Re: [vpp-dev] About nat44 translation with multi-tenancy

[Kyosuke Hori]

Hello,

Thanks Filip, I understand that vrf 0 means all vrf.

If I want to do nat 44 translation in multitenancy without specifying ports, 
should I enable nat 44 with the following command?
```
vpp# nat44 enable inside-vrf 0 outside-vrf 0
```

Also, if possible, could you share some limitations?

Best regards,

Kyosuke Hori

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#20485): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20485
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/86964010/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] FD.io CSIT-2110 Release Report is published

[Ameen Al-Azzawi]

Dear Maciek,

I didn't mean to be rude, but you know how it feels when you see a
community of professionals for specific software and no one could help.
I know that no one is obliged to help me, I was simply expecting more out
of it.

Regards
Ameen

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 4:39 PM Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) <
mkons...@cisco.com> wrote:

> Dear Ameen,
>
> What specific statement in the email do you disagree with?
>
> This is not a research paper, it is FD.io CSIT release report capturing
> benchmarking and functional test data for v21.10 release.
>
> Regarding your comment about "VPP and the system doesn't function”, I
> checked your statement about:
>
> "I have asked here a million times about configuring ds-lite, no one
> helped.”
>
> And found out that you have sent few emails (between 26-Sep and 28-Oct) to
> vpp-dev with questions about running ds-lite on vpp, and the last email was
> not answered.
> I suggest you resend the email, and I am confident that FD.io dev
> community will provide you with support.
>
> Cheers,
> Maciek
>
>
> On 11 Nov 2021, at 14:22, Ameen Al-Azzawi  wrote:
>
> I would totally disagree.
> It is disappointing when you base your research paper on VPP and the
> system doesn't function.
> I have asked here a million times about configuring ds-lite, no one
> helped.
>
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 3:19 PM Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) via
> lists.fd.io  wrote:
>
>> Big thanks to FD.io  community contributors and
>> supporters that enabled this data-rich publication.
>> Great job everyone!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Maciek
>>
>> On 10 Nov 2021, at 18:12, Tibor Frank via lists.fd.io <
>> tifrank=cisco@lists.fd.io> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> FD.io  CSIT-2110 report is now available on FD.io
>>  docs site:
>>
>> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/
>>
>> Another successful release! Many thanks to all contributors in CSIT and
>> VPP communities for making it happen.
>>
>> See below for CSIT-2110 release summary and pointers to specific
>> sections in the report.
>>
>> Welcome all comments, best by email to csit-...@lists.fd.io.
>>
>> Tibor
>>
>>
>> CSIT-2110 Release Summary
>> -
>>
>> BENCHMARK TESTS
>>
>> - Intel Xeon Ice Lake: Added test data for these platforms. Current
>> CSIT-2110
>>   report data for Intel Xeon Ice Lake comes from an external source (Intel
>>   labs running CSIT code on “8360Y D Stepping” and “6338N” processors).
>>
>> - MLRsearch improvements: Added support for multiple packet throughput
>> rates
>>   in a single search, each rate is associated with a distinct Packet Loss
>> Ratio
>>   (PLR) criterion. Previously only Non Drop Rate (NDR) (PLR=0) and single
>>   Partial Drop Rate (PDR) (PLR<0.5%) were supported. Implemented number of
>>   optimizations improving rate discovery efficiency.
>>
>> - TREX performance tests: Added initial tests for testing latency between
>> 2
>>   ports on nic on the TRex. Added tests: IP4Base, IP4scale2m, IP6Base,
>>   IP6scale2m, L2bscale1mmaclrn.
>>
>> TEST FRAMEWORK
>>
>> - CSIT test environment version has been updated to ver. 8: Intel NIC
>> 700/800
>>   series firmware upgrade based on DPDK compatibility matrix.
>>
>> - CSIT in AWS environment: Added CSIT support for AWS c5n instances
>>   environment.
>>
>> Pointers to CSIT-2110 Report sections
>> -
>>
>> 1. FD.io  CSIT test methodology  [1]
>> 2. VPP release notes[2]
>> 3. VPP 64B/IMIX throughput graphs   [3]
>> 4. VPP throughput speedup multi-core[4]
>> 5. VPP latency under load   [5]
>> 6. VPP comparisons v21.10 vs. v21.06[6]
>> 7. VPP performance all pkt sizes & NICs [7]
>> 8. DPDK 21.08 apps release notes[8]
>> 9. DPDK 64B throughput graphs   [9]
>> 10. DPDK latency under load [10]
>> 11. DPDK comparisons 21.08 vs. 21.02[11]
>> 12. TRex 2.88 apps release notes[12]
>> 13. TRex 64B throughput graphs  [13]
>> 14. TRex latency under load [14]
>>
>> Functional device tests (VPP_Device) are also included in the report.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/introduction/methodology.html
>> [2]
>> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html
>> [3]
>> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/index.html
>> [4]
>> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/throughput_speedup_multi_core/index.html
>> [5]
>> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_latency/index.html
>> [6]
>> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/comparisons/current_vs_previous_release.html
>> [7]
>> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/detailed_test_results/vpp_performance_results/index.html
>> [8]
>> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/dpdk_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html
>> 

