date:20170625

Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE

2017-06-25 Thread Ni, Hongjun

Currently, it will not.

From: yug...@telincn.com [mailto:yug...@telincn.com]
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 10:52 AM
To: Ni, Hongjun ; Vincent Jardin 

Cc: vpp-dev 
Subject: Re: RE: [vpp-dev] PPPOE

Is this framework will be applied to IPoE?

Regards,
Ewan

yug...@telincn.com

From: Ni, Hongjun
Date: 2017-06-26 10:39
To: Ni, Hongjun; 
yug...@telincn.com; Vincent 
Jardin
CC: vpp-dev
Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] PPPOE
To make it clear:

The PPPoE plugin will contains fast path graph node and slow path graph node.

The fast path graph node is for the data plane only and handle PPPoE session 
lookup, PPPoE decap and PPPoE encap.

The slow path graph node will leverage existing control plane applications to 
handle the slow path traffics in the PPPoE discovery stage.

Regards,
Hongjun

From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io 
[mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Ni, Hongjun
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 10:23 AM
To: yug...@telincn.com; Vincent Jardin 
>
Cc: vpp-dev >
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE

Hi guys,

We are developing PPPoE feature as a VPP plugin now, which plans to be 
upstreamed to VPP 17.10 release.

Just let community know about this to avoid duplicate effort.

Thanks,
Hongjun

From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io 
[mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of 
yug...@telincn.com
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 10:16 AM
To: Vincent Jardin >
Cc: vpp-dev >
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE

Hi，
Linux's PPPoE is very slow on creating new session, i will figure that out.

Thanks,
Ewan

yug...@telincn.com

From: Vincent Jardin
Date: 2017-06-17 04:29
To: yug...@telincn.com
CC: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE
FYI, 6WIND  provides a full PPP stack (L2TP, PPPoE) server and clients. It
tooks years to develop it and unfortunately it has dependencies that
prevent using it with VPP. But it works fine with DPDK. It is available
both under source code or binary only but under specific licensing.

But usually, most people are fine with Linux PPP, since most connections
are slow (under 20Mbps), so why not using Linux?

Le 16 juin 2017 7:53:44 PM Ole Troan 
> a écrit :

>> Is there any plan to surpport pppoe?
>
> Not as far as I know.
> Feel free to start a PPP project. You would need to implement some NCPs too.
>
> Cheers,
> Ole
>
>
>
> --
> ___
> vpp-dev mailing list
> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE

2017-06-25 Thread Ni, Hongjun

Hi Ed,

PPPoE plugin will support any kind of control plan projects.

Currently, we plan to test slow path code using below open source control plan 
project:
https://github.com/wfnex/openbras

We will create a tap port hooked to the kernel -> OpenBRAS
The slow path graph node will forward all non PPPoE session stage traffic to 
control plane via TAP port.

-Hongjun

From: Ed Warnicke [mailto:hagb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 10:41 AM
To: Ni, Hongjun 
Cc: yug...@telincn.com; Vincent Jardin ; vpp-dev 

Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE

Hongjun,

That sounds good :)  Could you say more about your thoughts on control plane?

Ed

On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Ni, Hongjun 
> wrote:
To make it clear:

The PPPoE plugin will contains fast path graph node and slow path graph node.

The fast path graph node is for the data plane only and handle PPPoE session 
lookup, PPPoE decap and PPPoE encap.

The slow path graph node will leverage existing control plane applications to 
handle the slow path traffics in the PPPoE discovery stage.

Regards,
Hongjun

From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io 
[mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On 
Behalf Of Ni, Hongjun
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 10:23 AM
To: yug...@telincn.com; Vincent Jardin 
>

Cc: vpp-dev >
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE

Hi guys,

We are developing PPPoE feature as a VPP plugin now, which plans to be 
upstreamed to VPP 17.10 release.

Just let community know about this to avoid duplicate effort.

Thanks,
Hongjun

From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io 
[mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of 
yug...@telincn.com
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 10:16 AM
To: Vincent Jardin >
Cc: vpp-dev >
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE

Hi，
Linux's PPPoE is very slow on creating new session, i will figure that out.

Thanks,
Ewan

yug...@telincn.com

From: Vincent Jardin
Date: 2017-06-17 04:29
To: yug...@telincn.com
CC: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE
FYI, 6WIND  provides a full PPP stack (L2TP, PPPoE) server and clients. It
tooks years to develop it and unfortunately it has dependencies that
prevent using it with VPP. But it works fine with DPDK. It is available
both under source code or binary only but under specific licensing.

But usually, most people are fine with Linux PPP, since most connections
are slow (under 20Mbps), so why not using Linux?

Le 16 juin 2017 7:53:44 PM Ole Troan 
> a écrit :

>> Is there any plan to surpport pppoe?
>
> Not as far as I know.
> Feel free to start a PPP project. You would need to implement some NCPs too.
>
> Cheers,
> Ole
>
>
>
> --
> ___
> vpp-dev mailing list
> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE

2017-06-25 Thread yug...@telincn.com

Is this framework will be applied to IPoE?

Regards,
Ewan



yug...@telincn.com
 
From: Ni, Hongjun
Date: 2017-06-26 10:39
To: Ni, Hongjun; yug...@telincn.com; Vincent Jardin
CC: vpp-dev
Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] PPPOE
To make it clear:
 
The PPPoE plugin will contains fast path graph node and slow path graph node.
 
The fast path graph node is for the data plane only and handle PPPoE session 
lookup, PPPoE decap and PPPoE encap.
 
The slow path graph node will leverage existing control plane applications to 
handle the slow path traffics in the PPPoE discovery stage.
 
Regards,
Hongjun
 
From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On 
Behalf Of Ni, Hongjun
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 10:23 AM
To: yug...@telincn.com; Vincent Jardin 
Cc: vpp-dev 
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE
 
Hi guys,
 
We are developing PPPoE feature as a VPP plugin now, which plans to be 
upstreamed to VPP 17.10 release.
 
Just let community know about this to avoid duplicate effort.
 
Thanks,
Hongjun
 
From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On 
Behalf Of yug...@telincn.com
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 10:16 AM
To: Vincent Jardin 
Cc: vpp-dev 
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE
 
Hi，
Linux's PPPoE is very slow on creating new session, i will figure that out.
 
Thanks,
Ewan 
 


yug...@telincn.com
 
From: Vincent Jardin
Date: 2017-06-17 04:29
To: yug...@telincn.com
CC: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE
FYI, 6WIND  provides a full PPP stack (L2TP, PPPoE) server and clients. It 
tooks years to develop it and unfortunately it has dependencies that 
prevent using it with VPP. But it works fine with DPDK. It is available 
both under source code or binary only but under specific licensing.
 
But usually, most people are fine with Linux PPP, since most connections 
are slow (under 20Mbps), so why not using Linux?
 
 
Le 16 juin 2017 7:53:44 PM Ole Troan  a écrit :
 
>> Is there any plan to surpport pppoe?
> 
> Not as far as I know.
> Feel free to start a PPP project. You would need to implement some NCPs too.
> 
> Cheers,
> Ole
> 
> 
> 
> --
> ___
> vpp-dev mailing list
> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
 
 
 
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE

2017-06-25 Thread Ed Warnicke

Hongjun,

That sounds good :)  Could you say more about your thoughts on control
plane?

Ed

On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Ni, Hongjun  wrote:

> To make it clear:
>
>
>
> The PPPoE plugin will contains fast path graph node and slow path graph
> node.
>
>
>
> The fast path graph node is for the data plane only and handle PPPoE
> session lookup, PPPoE decap and PPPoE encap.
>
>
>
> The slow path graph node will leverage existing control plane applications
> to handle the slow path traffics in the PPPoE discovery stage.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Hongjun
>
>
>
> *From:* vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] *On
> Behalf Of *Ni, Hongjun
> *Sent:* Monday, June 26, 2017 10:23 AM
> *To:* yug...@telincn.com; Vincent Jardin 
>
> *Cc:* vpp-dev 
> *Subject:* Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE
>
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
>
>
> We are developing PPPoE feature as a VPP plugin now, which plans to be
> upstreamed to VPP 17.10 release.
>
>
>
> Just let community know about this to avoid duplicate effort.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Hongjun
>
>
>
> *From:* vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io
> ] *On Behalf Of *yug...@telincn.com
> *Sent:* Saturday, June 17, 2017 10:16 AM
> *To:* Vincent Jardin 
> *Cc:* vpp-dev 
> *Subject:* Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE
>
>
>
> Hi，
>
> Linux's PPPoE is very slow on creating new session, i will figure that out.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ewan
>
>
> --
>
> yug...@telincn.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Vincent Jardin 
>
> *Date:* 2017-06-17 04:29
>
> *To:* yug...@telincn.com
>
> *CC:* vpp-dev 
>
> *Subject:* Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE
>
> FYI, 6WIND  provides a full PPP stack (L2TP, PPPoE) server and clients. It
>
> tooks years to develop it and unfortunately it has dependencies that
>
> prevent using it with VPP. But it works fine with DPDK. It is available
>
> both under source code or binary only but under specific licensing.
>
>
>
> But usually, most people are fine with Linux PPP, since most connections
>
> are slow (under 20Mbps), so why not using Linux?
>
>
>
>
>
> Le 16 juin 2017 7:53:44 PM Ole Troan  a écrit :
>
>
>
> >> Is there any plan to surpport pppoe?
>
> >
>
> > Not as far as I know.
>
> > Feel free to start a PPP project. You would need to implement some NCPs
> too.
>
> >
>
> > Cheers,
>
> > Ole
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > --
>
> > ___
>
> > vpp-dev mailing list
>
> > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
>
> > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> vpp-dev mailing list
> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
>
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE

2017-06-25 Thread Ni, Hongjun

To make it clear:

The PPPoE plugin will contains fast path graph node and slow path graph node.

