From: francis [mailto:froarty...@comcast.net]
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 10:04 PM
To: 'a...@lomaxdesign.com'
Subject: RE: [Vo]:The Summer of ECat
Abd,
You just did the same thing as Jones in reverse by stating Pd-D is
definitely nuclear based on resulting helium. If these reactions are related
then the common denominator is Zero Point chemistry as the initial
exothermic reaction - It clearly can lead to nuclear reactions but is
already capable of energy production on a nuclear scale by endlessly
reversing an exothermic chemical reaction using ZPE of gas motion relative
to rapid changes in casimir geometry. The frequencies of these reversals can
be even higher than those Jones mentions if Naudts proposal about the
hydrino being relativistic turn out to be correct because it means time is
accelerated as the energy density is suppressed and the reactions would
occur exponentially faster from our perspective. The catalytic action would
be from the rapid change in energy density but the average density due to
Casimir geometry between powder grains and in pores will be substantially
lower than the isotropic value of larger geometries.
At 05:38 PM 5/27/2011, Jones Beene wrote:
It may be tough for LENR proponents to swallow, but they better start
getting used to the likelihood that this Ni-H effect is NOT nuclear.
On Fri, 27 May 2011 16:53 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax replied
That's way, way to soon to say. Speculating on mechanism is far, far
premature. I'm with Dr. Storms in the economy of speculation: start first by
speculating that there is some common cause or mechanism behind PdD and NiH
reactions. That's just a reasonable place to start, not some kind of proof
of something! And PdD most definitely is nuclear. Deuterium -> Helium, in
short.
