Re: [Vo]:God created the solids, the devil their surfaces. (Pauli)
what makes the rorld work? But it is so simple- it's its ambition o be as interesting as possible. I guess you have not read my essay at FQXI. Peter On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:12 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson < orionwo...@charter.net> wrote: > Terry sez: > > > Tout le monde est encore deviner ce qui le fait fonctionner. On ne sait > pas. > > Dieu merci pour Google Translate: > > "Everyone is still guessing what makes it work. We do not know." > > Regards, > > Steven Vincent Johnson > svjart.orionworks.com > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
RE: [Vo]:God created the solids, the devil their surfaces. (Pauli)
Terry sez: > Tout le monde est encore deviner ce qui le fait fonctionner. On ne sait pas. Dieu merci pour Google Translate: "Everyone is still guessing what makes it work. We do not know." Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson svjart.orionworks.com
Re: [Vo]:God created the solids, the devil their surfaces. (Pauli)
Tout le monde est encore deviner ce qui le fait fonctionner. On ne sait pas.
Re: [Vo]:God created the solids, the devil their surfaces. (Pauli)
See an other relevant quote in my ancient CF paper: http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/GluckPunderstand.pdf Nanoplasmonics is the way of surface to make miracles. However still the majority of CFers (see tthje recent MIT Colloquium) think CF happens in the bulk. Comedie des erreurs, ou tragedie? Peter On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote: > http://blog.disorderedmatter.eu/2009/03/16/wolfgang-pauli-speaking/ > > following the quote that Mats lewan mad in his book on pauli and > semiconductors, > "One shouldn't work on semiconductors, that is a filthy mess; who knows > if they really exist!" > > I fall on that evident quote of pauli > > http://blog.disorderedmatter.eu/2009/03/16/wolfgang-pauli-speaking/ > > "God created the solids, the devil their surfaces. (Pauli)" > > I think that for LENR it should be adapted as probably the NAE is not even > the surface, but something more diabolic (vacancies, defects). > > It seems science did not advance much since the 1920s, about maturity. > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com