The fast path graph node is for the data plane only and handle PPPoE session 
lookup, PPPoE decap and PPPoE encap.

The slow path graph node will leverage existing control plane applications to 
handle the slow path traffics in the PPPoE discovery stage.

Regards,
Hongjun

From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On 
Behalf Of Ni, Hongjun
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 10:23 AM
To: yug...@telincn.com; Vincent Jardin 
Cc: vpp-dev 
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE

Hi guys,

We are developing PPPoE feature as a VPP plugin now, which plans to be 
upstreamed to VPP 17.10 release.

Just let community know about this to avoid duplicate effort.

Thanks,
Hongjun

From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io 
[mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of 
yug...@telincn.com
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 10:16 AM
To: Vincent Jardin >
Cc: vpp-dev >
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE

Hi，
Linux's PPPoE is very slow on creating new session, i will figure that out.

Thanks,
Ewan


yug...@telincn.com

From: Vincent Jardin
Date: 2017-06-17 04:29
To: yug...@telincn.com
CC: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE
FYI, 6WIND  provides a full PPP stack (L2TP, PPPoE) server and clients. It
tooks years to develop it and unfortunately it has dependencies that
prevent using it with VPP. But it works fine with DPDK. It is available
both under source code or binary only but under specific licensing.

But usually, most people are fine with Linux PPP, since most connections
are slow (under 20Mbps), so why not using Linux?


Le 16 juin 2017 7:53:44 PM Ole Troan 
> a écrit :

>> Is there any plan to surpport pppoe?
>
> Not as far as I know.
> Feel free to start a PPP project. You would need to implement some NCPs too.
>
> Cheers,
> Ole
>
>
>
> --
> ___
> vpp-dev mailing list
> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev



___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE

2017-06-25 Thread Ni, Hongjun

Hi guys,

We are developing PPPoE feature as a VPP plugin now, which plans to be 
upstreamed to VPP 17.10 release.

Just let community know about this to avoid duplicate effort.

Thanks,
Hongjun

From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On 
Behalf Of yug...@telincn.com
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 10:16 AM
To: Vincent Jardin 
Cc: vpp-dev 
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE

Hi，
Linux's PPPoE is very slow on creating new session, i will figure that out.

Thanks,
Ewan


yug...@telincn.com

From: Vincent Jardin
Date: 2017-06-17 04:29
To: yug...@telincn.com
CC: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE
FYI, 6WIND  provides a full PPP stack (L2TP, PPPoE) server and clients. It
tooks years to develop it and unfortunately it has dependencies that
prevent using it with VPP. But it works fine with DPDK. It is available
both under source code or binary only but under specific licensing.

But usually, most people are fine with Linux PPP, since most connections
are slow (under 20Mbps), so why not using Linux?


Le 16 juin 2017 7:53:44 PM Ole Troan 
> a écrit :

>> Is there any plan to surpport pppoe?
>
> Not as far as I know.
> Feel free to start a PPP project. You would need to implement some NCPs too.
>
> Cheers,
> Ole
>
>
>
> --
> ___
> vpp-dev mailing list
> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev



___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] Nexus server seems to be down: https://nexus.fd.io

2017-06-25 Thread Thomas F Herbert


It is back up now.


On 06/25/2017 02:36 PM, Ed Warnicke wrote:
What symptoms are you seeing... my normal spot checks show it up, but 
it may be down more subtly than they would detect.

http was hanging. It lasted an hour or more.


Ed

On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Thomas F Herbert > wrote:


The nexus server seems to be down for about 40 minutes now.

Has anyone else noticed this?

--TFH


-- 
*Thomas F Herbert*

Fast Data Planes
Office of Technology
*Red Hat*

___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io 
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev





--
*Thomas F Herbert*
Fast Data Planes
Office of Technology
*Red Hat*
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE

Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE

Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE

Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE

Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE

Re: [vpp-dev] PPPOE

Re: [vpp-dev] Nexus server seems to be down: https://nexus.fd.io

7 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information