information concerning the issue that I am about to
 mention which sheds light upon the real danger.

 When I play with a system that contains a large multitude of planet like
 objects generated randomly within a small region of space I see that in
 every case many of the objects are ejected from the region at a high rate
 of speed into open space.  I am not too confident that the program does a
 great simulation of the real process since it operates in 2 dimensions only
 while the real systems use 3.

 My concern is that this process would typically send a large number of
 dangerous mass objects into the region between stars and as a consequence
 some in our direction.The ones that cross our orbit could lead to a
 catastrophe if they were to collide with the earth.  The objects that do
 not collide would likely continue on their paths through space and out the
 other side of our solar system.

 Is there reason to consider this situation as dangerous and is there
 evidence that this has happened before?  Today, most of the comets and
 asteroids are considered in orbit around our sun, but is that the only
 condition?

 How close to earth would an asteroid need to pass before it is detected by
 our systems?  And, if the size were large enough to cause an extinction
 level event, would we see it before it was too late?

 It is fairly well established that the history of earth has included many
 extinction events and they have generally been assumed to be from objects
 in orbit around the sun.  Does anyone know of any proof that none from way
 out there has impacted us?

 I recall reading about a period of earth's history where a large quantity
 of collisions came after the earth was similar to today.  This happened
 when the earth was millions if not a billion years old and since the sun
 was formed along with numerous brothers, perhaps some of the ejections from
 it's twins caused the event.  The delay would have give them enough time to
 reach us from adjacent star systems if traveling at a high velocity.

 Do we have reason to worry?

 Dave



Re: [Vo]:Worry About Wandering Planets?

2013-12-19 Thread ChemE Stewart
Double yes.  Best get our DNA spread far and wide as soon as possible

On Thursday, December 19, 2013, Axil Axil wrote:

 yes


 On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 4:48 PM, David Roberson 
 dlrober...@aol.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'dlrober...@aol.com');
  wrote:

 I have been enjoying the* Planets* simulation on my Linux system and
 noticed something that gave me a bit of concern.   Perhaps some of my
 fellow vorts have information concerning the issue that I am about to
 mention which sheds light upon the real danger.

 When I play with a system that contains a large multitude of planet like
 objects generated randomly within a small region of space I see that in
 every case many of the objects are ejected from the region at a high rate
 of speed into open space.  I am not too confident that the program does a
 great simulation of the real process since it operates in 2 dimensions only
 while the real systems use 3.

 My concern is that this process would typically send a large number of
 dangerous mass objects into the region between stars and as a consequence
 some in our direction.The ones that cross our orbit could lead to a
 catastrophe if they were to collide with the earth.  The objects that do
 not collide would likely continue on their paths through space and out the
 other side of our solar system.

 Is there reason to consider this situation as dangerous and is there
 evidence that this has happened before?  Today, most of the comets and
 asteroids are considered in orbit around our sun, but is that the only
 condition?

 How close to earth would an asteroid need to pass before it is detected
 by our systems?  And, if the size were large enough to cause an extinction
 level event, would we see it before it was too late?

 It is fairly well established that the history of earth has included many
 extinction events and they have generally been assumed to be from objects
 in orbit around the sun.  Does anyone know of any proof that none from way
 out there has impacted us?

 I recall reading about a period of earth's history where a large quantity
 of collisions came after the earth was similar to today.  This happened
 when the earth was millions if not a billion years old and since the sun
 was formed along with numerous brothers, perhaps some of the ejections from
 it's twins caused the event.  The delay would have give them enough time to
 reach us from adjacent star systems if traveling at a high velocity.

 Do we have reason to worry?

 Dave





Re: [Vo]:Worry About Wandering Planets?

2013-12-19 Thread Axil Axil
Previous research has predicted there might be 100,000 times more rogue
planets in the Milky Way than stars.

Read more:
http://www.universetoday.com/104210/rogue-planets-could-form-on-their-own-in-interstellar-space/#ixzz2nxcPwnsI


On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 4:59 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:

 Double yes.  Best get our DNA spread far and wide as soon as possible


 On Thursday, December 19, 2013, Axil Axil wrote:

 yes


 On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 4:48 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.comwrote:

 I have been enjoying the* Planets* simulation on my Linux system and
 noticed something that gave me a bit of concern.   Perhaps some of my
 fellow vorts have information concerning the issue that I am about to
 mention which sheds light upon the real danger.