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] FD.io CSIT-2110 Release Report is published

[Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) via lists.fd.io]

Dear Ameen,

What specific statement in the email do you disagree with?

This is not a research paper, it is FD.io CSIT release report 
capturing benchmarking and functional test data for v21.10 release.

Regarding your comment about "VPP and the system doesn't function”, I checked 
your statement about:

"I have asked here a million times about configuring ds-lite, no one helped.”

And found out that you have sent few emails (between 26-Sep and 28-Oct) to 
vpp-dev with questions about running ds-lite on vpp, and the last email was not 
answered.
I suggest you resend the email, and I am confident that FD.io dev 
community will provide you with support.

Cheers,
Maciek


On 11 Nov 2021, at 14:22, Ameen Al-Azzawi 
mailto:ameen.azz...@gmail.com>> wrote:

I would totally disagree.
It is disappointing when you base your research paper on VPP and the system 
doesn't function.
I have asked here a million times about configuring ds-lite, no one helped.

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 3:19 PM Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) via 
lists.fd.io 
mailto:cisco@lists.fd.io>> wrote:
Big thanks to FD.io community contributors and supporters that 
enabled this data-rich publication.
Great job everyone!

Cheers,
Maciek

On 10 Nov 2021, at 18:12, Tibor Frank via lists.fd.io 
mailto:tifrank=cisco@lists.fd.io>> wrote:

Hi All,

FD.io CSIT-2110 report is now available on FD.io 
docs site:

https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/

Another successful release! Many thanks to all contributors in CSIT and
VPP communities for making it happen.

See below for CSIT-2110 release summary and pointers to specific
sections in the report.

Welcome all comments, best by email to 
csit-...@lists.fd.io.

Tibor


CSIT-2110 Release Summary
-

BENCHMARK TESTS

- Intel Xeon Ice Lake: Added test data for these platforms. Current CSIT-2110
  report data for Intel Xeon Ice Lake comes from an external source (Intel
  labs running CSIT code on “8360Y D Stepping” and “6338N” processors).

- MLRsearch improvements: Added support for multiple packet throughput rates
  in a single search, each rate is associated with a distinct Packet Loss Ratio
  (PLR) criterion. Previously only Non Drop Rate (NDR) (PLR=0) and single
  Partial Drop Rate (PDR) (PLR<0.5%) were supported. Implemented number of
  optimizations improving rate discovery efficiency.

- TREX performance tests: Added initial tests for testing latency between 2
  ports on nic on the TRex. Added tests: IP4Base, IP4scale2m, IP6Base,
  IP6scale2m, L2bscale1mmaclrn.

TEST FRAMEWORK

- CSIT test environment version has been updated to ver. 8: Intel NIC 700/800
  series firmware upgrade based on DPDK compatibility matrix.

- CSIT in AWS environment: Added CSIT support for AWS c5n instances
  environment.

Pointers to CSIT-2110 Report sections
-

1. FD.io CSIT test methodology  [1]
2. VPP release notes[2]
3. VPP 64B/IMIX throughput graphs   [3]
4. VPP throughput speedup multi-core[4]
5. VPP latency under load   [5]
6. VPP comparisons v21.10 vs. v21.06[6]
7. VPP performance all pkt sizes & NICs [7]
8. DPDK 21.08 apps release notes[8]
9. DPDK 64B throughput graphs   [9]
10. DPDK latency under load [10]
11. DPDK comparisons 21.08 vs. 21.02[11]
12. TRex 2.88 apps release notes[12]
13. TRex 64B throughput graphs  [13]
14. TRex latency under load [14]

Functional device tests (VPP_Device) are also included in the report.

