Re: [Vo]:Hydrino validation?
Sorry Jones, I have no way to detect UV spectral lines with this setup. Even though the 1500 l/mm diffraction grating I used can pass UV wavelenghts down to about 255 nm it's unlikely they would get through the soda-lime glass jar and the microwave oven door. 27.2 eV and 13.6 eV are way into the vacuum ultraviolet and would be blocked by almost any common substances. Some of the sparking looks a little too far from the surface of the glass container to be contaminated by it and there's a lot of sodium spectrum being displayed. So something strange is going on, I think. On Friday, June 11, 2021, 10:30:56 PM GMT+1, Jones Beene wrote: Most interesting, Michael. It would be even more so (to Mills' investors :-) ... if there had been some of the Mills' UV lines as predicted - 27.2 eV , 13.6 eV and so on. Did you see any UV lines at all? Michael Foster wrote: I tried this and it looks really kewl indeed. The potassium chloride I used was pure enough that if you do a simple flame test, you don't get any of that yellow-orange sodium color. I watched the sparking with a 1500 lpm diffraction grating and the double D lines of sodium are way too bright to be accounted for from the potassium chloride. So it's either transmutation (unlikely), or the energy produced by the sparking is enough to remove some sodium from the wall of the glass container. I didn't see any of the characteristic hydrino spectral lines :-)
Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers
The biggest crime is still ongoing. Companies like Merck (+ vaccine makers) actively bribe CDD/FDA/WHO to not allow *IVERMECTIN *for CoV-19 treatment. Now the USA state mafia tops this and donates 1.2 billion to Merck for an already failed drug. See statement of Dr. Kory: https://vimeo.com/562286662 With IVERMECTIN we would have only a few 1000 victims from CoV-19. India currently only uses *IVERMECTIN.* India cases overall did go down 7x. Delhi that started early has now - after 7 weeks - about 131 cases/day far below USA level. So you have to learn: Big Pharma does not hesitate to kill you with bad drugs if they want to make money. J.W. On 16.06.2021 00:07, Michael Foster wrote: I read a lot of scientific papers covering a broad variety of subjects. It's how I amuse myself, even though I am not a scientist. Some people play golf, I read scientific papers. I'm sure many of you on this list have noticed that papers on research payed for with your tax dollars are not available to the the public except through for-profit companies who will charge you an arm and a leg for them. The companies that do this are literally making billions doing this. Nice, huh? I can often dodge the pay wall by searching for one of the authors who may have published a paper on the same subject somewhere else. Why should I or anyone else have to pay to read about research that I and other taxpayers have already bought? Given the state of the world today, I was reading a lot of papers on PubMed, the NIH website, where you could read literally thousands of papers covering medical research. Only about a week ago, I read one that was the most horrifying evidence of collusion between our benevolent government and Big Pharma. I was going to post the conclusion and summary of this research here for all of you to read and a link to the paper. Guess what? That paper has vanished and you can now only read abstracts of the papers on PubMed. You now must go the usual private company and pay to read research available for free only days ago. I unfortunately didn't save the link or the whole PDF because I thought I could find it again with a few key words as I had before. All gone. I will give you what I remember to the best of my ability the summary and conclusion of the research in question. It stated flatly through two double blind clinical trials that those suffering from HIV/AIDS could have their immune function restored by taking n-acetyl cysteine, an inexpensive and easily obtained supplement. The effect was raising the glutathione levels in the body. Glutathione is the master anti-oxidant in the human body. You could say that glutathione IS the immune system. What I'm saying is that this sort of information while formerly available to anyone looking for it and the ability to understand it, was not likely to attract attention, given the type of specialist study that it was. So, for lack of informing the general public of this research, HIV sufferers are paying nearly $120 per day for medication from Big Pharma versus a few cents per day for the n-acetyl cysteine. I don't know about you guys, but I would call that a crime. -- Jürg Wyttenbach Bifangstr. 22 8910 Affoltern am Albis +41 44 760 14 18 +41 79 246 36 06
Re: [Vo]:Hydrino validation?
I like the sound of "something strange going on." Heck, it might be worthwhile to try various mixtures of KCl and NaCl to see if there is an obvious particular ratio where the sparking is maximized. Mills uses a pinhole technique for finding UV where he actually drills a sub-mm hole into the reactor wall with line of sight to the plasma, and mounts and glues a photocell UV detector chip over the hole - but that is for a vacuum reactor. Robin may have experience with this...? Michael Foster wrote: Some of the sparking looks a little too far from the surface of the glass container to be contaminated by it and there's a lot of sodium spectrum being displayed. So something strange is going on, I think.
Re: [Vo]:Hydrino validation?