 When I play with a system that contains a large multitude of planet like
 objects generated randomly within a small region of space I see that in
 every case many of the objects are ejected from the region at a high rate
 of speed into open space.  I am not too confident that the program does a
 great simulation of the real process since it operates in 2 dimensions only
 while the real systems use 3.

 My concern is that this process would typically send a large number of
 dangerous mass objects into the region between stars and as a consequence
 some in our direction.The ones that cross our orbit could lead to a
 catastrophe if they were to collide with the earth.  The objects that do
 not collide would likely continue on their paths through space and out the
 other side of our solar system.

 Is there reason to consider this situation as dangerous and is there
 evidence that this has happened before?  Today, most of the comets and
 asteroids are considered in orbit around our sun, but is that the only
 condition?

 How close to earth would an asteroid need to pass before it is detected
 by our systems?  And, if the size were large enough to cause an extinction
 level event, would we see it before it was too late?

 It is fairly well established that the history of earth has included
 many extinction events and they have generally been assumed to be from
 objects in orbit around the sun.  Does anyone know of any proof that none
 from way out there has impacted us?

 I recall reading about a period of earth's history where a large
 quantity of collisions came after the earth was similar to today.  This
 happened when the earth was millions if not a billion years old and since
 the sun was formed along with numerous brothers, perhaps some of the
 ejections from it's twins caused the event.  The delay would have give them
 enough time to reach us from adjacent star systems if traveling at a high
 velocity.

 Do we have reason to worry?

 Dave





Re: [Vo]:Worry About Wandering Planets?

2013-12-19 Thread David Roberson
Yipes!  Do you feel lucky?

Dave

 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 19, 2013 4:59 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Worry About Wandering Planets?


Previous research has predicted there might be 100,000 times more rogue planets 
in the Milky Way than stars.

Read more: 
http://www.universetoday.com/104210/rogue-planets-could-form-on-their-own-in-interstellar-space/#ixzz2nxcPwnsI




On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 4:59 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:

Double yes.  Best get our DNA spread far and wide as soon as possible


On Thursday, December 19, 2013, Axil Axil  wrote:

yes



On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 4:48 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:

I have been enjoying the Planets simulation on my Linux system and noticed 
something that gave me a bit of concern.   Perhaps some of my fellow vorts have 
information concerning the issue that I am about to mention which sheds light 
upon the real danger.

When I play with a system that contains a large multitude of planet like 
objects generated randomly within a small region of space I see that in every 
case many of the objects are ejected from the region at a high rate of speed 
into open space.  I am not too confident that the program does a great 
simulation of the real process since it operates in 2 dimensions only while the 
real systems use 3.

My concern is that this process would typically send a large number of 
dangerous mass objects into the region between stars and as a consequence some 
in our direction.The ones that cross our orbit could lead to a catastrophe 
if they were to collide with the earth.  The objects that do not collide would 
likely continue on their paths through space and out the other side of our 
solar system.

Is there reason to consider this situation as dangerous and is there evidence 
that this has happened before?  Today, most of the comets and asteroids are 
considered in orbit around our sun, but is that the only condition?

How close to earth would an asteroid need to pass before it is detected by our 
systems?  And, if the size were large enough to cause an extinction level 
event, would we see it before it was too late?

It is fairly well established that the history of earth has included many 
extinction events and they have generally been assumed to be from objects in 
orbit around the sun.  Does anyone know of any proof that none from way out 
there has impacted us?

I recall reading about a period of earth's history where a large quantity of 
collisions came after the earth was similar to today.  This happened when the 
earth was millions if not a billion years old and since the sun was formed 
along with numerous brothers, perhaps some of the ejections from it's twins 
caused the event.  The delay would have give them enough time to reach us from 
adjacent star systems if traveling at a high velocity.

Do we have reason to worry?

Dave










Re: [Vo]:Worry About Wandering Planets?

2013-12-19 Thread James Bowery
The kind of numeric simulation you describe almost certainly is not
conserving energy due to the failure to appropriately handle close perigees
with tiny time increments in the numeric approximation.  That's the main
reason why these things produce high speed projectiles.


On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 3:48 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:

 I have been enjoying the* Planets* simulation on my Linux system and
 noticed something that gave me a bit of concern.   Perhaps some of my
 fellow vorts have information concerning the issue that I am about to
 mention which sheds light upon the real danger.