[1] https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/introduction/methodology.html
[2] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html
[3] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/index.html
[4] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/throughput_speedup_multi_core/index.html
[5] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_latency/index.html
[6] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/comparisons/current_vs_previous_release.html
[7] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/detailed_test_results/vpp_performance_results/index.html
[8] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/dpdk_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html
[9] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/dpdk_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/index.html
[10] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/dpdk_performance_tests/packet_latency/index.html
[11] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/dpdk_performance_tests/comparisons/current_vs_previous_release.html
[12] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/trex_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html
[13] 

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] FD.io CSIT-2110 Release Report is published

[Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) via lists.fd.io]

Hi Stanislav,

You are welcome.

Thanks for spotting, and you are right, the af_xdp driver numbers did a nose 
dive indeed.
It’s visible on xeon skylake per your link references, and also on:
- intel xeon cascadelake [2], [3],
- arm thunderx2 [4].

Comparison tables [5], [6] provide a proof that the drop is due to CSIT test 
environment change from v7 to v8 [7], and unlikely due to VPP code.
We need to investigate.

Hope this makes sense.

Cheers,
Maciek

[2] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/ip4-2n-clx-xxv710.html#b-2t1c-ip4routing-base-scale-af-xdp
[3] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2106/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/ip4-2n-clx-xxv710.html#b-2t1c-ip4routing-base-scale-af-xdp
[4] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/ip4-2n-tx2-xl710.html#b-1t1c-ip4routing-base-scale-af-xdp
[5] search for “af-xdp” in 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/_static/vpp/performance-changes-2n-skx-2t1c-pdr.txt
[6] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/comparisons/current_vs_previous_release.html
[7] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/test_environment.html#environment-versioning

On 11 Nov 2021, at 14:47, Stanislav Zaikin 
mailto:zsta...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Thanks for the report!
Out of curiosity, what happened to AF_XDP? PPS rate was much bigger on r21.06.

[0] - 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/ip4-2n-skx-x710.html
[1] - 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2106/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/ip4-2n-skx-x710.html

On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 at 15:19, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) via 
lists.fd.io 
mailto:cisco@lists.fd.io>> wrote:
Big thanks to FD.io community contributors and supporters that 
enabled this data-rich publication.
Great job everyone!

Cheers,
Maciek

On 10 Nov 2021, at 18:12, Tibor Frank via lists.fd.io 
mailto:tifrank=cisco@lists.fd.io>> wrote:

Hi All,

FD.io CSIT-2110 report is now available on FD.io 
docs site:

https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/

Another successful release! Many thanks to all contributors in CSIT and
VPP communities for making it happen.

See below for CSIT-2110 release summary and pointers to specific
sections in the report.

Welcome all comments, best by email to 
csit-...@lists.fd.io.

Tibor


CSIT-2110 Release Summary
-

BENCHMARK TESTS

- Intel Xeon Ice Lake: Added test data for these platforms. Current CSIT-2110
  report data for Intel Xeon Ice Lake comes from an external source (Intel
  labs running CSIT code on “8360Y D Stepping” and “6338N” processors).

- MLRsearch improvements: Added support for multiple packet throughput rates
  in a single search, each rate is associated with a distinct Packet Loss Ratio
  (PLR) criterion. Previously only Non Drop Rate (NDR) (PLR=0) and single
  Partial Drop Rate (PDR) (PLR<0.5%) were supported. Implemented number of
  optimizations improving rate discovery efficiency.

- TREX performance tests: Added initial tests for testing latency between 2
  ports on nic on the TRex. Added tests: IP4Base, IP4scale2m, IP6Base,
  IP6scale2m, L2bscale1mmaclrn.

TEST FRAMEWORK

- CSIT test environment version has been updated to ver. 8: Intel NIC 700/800
  series firmware upgrade based on DPDK compatibility matrix.

- CSIT in AWS environment: Added CSIT support for AWS c5n instances
  environment.

Pointers to CSIT-2110 Report sections
-

1. FD.io CSIT test methodology  [1]
2. VPP release notes[2]
3. VPP 64B/IMIX throughput graphs   [3]
4. VPP throughput speedup multi-core[4]
5. VPP latency under load   [5]
6. VPP comparisons v21.10 vs. v21.06[6]
7. VPP performance all pkt sizes & NICs [7]
8. DPDK 21.08 apps release notes[8]
9. DPDK 64B throughput graphs   [9]
10. DPDK latency under load [10]
11. DPDK comparisons 21.08 vs. 21.02[11]
12. TRex 2.88 apps release notes[12]
13. TRex 64B throughput graphs  [13]
14. TRex latency under load [14]

Functional device tests (VPP_Device) are also included in the report.