Mike: There may be transmutation of potassium to sodium going on. The cessation of the sparking before all the water boils off may indicate that the majority of the potassium has been transmuted to sodium since the potassium carries the reaction and sodium does not. Initially in order to establish a baseline, check for sodium before sparking the solution to establish sodium is not present in the potassium salt. After the sparking stops, test for sodium. Vaporize the salt and look for the yellow spectrum bands. On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 4:24 PM Michael Foster wrote: > Sorry Jones, I have no way to detect UV spectral lines with this setup. > Even though the 1500 l/mm diffraction grating I used can pass UV > wavelenghts down to about 255 nm it's unlikely they would get through the > soda-lime glass jar and the microwave oven door. 27.2 eV and 13.6 eV are > way into the vacuum ultraviolet and would be blocked by almost any common > substances. > > Some of the sparking looks a little too far from the surface of the glass > container to be contaminated by it and there's a lot of sodium spectrum > being displayed. So something strange is going on, I think. > > > On Friday, June 11, 2021, 10:30:56 PM GMT+1, Jones Beene < > jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > > Most interesting, Michael. It would be even more so (to Mills' investors > :-) ... if there had been some of the Mills' UV lines as predicted - 27.2 > eV , 13.6 eV and so on. > > Did you see any UV lines at all? > > > > > Michael Foster wrote: > > I tried this and it looks really kewl indeed. The potassium chloride I > used was pure enough that if you do a simple flame test, you don't get any > of that yellow-orange sodium color. I watched the sparking with a 1500 lpm > diffraction grating and the double D lines of sodium are way too bright to > be accounted for from the potassium chloride. So it's either transmutation > (unlikely), or the energy produced by the sparking is enough to remove some > sodium from the wall of the glass container. > > I didn't see any of the characteristic hydrino spectral lines :-) > > >
[Vo]:Scientific Papers
I read a lot of scientific papers covering a broad variety of subjects. It's how I amuse myself, even though I am not a scientist. Some people play golf, I read scientific papers. I'm sure many of you on this list have noticed that papers on research payed for with your tax dollars are not available to the the public except through for-profit companies who will charge you an arm and a leg for them. The companies that do this are literally making billions doing this. Nice, huh? I can often dodge the pay wall by searching for one of the authors who may have published a paper on the same subject somewhere else. Why should I or anyone else have to pay to read about research that I and other taxpayers have already bought? Given the state of the world today, I was reading a lot of papers on PubMed, the NIH website, where you could read literally thousands of papers covering medical research. Only about a week ago, I read one that was the most horrifying evidence of collusion between our benevolent government and Big Pharma. I was going to post the conclusion and summary of this research here for all of you to read and a link to the paper. Guess what? That paper has vanished and you can now only read abstracts of the papers on PubMed. You now must go the usual private company and pay to read research available for free only days ago. I unfortunately didn't save the link or the whole PDF because I thought I could find it again with a few key words as I had before. All gone. I will give you what I remember to the best of my ability the summary and conclusion of the research in question. It stated flatly through two double blind clinical trials that those suffering from HIV/AIDS could have their immune function restored by taking n-acetyl cysteine, an inexpensive and easily obtained supplement. The effect was raising the glutathione levels in the body. Glutathione is the master anti-oxidant in the human body. You could say that glutathione IS the immune system. What I'm saying is that this sort of information while formerly available to anyone looking for it and the ability to understand it, was not likely to attract attention, given the type of specialist study that it was. So, for lack of informing the general public of this research, HIV sufferers are paying nearly $120 per day for medication from Big Pharma versus a few cents per day for the n-acetyl cysteine. I don't know about you guys, but I would call that a crime.
Re: [Vo]:Hydrino validation?
Potassium atoms are strongly sensitive to a magnetic field. This could relate to what is happening in the experiment where microwave radiation is applied to KCl (at least in the sense of ultra strong coupling to the gigahertz waves from the oven.) The most sensitive magnetometer available , named SERF - comes from Princeton and consists of a cell containing potassium vapor and a buffer gas. The unpaired electrons on the potassium atoms are spin-polarized so that a probe detects the precession of spin in the presence of a magnetic field. This device is capable of incredible sensitivities on the order of 10-18 Tesla, 1000 times more sensitive than a SQUID detector. Thus microwave radiation, already efficient, can be utilized in a more efficient way - perhaps becoming strongly ionizing and splitting water. IOW it is possible that the extreme spin sensitivity of potassium to RF is a little understood effect -- maybe one looking for an application. - I like the sound of "something strange going on." Heck, it might be worthwhile to try various mixtures of KCl and NaCl to see if there is an obvious particular ratio where the sparking is maximized. Mills uses a pinhole technique for finding UV where he actually drills a sub-mm hole into the reactor wall with line of sight to the plasma, and mounts and glues a photocell UV detector chip over the hole - but that is for a vacuum reactor. Robin may have experience with this...? Michael Foster wrote: Some of the sparking looks a little too far from the surface of the glass container to be contaminated by it and there's a lot of sodium spectrum being displayed. So something strange is going on, I think.
Re: [Vo]:Hydrino validation?
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 15 Jun 2021 22:45:37 + (UTC): Hi, [snip] >I like the sound of "something strange going on." >Heck, it might be worthwhile to try various mixtures of KCl and NaCl to see if >there is an obvious particular ratio where the sparking is maximized. >Mills uses a pinhole technique for finding UV where he actually drills a >sub-mm hole into the reactor wall with line of sight to the plasma, and mounts >and glues a photocell UV detector chip over the hole - but that is for a >vacuum reactor. >Robin may have experience with this...? sorry..no. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk
