Re: [Vo]: Re: Magnetic Vortices Charged Water

2006-08-09 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to  Willis Jenkin's message of Sat, 5 Aug 2006 14:55:44
-0700:
Hi Willis,
[snip]
Robin!

On your response to my posting on ‘some’ in the field using pulsed DC and
still obtaining gas production (H2, O2), below 1.2V, please be assured that
it was not measured with a DC volt meter, more like a $25K US Tek Scope and
followed with a standard formula of  Vrms=Sqrt(y/x)* Vp, where Vp is the
pulse max V, y is the pulse width and x is leading edge to leading edge.

Does this mean that the 1.2 V you were referring to was Vrms or
peak?

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

Competition provides the motivation,
Cooperation provides the means.



Re: [Vo]: Re: Magnetic Vortices Charged Water

2006-08-06 Thread Terry Blanton

On 8/2/06, Willis Jenkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


The Teflon pan may not be the best of containers to try your test in, I
might suggest a liter beaker or some HDPE container. What I have observed is
that a passive metal container is part of the circuit, if connected or not.
Over the years many a SS container has suffered microscopic pin holes when
being used in this way.


Well, well, well.  You were absolutely right.  When I finished the
experiment today and stored the water, I noticed some very small
bubbles forming between the teflon and the aluminum.  Doesn't look
like it totally erupted, however; but, I think I'll seek out an HDPE
container for stage two.

Also, the adhesive gave out on one pair of plates.  Further research
indicates that 3M does not recommend it on SS.  Go figure.  I'm trying
to decide whether to put a rubber band around it, tie a string around
it, or just skip the 24 VDC test until I can rebuild the cell.

Terry



Re: [Vo]: Re: Magnetic Vortices Charged Water

2006-08-04 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to  Willis Jenkin's message of Wed, 2 Aug 2006 12:34:36
-0700:
Hi,
[snip]
I must say that when you do not see gas being evolved that you are working
closer to strickly ohmic conduction versus ionic. Also you will not be able
to stop gas once you exceed as Robin stated ~ 1.2V. Although some in the
field have evolved gas below this level with the proper supply (pulsed DC).

If a simple voltmeter on the DC scale is being used to measure the
voltage, then it's not likely to be registering the peak voltage
in a pulsed setup, so while it might appear that lower pulsed
voltages result in gas formation, it's possible that the gas is
actually only being produced during the actual peak of the pulse,
where it exceeds ~ 1.2 V.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

Competition provides the motivation,
Cooperation provides the means.



RE: [Vo]: Re: Magnetic Vortices Charged Water

2006-08-03 Thread patrick

 Terry wrote:
 We will start with his oldest vehicle which he can no longer
 depreciate.  He knows the risks.  The rewards far outweigh his risk.
 Even a 10% improvement pays back in a little over a year.

 I mainly want to see if there's any difference due to charging.

Terry/Jones (no Python jokes, please ;-),

I know that I caused some confusion earlier by not explicitly mentioning the
effects of multiple 'neutral' plates, but now I'm confused...

I thought that you were both looking at some basic experimental work, to
investigate the possibility of 100% gas-free ICE running (the putative
'waterfuel').  Is this not the case?

If not, and you're (Terry) looking to create a hydroxy booster setup, then
there's some well established techniques/cell designs that you could use -
see the Y! hydroxy group.

It would be handy to know which way you're both going, so that any
observations that I or others might offer will be pertinent to your aims.

Cheers,
Patrick




RE: [Vo]: Re: Magnetic Vortices Charged Water

2006-08-02 Thread Frederick Sparber
 I went over our 12 plate (~ 1.0 cm spacing) with my cohort/lackey with
a starting voltage of about 9 volts at 1.6 ma on the rechargeable power
unit there
were small bubbles on the water-plastic interface near the anode plate too.
The rechargeable dc supply was brought up to ~ 13 vdc and the current
maxed at less than 2.0 ma for a day or so until baking soda was added to
increase it to about 19 ma.  Adding borax the next day increased the
current to almost an ampere.

Fred

Jones Beene wrote.

 Terry,

  Gee, I don't see how you can get 50 mA with 12 VDC with neat 
  water.
  I'm only getting 1.1 mA with 9 VDC.  Larger surface area?

 The cell Patrick is talking about has only two or three neutral 
 plates - you have 16 total - 14 neutral, correct? Your 
 plate-to-plate voltage drop in tiny.

 The neutral plates would divide the voltage drop, which you want 
 to be under about 1.2 per plate so that electrolysis does NOT take 
 place, but close to that level so that the max current can flow 
 w/o gas forming.