[1] https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/introduction/methodology.html
[2] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html
[3] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/index.html
[4] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/throughput_speedup_multi_core/index.html
[5] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_latency/index.html
[6] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/comparisons/current_vs_previous_release.html

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] FD.io CSIT-2110 Release Report is published

[Stanislav Zaikin]

Thanks for the report!
Out of curiosity, what happened to AF_XDP? PPS rate was much bigger on
r21.06.

[0] -
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/ip4-2n-skx-x710.html
[1] -
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2106/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/ip4-2n-skx-x710.html

On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 at 15:19, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) via
lists.fd.io  wrote:

> Big thanks to FD.io community contributors and supporters that enabled
> this data-rich publication.
> Great job everyone!
>
> Cheers,
> Maciek
>
> On 10 Nov 2021, at 18:12, Tibor Frank via lists.fd.io <
> tifrank=cisco@lists.fd.io> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> FD.io  CSIT-2110 report is now available on FD.io
>  docs site:
>
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/
>
> Another successful release! Many thanks to all contributors in CSIT and
> VPP communities for making it happen.
>
> See below for CSIT-2110 release summary and pointers to specific
> sections in the report.
>
> Welcome all comments, best by email to csit-...@lists.fd.io.
>
> Tibor
>
>
> CSIT-2110 Release Summary
> -
>
> BENCHMARK TESTS
>
> - Intel Xeon Ice Lake: Added test data for these platforms. Current
> CSIT-2110
>   report data for Intel Xeon Ice Lake comes from an external source (Intel
>   labs running CSIT code on “8360Y D Stepping” and “6338N” processors).
>
> - MLRsearch improvements: Added support for multiple packet throughput
> rates
>   in a single search, each rate is associated with a distinct Packet Loss
> Ratio
>   (PLR) criterion. Previously only Non Drop Rate (NDR) (PLR=0) and single
>   Partial Drop Rate (PDR) (PLR<0.5%) were supported. Implemented number of
>   optimizations improving rate discovery efficiency.
>
> - TREX performance tests: Added initial tests for testing latency between 2
>   ports on nic on the TRex. Added tests: IP4Base, IP4scale2m, IP6Base,
>   IP6scale2m, L2bscale1mmaclrn.
>
> TEST FRAMEWORK
>
> - CSIT test environment version has been updated to ver. 8: Intel NIC
> 700/800
>   series firmware upgrade based on DPDK compatibility matrix.
>
> - CSIT in AWS environment: Added CSIT support for AWS c5n instances
>   environment.
>
> Pointers to CSIT-2110 Report sections
> -
>
> 1. FD.io  CSIT test methodology  [1]
> 2. VPP release notes[2]
> 3. VPP 64B/IMIX throughput graphs   [3]
> 4. VPP throughput speedup multi-core[4]
> 5. VPP latency under load   [5]
> 6. VPP comparisons v21.10 vs. v21.06[6]
> 7. VPP performance all pkt sizes & NICs [7]
> 8. DPDK 21.08 apps release notes[8]
> 9. DPDK 64B throughput graphs   [9]
> 10. DPDK latency under load [10]
> 11. DPDK comparisons 21.08 vs. 21.02[11]
> 12. TRex 2.88 apps release notes[12]
> 13. TRex 64B throughput graphs  [13]
> 14. TRex latency under load [14]
>
> Functional device tests (VPP_Device) are also included in the report.
>
> [1]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/introduction/methodology.html
> [2]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html
> [3]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/index.html
> [4]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/throughput_speedup_multi_core/index.html
> [5]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_latency/index.html
> [6]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/comparisons/current_vs_previous_release.html
> [7]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/detailed_test_results/vpp_performance_results/index.html
> [8]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/dpdk_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html
> [9]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/dpdk_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/index.html
> [10]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/dpdk_performance_tests/packet_latency/index.html
> [11]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/dpdk_performance_tests/comparisons/current_vs_previous_release.html
> [12]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/trex_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html
> [13]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/trex_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/index.html
> [14]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/trex_performance_tests/packet_latency/index.html
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>

-- 
Best regards
Stanislav Zaikin

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#20481): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20481
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/86982560/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] FD.io CSIT-2110 Release Report is published

[Ameen Al-Azzawi]

I would totally disagree.
It is disappointing when you base your research paper on VPP and the system
doesn't function.
I have asked here a million times about configuring ds-lite, no one helped.

