RE: FW: WHAT'S NEW Friday, August 06, 2004
Terry Blanton wrote: He said it was poor taste which implies intent. Oh. I saw that comment but somehow I did not see it was from Park himself. His behavior is bizarre. His comment does not seem like a joke, but more like confusion. - Jed
RE: FW: WHAT'S NEW Friday, August 06, 2004
This has to be some sort of mistake or misunderstanding. It is not anyone's idea of a joke, not even Park's. I suppose he was lazy and he did not even bother to call the magazine. - Jed
Re: FW: WHAT'S NEW Friday, August 06, 2004
Jed Rothwell wrote: This has to be some sort of mistake or misunderstanding. It is not anyone's idea of a joke, not even Park's. I suppose he was lazy and he did not even bother to call the magazine. He said it was poor taste which implies intent.
RE: FW: WHAT'S NEW Friday, August 06, 2004
I'd ask him personally, but I don't want to provoke him any more that I already have... and will... At 02:51 PM 8/8/2004 -0400, you wrote: This has to be some sort of mistake or misunderstanding. It is not anyone's idea of a joke, not even Park's. I suppose he was lazy and he did not even bother to call the magazine. - Jed
RE: FW: WHAT'S NEW Friday, August 06, 2004
No, I think this is Park's idea of a joke--you can just bet that as soon as the news broke that Gene was dead, someone or other made sure Park heard about it. The man has not shown an ounce of class for as long as he's been doing his column, so why should he start now? Kooistra This has to be some sort of mistake or misunderstanding. It is not anyone's idea of a joke, not even Park's. I suppose he was lazy and he did not even bother to call the magazine. - Jed