 With 16 plates you can probably use 20 volts. Do you have a 
 wall-wart near that level? Some of the HP large block transformers 
 that they used to sell with their printers are 24 volts ... What 
 about using two wall-warts in series? you have so many free wires 
 you could use the plates one and sixteen (like now) and the attach 
 the second leads to plates 5 and 11, or some such series 
 arrangement.

 or else try to find a block with more ripple or else what about - 
 one AC and one DC? sounds weird ... you could use the DC on the 
 end plates:one and sixteen (like now) and the attach the AC on 
 plates 5 and 11, or some such arrangement to get the net current 
 WAY up from what it is now

 Jones






Re: [Vo]: Re: Magnetic Vortices Charged Water

2006-08-02 Thread Terry Blanton

On 8/2/06, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


With 16 plates you can probably use 20 volts. Do you have a
wall-wart near that level? Some of the HP large block transformers
that they used to sell with their printers are 24 volts ... What
about using two wall-warts in series? you have so many free wires
you could use the plates one and sixteen (like now) and the attach
the second leads to plates 5 and 11, or some such series
arrangement.


Okay.  I have a hefty 24 V xfmr and two twelve volt batteries.  I'll
finish out the week with the present config and put the sample in
storage.  (Masonic jar? eg)

For sample two, I'll kick it up a notch to 24V with distilled water.

I've found a volunteer to test the final hydrobooster in one of his
fleet vehicles which gets 17.1 mpg.  He said if I can get a 30% boost
in his mileage, I can do all his fleet for $600 each.  His drivers go
30,000 mi/yr.  His fuel cost is $5200 per vehicle per year; so, his
savings would be $1,560 per year.

I figure my material cost would be around $100 per unit.  All the
parts (and day labor) are available at Home Despot. :-)

Terry

You want franchises with that?



Re: [Vo]: Re: Magnetic Vortices Charged Water

2006-08-02 Thread Terry Blanton

On 8/2/06, Willis Jenkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


What ever this may be worth, otherwise sorry for taking your time.


No no!!  This is just the information we need.  I love it when a
lurker joins in.  I'm getting bored talking to the same old farts.
;-)

Do you have a picture of your setup?  If you can' t post it, send it
to my email address and I'll post it for you.

Terry



Re: [Vo]: Re: Magnetic Vortices Charged Water

2006-08-02 Thread Terry Blanton

On 8/2/06, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Whoa... that might be a bit hasty. I think you will see a 30%
boost if the device is properly built and sized, etc. but there
are so many unanswered questions about long term corrosion, etc.

John Steck mentioned this briefly. If the valves go prematurely,
then all the savings and more are quickly eaten up.

... at least get a big product liability insurance policy !!


Geeze, you sound like an attorney. ;-)

We will start with his oldest vehicle which he can no longer
depreciate.  He knows the risks.  The rewards far outweigh his risk.
Even a 10% improvement pays back in a little over a year.

I mainly want to see if there's any difference due to charging.

Terry



Re: [Vo]: Re: Magnetic Vortices Charged Water Picture

2006-08-02 Thread Terry Blanton

WJ's setup is here:

http://geocities.com/terry1094/wtrchg.jpg

Willis,

How long have you been charging in this photo?  Is there an
electrolyte?  If so, what kind (NaCl, KOH, etc)?  Voltage and current?

TIA

Terry

On 8/2/06, Willis Jenkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Here is a simple unit, 500ml distilled (farm grade), 12mm carbon cathode,
two 2mm SS rod anodes. Input voltage 4.6V at 6.4mA.

Doesn't show much but I will send it anyway.

Thanks...







Re: [Vo]: Re: Magnetic Vortices Charged Water Picture

2006-08-02 Thread Terry Blanton

On 8/2/06, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Terry

Willis already answered your questions in the same post ... must
be a hot afternoon in Hot-lanta... g


Yeah, and since Iana.org took over the Inet, nothing has been right.

However, I have some bad news.  I tested experimental and control
water and got no BAM effect.

Then, thinking about homemade icecream and Grimer, (what a
combination!), I took some (5 ml)  charged water and added a few
grains of NaCl.

Well, it fuggin' chimed (with a 30 Hz buzz) and exploded.  So did the
(5 ml sample) control.

Sorry.

Terry

PS Ain't changin' my procedure, however.



Re: [Vo]: Re: Magnetic Vortices Charged Water Picture

2006-08-02 Thread Terry Blanton

On 8/2/06, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Still hopeful that Terry can make some unsalted BAM water ...


It's still chargin'!

BTW, Blanton distilleries make some premium bourbon:

http://www.blantonsbourbon.com

But don't snipe at that:

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/07/25/highway.shootings.ap/index.html

(He looks like my cousin Jimmy.)

Terry