Re: Shell and Arie DeGeus
Thanks Mark Goldes for making mention of the connection with DeGeus and Shell. As I recall the news article , Shell emphasized the point that Shell was spending their research money on hydrogen. Looking at the background of Shell's new US head, I see he has worked with the "right" people .. like GE etc. Why do I get the feeling the winners have already been decided before the game is played grin Richard Blank Bkgrd.gif
Re: Shell and Arie DeGeus
Shell has spent some time visiting DeGeus who would appear to be BLPs chief, and perhaps only, competitor. His namesake headed Shell for some years, and Arie has a second home in the Netherlands. Their is a family connection. The DeGeus fractional hydrogen system uses a proprietary metal alloy as fuel. When we visited him a few years ago Shell straddled our visit. They decided not to support his work at that time, but it could have simply been too early. He believed they would become a logical Strategic Partner for his work. Perhaps they have. Mark From: RC Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: vortex-l@eskimo.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: BLP implementation path Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 22:16:39 -0500 There are credible sources that also question BLP supposed claims. Granted they have moved the subject ahead but the due diligence remains in stage. A recent interview carried by the Houston Chronicle with the new head of Shell Oil USA is revealing. The new head stated that Shell is spending money on hydrogen technology.. emphasizing the point. hmmm. These people have the money to set the rules for the game over the next 10 years. Perhaps GM and Ford understand this better than Toyota. Richard - Original Message - From: Standing Bear [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 11:14 AM Subject: Re: BLP implementation path On Thursday 14 April 2005 15:15, Mike Carrell wrote: In the current discussion of a post-peak-oil world, the usual alternatives have been worked over thoroughly, and found unsatisfactory. An important factor is perceptions of the future. While expansion and a better future are seen as possible, people will dream, hope, invest and work to make it real. If that perception turns to gloom and doom and no light at the end of the tunnel, the collapse of international commerce and investment markets may be swift. A workable road map to a better future will help. This drives the workers and supporters of LENR technology, but it seems a bit beyond reach at the moment. There is a likely alternative in Black Light Power. For those here who have not studied it I will give a sketch of its features and status, with links to specific data. After a decade of RD, with publication of theory and experiments, privately funded Black Light Power has entered a phase of negotiation with a number of potential product development partners who are doing serious due diligence studies of the BLP technology, including replication of critical effects in their own laboratories. Many 'new energy' comapnies have made this claim. All I can say is that I have credible sources and my own analysis of what has been presented in publications and on the BLP website. Papers on key aspect of BLP technology have been published in the Journal of Applied Physics and other senior technical journals in the US and abroad. Mills has been very active in refining his theory and developing visualizations of the orbitsphere elctron model to aid third party consultants retained by managements of prospective partners. He has recently lectured to audiences in Holland. ...goes on to long letter... Good use for it. Another use may be to utilize it for rocket propulsion. There was a government funded study that stopped short of testing the power of this rocket. Then nothing. Probably working now and highly classified. This just may have been the real ticket for actual operation of the recently cancelled single stage to orbit shuttle, one of the 'X' series, X43 or something...could look it up but some of you know of this anyway. What we need is a good single stage to orbit shuttle. Would'nt this be nice if it worked? Standing Bear
Re: Shell and Arie DeGeus (with spelling error corrected)
Shell has spent some time visiting DeGeus who would appear to be BLPs chief, and perhaps only, competitor. His namesake headed Shell for some years, and Arie has a second home in the Netherlands. There is a family connection. The DeGeus fractional hydrogen system uses a proprietary metal alloy as fuel. When we visited him a few years ago Shell straddled our visit. They decided not to support his work at that time, but it could have simply been too early. He believed they would become a logical Strategic Partner for his work. Perhaps they have. Mark From: RC Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: vortex-l@eskimo.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: BLP implementation path Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 22:16:39 -0500 There are credible sources that also question BLP supposed claims. Granted they have moved the subject ahead but the due diligence remains in stage. A recent interview carried by the Houston Chronicle with the new head of Shell Oil USA is revealing. The new head stated that Shell is spending money on hydrogen technology.. emphasizing the point. hmmm. These people have the money to set the rules for the game over the next 10 years. Perhaps GM and Ford understand this better than Toyota. Richard - Original Message - From: Standing Bear [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 11:14 AM Subject: Re: BLP implementation path On Thursday 14 April 2005 15:15, Mike Carrell wrote: In the current discussion of a post-peak-oil world, the usual alternatives have been worked over thoroughly, and found unsatisfactory. An important factor is perceptions of the future. While expansion and a better future are seen as possible, people will dream, hope, invest and work to make it real. If that perception turns to gloom and doom and no light at the end of the tunnel, the collapse of international commerce and investment markets may be swift. A workable road map to a better future will help. This drives the workers and supporters of LENR technology, but it seems a bit beyond reach at the moment. There is a likely alternative in Black Light Power. For those here who have not studied it I will give a sketch of its features and status, with links to specific data. After a decade of RD, with publication of theory and experiments, privately funded Black Light Power has entered a phase of negotiation with a number of potential product development partners who are doing serious due diligence studies of the BLP technology, including replication of critical effects in their own laboratories. Many 'new energy' comapnies have made this claim. All I can say is that I have credible sources and my own analysis of what has been presented in publications and on the BLP website. Papers on key aspect of BLP technology have been published in the Journal of Applied Physics and other senior technical journals in the US and abroad. Mills has been very active in refining his theory and developing visualizations of the orbitsphere elctron model to aid third party consultants retained by managements of prospective partners. He has recently lectured to audiences in Holland. ...goes on to long letter... Good use for it. Another use may be to utilize it for rocket propulsion. There was a government funded study that stopped short of testing the power of this rocket. Then nothing. Probably working now and highly classified. This just may have been the real ticket for actual operation of the recently cancelled single stage to orbit shuttle, one of the 'X' series, X43 or something...could look it up but some of you know of this anyway. What we need is a good single stage to orbit shuttle. Would'nt this be nice if it worked? Standing Bear
