Re: Response to some questions
RC Macaulay wrote: Hi Anon, No at all, Vorts are by nature , looking for trouble.. err, make that answers that may trouble.. or ,, may provoke troubling doubts.. or.. may trouble provokitoors.. or may provoke thought and discovery.. ah! the quest., the quest.. Imagine the posts regarding UFO's and alien invasions mentioned recently.. What if the aliens are all FEMALE just searching for a male ??? hehe.. they came, they looked, they saw men 40-80 lbs overweight and decided they weren't up to it..errr.. poor choice of words.. but the threat of invasion and conquest may have been averted.. not by NASA and our military.. but by the big Mac. Richard - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 7:52 PM Subject: Re: Response to some questions Attitude, mon ami. I will no longer trouble you. -Original Message- From: Steven Krivit ___ Try the New Netscape Mail Today! Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage | Import Your Contact List http://mail.netscape.com Just think of us as two parts energy myth busters [as per the TV show], one part enwergy quiz master, one part new energy coordination, with a side order of energy jokes. I still haven't figgured out whats OT on Vort yet. But its fun.
Re: Response to some questions
Cher Anon, N'est pas l'attitude. Your question is an important one, but I just did not wish to repeat what I have already gone to great lengths to present and publish. My reference is here: Slide 16 Why Is This Cold Fusion? - Apparent nuclear energy from hydrogen at low temperatures - Apparent branching ratio favoring helium and not neutrons or gamma. SVP, I want to hear your thoughts. I do not know everything. I just listen to other wise people and learn from them. Steve
Re: Response to some questions
Hi Anon, No at all, Vorts are by nature , looking for trouble.. err, make that answers that may trouble.. or ,, may provoke troubling doubts.. or.. may trouble provokitoors.. or may provoke thought and discovery.. ah! the quest., the quest.. Imagine the posts regarding UFO's and alien invasions mentioned recently.. What if the aliens are all FEMALE just searching for a male ??? hehe.. they came, they looked, they saw men 40-80 lbs overweight and decided they weren't up to it..errr.. poor choice of words.. but the threat of invasion and conquest may have been averted.. not by NASA and our military.. but by the big Mac. Richard - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 7:52 PM Subject: Re: Response to some questions Attitude, mon ami. I will no longer trouble you. -Original Message- From: Steven Krivit ___ Try the New Netscape Mail Today! Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage | Import Your Contact List http://mail.netscape.com
Re: Response to some questions
Attitude, mon ami. I will no longer trouble you. -Original Message- From: Steven Krivit ___ Try the New Netscape Mail Today! Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage | Import Your Contact List http://mail.netscape.com
Re: Response to some questions
Hi Anon, One of the hopes of reporting new energy technology is to stimulate ideas and information transfer. It would be of great service if you would build a Griggs type cavitation device and test it using heavy water. The question would then be answered by the one that poses it with the added benefit we would all learn something. Richard - Original Message - From: "Steven Krivit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 6:44 PM Subject: Re: Response to some questions Hello Mr. Anon, Please have a look/listen to what I write/say in my presentation/video about hot vs cold and tell me your thoughts. Steve At 02:05 PM 12/5/2005, you wrote: If the references provided by Mr. Beene relate to what you are terming hydraulic-electrostatic cold fusion, it is anything but cold. It sounds much more like Tessian's plans for bubble fusion which is likely unrelated to the Fleischmann/Pons effect. I have often wondered if Griggs cavitating heater would have benefited from inclusion of heavy water.
Re: Response to some questions
Hello Mr. Anon, Please have a look/listen to what I write/say in my presentation/video about hot vs cold and tell me your thoughts. Steve At 02:05 PM 12/5/2005, you wrote: If the references provided by Mr. Beene relate to what you are terming hydraulic-electrostatic cold fusion, it is anything but cold. It sounds much more like Tessian's plans for bubble fusion which is likely unrelated to the Fleischmann/Pons effect. I have often wondered if Griggs cavitating heater would have benefited from inclusion of heavy water.
Re: Response to some questions
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If the references provided by Mr. Beene relate to what you are terming hydraulic-electrostatic cold fusion, it is anything but cold. It sounds much more like Tessian's plans for bubble fusion which is likely unrelated to the Fleischmann/Pons effect. I have often wondered if Griggs cavitating heater would have benefited from inclusion of heavy water. Many people have wondered about that. Gene Mallove once dumped some heavy water into the Griggs gadget tank. The amount was very small compared to the total amount of water in the tank, but it was enough to increase the concentration of heavy water hundreds of times compared to ordinary water. It had no measurable effect. By the way, Hydro Dynamics has improved their web site and they now have lots of good pictures and better proof that the device is producing massive cavitation effects, including a video. See: http://www.hydrodynamics.com/product_pics.htm http://www.hydrodynamics.com/videos/video01.wmv - Jed
Re: Response to some questions
If the references provided by Mr. Beene relate to what you are terming hydraulic-electrostatic cold fusion, it is anything but cold. It sounds much more like Tessian's plans for bubble fusion which is likely unrelated to the Fleischmann/Pons effect. I have often wondered if Griggs cavitating heater would have benefited from inclusion of heavy water. Knuke's cavitator certainly liked having a few extra neutrons around! -Original Message- From: Steve Krivit I would have to say that the comments made to me regarding energy balance are, as yet, undocumented, and without confidence. The best thing I've got is verbally each and independently from McKubre, Hagelstein and Fleischmann that there seems to be a very clear and certain excess heat effect. So, moving on to a quantitative analysis of the Px is next. However, IMO, even a minor Px is significant considering the fact that this appears to be 100% repeatable and controllable. My goal is to bring an independent engineer to one of the labs in Canada to perform an audit and get the data we all seek. s ___ Try the New Netscape Mail Today! Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage | Import Your Contact List http://mail.netscape.com
Response to some questions
I can answer this on V: My question is, did you get a chance to see the energy balance? E.g. how much energy was input by the high pressure pump, how much by the spark, how much did they get out? I would have to say that the comments made to me regarding energy balance are, as yet, undocumented, and without confidence. The best thing I've got is verbally each and independently from McKubre, Hagelstein and Fleischmann that there seems to be a very clear and certain excess heat effect. So, moving on to a quantitative analysis of the Px is next. However, IMO, even a minor Px is significant considering the fact that this appears to be 100% repeatable and controllable. My goal is to bring an independent engineer to one of the labs in Canada to perform an audit and get the data we all seek. s
