Jones,
My understanding is that as clever as the Patterson cell was, there was
something in the beads that was important to the success. When the supply of
beads was used up, the effect vanished. This has happened before, in other
industries. At one time Motorola offer to buy him out but his CEO grandson
thought they could do better and refused. Motorola might have had the
resources to analyze everything.
The Case cell also required an undocumented magic touch to work. When the
source of the carbonaceous carrier was used up, the effect went away also.
FP were most successful with cathodes from a specific ingot prepared by JM
which has not been duplicated.
The 'secret' of the Nuclear Active Enviroment is still elusive.
Mike Carrell
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 11:29 AM
Subject: [Vo]:Beads to Gold
Vo-
Four part video and interviews with the late James
Patterson; includes assorted figures like George Miley
were put up on YouTube yesterday.
Well done. This is a must-see for the LENR crowd even
if you already caught some of the 12 year-old original
footage-
Pt 1 is here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUQfYw_HEJs
uses the index for finding the others.
Charlie Gibson and Michael Guillen did the original
shorter excerpts for this in 1996 for ABC's 'Good
Morning, America'.
Patterson was greatly offended, and slandered, by the
sick and misguided self-appointed expert, Robert
Park... probably singled out because of the favorable
TV exposure (seen in these vids) and the fact that
nothing important (or fully replicated) has yet to
come out of the CETI tech(so far)
I hope I live long enough to see Patterson's cell
legitimized. He was a competent and diligent inventor,
and deserves his share of acclaim instead of the
ridicule heaped on him from the misguided mainstream
of physics.
Jones
This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T.
Department.