Re: [vos-d] Van Jacobson: "named data"
oh, before I get stoned to death by the FUD patrol :-D I'm not claiming we already do *exactly* what he wants. I am, rather, interested in how *related* what he wants is to the VOS model; in the sense that if it is, then it might be easy for us to add a few interesting features based on his ideas. best, Lalo Martins -- So many of our dreams at first seem impossible, then they seem improbable, and then, when we summon the will, they soon become inevitable. - personal:http://lalo.hystericalraisins.net/ technical:http://www.hystericalraisins.net/ GNU: never give up freedom http://www.gnu.org/ ___ vos-d mailing list vos-d@interreality.org http://www.interreality.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vos-d
[vos-d] Van Jacobson: "named data"
Aaron Bentley posted to the bzr list about a Van Jacobson talk:
> I was watching this talk by Van Jacobson about a new networking
> paradigm, and I started going "hey, I know this stuff".
>
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6972678839686672840&hl=en
>
> Around 37:31, he starts talking about a new dissemination mechanism in
> which you look for named data, rather than having conversations with
> servers.
I can't actually *watch* the talk, though, as stupid google video doesn't
work in China. If anyone is interested, can you please watch, and post a
summary? In particular, how much it's relevant to the way we're already
doing things ("named data" sounds a lot like "vobject" from my chair).
best,
Lalo Martins
--
So many of our dreams at first seem impossible,
then they seem improbable, and then, when we
summon the will, they soon become inevitable.
-
personal:http://lalo.hystericalraisins.net/
technical:http://www.hystericalraisins.net/
GNU: never give up freedom http://www.gnu.org/
___
vos-d mailing list
vos-d@interreality.org
http://www.interreality.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vos-d
Re: [vos-d] Movement interpolation update
Karsten Otto wrote: > You cannot really fix this with a "don't-interpolate" flag, > as there is no good place to put one. You could extend the property- > update notification, but a lot of properties do not use interpolation That's ok. Nothing stops you from adding whatever fields you want to the message, and for Terangreal to check for the field for the position property. This is why fields have names. Pete's idea of having extensible method types is interesting though, might be useful. Reed ___ vos-d mailing list vos-d@interreality.org http://www.interreality.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vos-d