 When I play with a system that contains a large multitude of planet like
 objects generated randomly within a small region of space I see that in
 every case many of the objects are ejected from the region at a high rate
 of speed into open space.  I am not too confident that the program does a
 great simulation of the real process since it operates in 2 dimensions only
 while the real systems use 3.

 My concern is that this process would typically send a large number of
 dangerous mass objects into the region between stars and as a consequence
 some in our direction.The ones that cross our orbit could lead to a
 catastrophe if they were to collide with the earth.  The objects that do
 not collide would likely continue on their paths through space and out the
 other side of our solar system.

 Is there reason to consider this situation as dangerous and is there
 evidence that this has happened before?  Today, most of the comets and
 asteroids are considered in orbit around our sun, but is that the only
 condition?

 How close to earth would an asteroid need to pass before it is detected by
 our systems?  And, if the size were large enough to cause an extinction
 level event, would we see it before it was too late?

 It is fairly well established that the history of earth has included many
 extinction events and they have generally been assumed to be from objects
 in orbit around the sun.  Does anyone know of any proof that none from way
 out there has impacted us?

 I recall reading about a period of earth's history where a large quantity
 of collisions came after the earth was similar to today.  This happened
 when the earth was millions if not a billion years old and since the sun
 was formed along with numerous brothers, perhaps some of the ejections from
 it's twins caused the event.  The delay would have give them enough time to
 reach us from adjacent star systems if traveling at a high velocity.

 Do we have reason to worry?

 Dave



Re: [Vo]:Worry About Wandering Planets?

2013-12-19 Thread Jed Rothwell
David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:

Yipes!  Do you feel lucky?


Well . . . Do ya, punk?

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Worry About Wandering Planets?

2013-12-19 Thread David Roberson
That might be the case, but the sling shot effect is used by NASA all the time 
to sling probes into the far off regions.  And the simulation appears to show 
that one of the interacting objects has its velocity and hence orbital path 
greatly disturbed by the interaction.  I suspect it is not totally rubbish.

Dave

 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 19, 2013 5:10 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Worry About Wandering Planets?


The kind of numeric simulation you describe almost certainly is not conserving 
energy due to the failure to appropriately handle close perigees with tiny time 
increments in the numeric approximation.  That's the main reason why these 
things produce high speed projectiles.



On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 3:48 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:

I have been enjoying the Planets simulation on my Linux system and noticed 
something that gave me a bit of concern.   Perhaps some of my fellow vorts have 
information concerning the issue that I am about to mention which sheds light 
upon the real danger.

When I play with a system that contains a large multitude of planet like 
objects generated randomly within a small region of space I see that in every 
case many of the objects are ejected from the region at a high rate of speed 
into open space.  I am not too confident that the program does a great 
simulation of the real process since it operates in 2 dimensions only while the 
real systems use 3.

My concern is that this process would typically send a large number of 
dangerous mass objects into the region between stars and as a consequence some 
in our direction.The ones that cross our orbit could lead to a catastrophe 
if they were to collide with the earth.  The objects that do not collide would 
likely continue on their paths through space and out the other side of our 
solar system.

Is there reason to consider this situation as dangerous and is there evidence 
that this has happened before?  Today, most of the comets and asteroids are 
considered in orbit around our sun, but is that the only condition?

How close to earth would an asteroid need to pass before it is detected by our 
systems?  And, if the size were large enough to cause an extinction level 
event, would we see it before it was too late?

It is fairly well established that the history of earth has included many 
extinction events and they have generally been assumed to be from objects in 
orbit around the sun.  Does anyone know of any proof that none from way out 
there has impacted us?

I recall reading about a period of earth's history where a large quantity of 
collisions came after the earth was similar to today.  This happened when the 
earth was millions if not a billion years old and since the sun was formed 
along with numerous brothers, perhaps some of the ejections from it's twins 
caused the event.  The delay would have give them enough time to reach us from 
adjacent star systems if traveling at a high velocity.

Do we have reason to worry?

Dave






Re: [Vo]:Worry About Wandering Planets?

2013-12-19 Thread David Roberson
So far so good! :-)

Dave

 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 19, 2013 5:15 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Worry About Wandering Planets?



David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:


Yipes!  Do you feel lucky?



Well . . . Do ya, punk?


- Jed