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 3:19 PM Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) via
lists.fd.io  wrote:

> Big thanks to FD.io community contributors and supporters that enabled
> this data-rich publication.
> Great job everyone!
>
> Cheers,
> Maciek
>
> On 10 Nov 2021, at 18:12, Tibor Frank via lists.fd.io <
> tifrank=cisco@lists.fd.io> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> FD.io  CSIT-2110 report is now available on FD.io
>  docs site:
>
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/
>
> Another successful release! Many thanks to all contributors in CSIT and
> VPP communities for making it happen.
>
> See below for CSIT-2110 release summary and pointers to specific
> sections in the report.
>
> Welcome all comments, best by email to csit-...@lists.fd.io.
>
> Tibor
>
>
> CSIT-2110 Release Summary
> -
>
> BENCHMARK TESTS
>
> - Intel Xeon Ice Lake: Added test data for these platforms. Current
> CSIT-2110
>   report data for Intel Xeon Ice Lake comes from an external source (Intel
>   labs running CSIT code on “8360Y D Stepping” and “6338N” processors).
>
> - MLRsearch improvements: Added support for multiple packet throughput
> rates
>   in a single search, each rate is associated with a distinct Packet Loss
> Ratio
>   (PLR) criterion. Previously only Non Drop Rate (NDR) (PLR=0) and single
>   Partial Drop Rate (PDR) (PLR<0.5%) were supported. Implemented number of
>   optimizations improving rate discovery efficiency.
>
> - TREX performance tests: Added initial tests for testing latency between 2
>   ports on nic on the TRex. Added tests: IP4Base, IP4scale2m, IP6Base,
>   IP6scale2m, L2bscale1mmaclrn.
>
> TEST FRAMEWORK
>
> - CSIT test environment version has been updated to ver. 8: Intel NIC
> 700/800
>   series firmware upgrade based on DPDK compatibility matrix.
>
> - CSIT in AWS environment: Added CSIT support for AWS c5n instances
>   environment.
>
> Pointers to CSIT-2110 Report sections
> -
>
> 1. FD.io  CSIT test methodology  [1]
> 2. VPP release notes[2]
> 3. VPP 64B/IMIX throughput graphs   [3]
> 4. VPP throughput speedup multi-core[4]
> 5. VPP latency under load   [5]
> 6. VPP comparisons v21.10 vs. v21.06[6]
> 7. VPP performance all pkt sizes & NICs [7]
> 8. DPDK 21.08 apps release notes[8]
> 9. DPDK 64B throughput graphs   [9]
> 10. DPDK latency under load [10]
> 11. DPDK comparisons 21.08 vs. 21.02[11]
> 12. TRex 2.88 apps release notes[12]
> 13. TRex 64B throughput graphs  [13]
> 14. TRex latency under load [14]
>
> Functional device tests (VPP_Device) are also included in the report.
>
> [1]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/introduction/methodology.html
> [2]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html
> [3]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/index.html
> [4]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/throughput_speedup_multi_core/index.html
> [5]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_latency/index.html
> [6]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/comparisons/current_vs_previous_release.html
> [7]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/detailed_test_results/vpp_performance_results/index.html
> [8]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/dpdk_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html
> [9]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/dpdk_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/index.html
> [10]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/dpdk_performance_tests/packet_latency/index.html
> [11]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/dpdk_performance_tests/comparisons/current_vs_previous_release.html
> [12]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/trex_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html
> [13]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/trex_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/index.html
> [14]
> https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/trex_performance_tests/packet_latency/index.html
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#20480): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20480
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/86982560/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] FD.io CSIT-2110 Release Report is published

[Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) via lists.fd.io]

Big thanks to FD.io community contributors and supporters that 
enabled this data-rich publication.
Great job everyone!

Cheers,
Maciek

On 10 Nov 2021, at 18:12, Tibor Frank via lists.fd.io 
mailto:tifrank=cisco@lists.fd.io>> wrote:

Hi All,

FD.io CSIT-2110 report is now available on FD.io 
docs site:

https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/

Another successful release! Many thanks to all contributors in CSIT and
VPP communities for making it happen.

See below for CSIT-2110 release summary and pointers to specific
sections in the report.

Welcome all comments, best by email to 
csit-...@lists.fd.io.

Tibor


CSIT-2110 Release Summary
-

BENCHMARK TESTS

- Intel Xeon Ice Lake: Added test data for these platforms. Current CSIT-2110
  report data for Intel Xeon Ice Lake comes from an external source (Intel
  labs running CSIT code on “8360Y D Stepping” and “6338N” processors).

- MLRsearch improvements: Added support for multiple packet throughput rates
  in a single search, each rate is associated with a distinct Packet Loss Ratio
  (PLR) criterion. Previously only Non Drop Rate (NDR) (PLR=0) and single
  Partial Drop Rate (PDR) (PLR<0.5%) were supported. Implemented number of
  optimizations improving rate discovery efficiency.

- TREX performance tests: Added initial tests for testing latency between 2
  ports on nic on the TRex. Added tests: IP4Base, IP4scale2m, IP6Base,
  IP6scale2m, L2bscale1mmaclrn.

TEST FRAMEWORK

- CSIT test environment version has been updated to ver. 8: Intel NIC 700/800
  series firmware upgrade based on DPDK compatibility matrix.

- CSIT in AWS environment: Added CSIT support for AWS c5n instances
  environment.

Pointers to CSIT-2110 Report sections
-

1. FD.io CSIT test methodology  [1]
2. VPP release notes[2]
3. VPP 64B/IMIX throughput graphs   [3]
4. VPP throughput speedup multi-core[4]
5. VPP latency under load   [5]
6. VPP comparisons v21.10 vs. v21.06[6]
7. VPP performance all pkt sizes & NICs [7]
8. DPDK 21.08 apps release notes[8]
9. DPDK 64B throughput graphs   [9]
10. DPDK latency under load [10]
11. DPDK comparisons 21.08 vs. 21.02[11]
12. TRex 2.88 apps release notes[12]
13. TRex 64B throughput graphs  [13]
14. TRex latency under load [14]

Functional device tests (VPP_Device) are also included in the report.

[1] https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/introduction/methodology.html
[2] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html
[3] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/index.html
[4] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/throughput_speedup_multi_core/index.html
[5] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_latency/index.html
[6] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/vpp_performance_tests/comparisons/current_vs_previous_release.html
[7] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/detailed_test_results/vpp_performance_results/index.html
[8] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/dpdk_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html
[9] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/dpdk_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/index.html
[10] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/dpdk_performance_tests/packet_latency/index.html
[11] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/dpdk_performance_tests/comparisons/current_vs_previous_release.html
[12] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/trex_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html
[13] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/trex_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/index.html
[14] 
https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2110/report/trex_performance_tests/packet_latency/index.html






-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#20479): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20479
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/86982560/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[vpp-dev] Understanding on CIR EIR CB EB of policer

[Akash S R]

hello,

I have a query on CIR EIR CB EB values. Can I get some proper info on
these. How to calculate CB/EB values for a rate of traffic say CIR = 100
KBPS, traffic speed = 80 KBPS, so all must fall under confirm bucket right ?
Also CB is only Committed Burst or Committed Burst Size (CBS) as per the
below link ? Please advise.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/maximum-burst-size


Thanks,
Akash

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#20478): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20478
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/86978343/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [vpp-dev] project call

[Christian Hopps]

"Damjan Marion via lists.fd.io"  writes:


Today on the project call, we were discussing about doing some changes on those 
calls.

Proposal from few of us who were attending is:

- we should make it less formal, stop doing readouts and focus on specific 
topics to discuss, if there is no topics to discuss we simply drop


By readouts do you mean status of various areas? I think the status reports are 
useful. I have 3 meetings scheduled in the time slot and so I haven't been able 
to attend for the most part; however being able to read minutes later is a way 
for me to not miss out on this useful information.


- we move to biweekly, same time, 2nd and 4th Tue each month


This sounds good to me. Perhaps with the frequency increase you'd like to cut 
down on the process (first point?) maybe just do readouts once a month then?


- to increase attendance we encourage people having something to discuss to 
announce that in advance on the mailing list



- we should preferably use this mailing list if we need to make any decisions


This makes sense, like IETF, you can use the meeting to raise/discuss issues 
and the list to make the decision on any questions that arise.

Thanks,
Chris.



What other people think?

Thanks,

—
Damjan









signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#20477): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20477
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/86936610/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-