Re: [vpp-dev] Published: FD.io CSIT-2005 Release Report

2020-07-16 Thread Jerome Tollet via lists.fd.io
Hi Maciek,
Very impressive report with some interesting performance boosts. Thanks!
Jerome

Le 14/07/2020 15:33, « vpp-dev@lists.fd.io au nom de Maciek Konstantynowicz 
(mkonstan) via lists.fd.io »  a écrit :

Hi All,

FD.io CSIT-2005 report has been published on FD.io docs site:

https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/

Many thanks to All in CSIT, VPP and wider FD.io community who
contributed and worked hard to make CSIT-2005 happen!

See below for pointers to specific sections in the report.

Welcome all comments, best by email to csit-...@lists.fd.io.

Cheers,
-Maciek


Points of Note in the CSIT-2005 Report

Indexed specific links listed at the bottom.

1. VPP release notes
   a. Changes in CSIT-2005: [1]
   b. Known issues: [2]

2. VPP performance - 64B/IMIX throughput graphs (selected NIC models):
   a. Graphs explained: [3]
   b. L2 Ethernet Switching:[4]
   c. IPv4 Routing: [5]
   d. IPv6 Routing: [6]
   e. SRv6 Routing: [7]
   f. IPv4 Tunnels: [8]
   g. KVM VMs vhost-user:   [9]
   h. LXC/DRC Container Memif: [10]
   e. IPsec IPv4 Routing:  [11]
   f. Virtual Topology System: [12]

3. VPP performance - multi-core and latency graphs:
   a. Speedup Multi-Core:  [13]
   b. Latency: [14]

4. VPP performance comparisons
   a. VPP-20.05 vs. VPP-20.01:  [15]

5. VPP performance test details - all NICs:
   a. Detailed results 64B IMIX 1518B 9kB:  [16]
   b. Configuration:[17]

DPDK Testpmd and L3fwd performance sections follow similar structure.

6. DPDK applications:
  a. Release notes:   [18]
  b. DPDK performance - 64B throughput graphs:[19]
  c. DPDK performance - latency graphs:   [20]
  d. DPDK performance - DPDK-20.02 vs. DPDK-19.08: [21]

Functional device tests (VPP_Device) are also included in the report.

Specific links within the report:

 [1] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html#changes-in-csit-release
 [2] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html#known-issues
 [3] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/index.html
 [4] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/l2.html
 [5] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/ip4.html
 [6] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/ip6.html
 [7] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/srv6.html
 [8] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/ip4_tunnels.html
 [9] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/vm_vhost.html
[10] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/container_memif.html
[11] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/ipsec.html
[12] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/vts.html
[13] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/throughput_speedup_multi_core/index.html
[14] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_latency/index.html
[15] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/comparisons/current_vs_previous_release.html
[16] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/detailed_test_results/vpp_performance_results/index.html
[17] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/test_configuration/vpp_performance_configuration/index.html
[18] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/dpdk_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html
[19] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/dpdk_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/index.html
[20] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/dpdk_performance_tests/packet_latency/index.html
[21] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/dpdk_performance_tests/comparisons/current_vs_previous_release.html



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#16980): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/16980
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/75498644/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Re: [vpp-dev] Published: FD.io CSIT-2005 Release Report

2020-07-14 Thread Andrew Yourtchenko
Congrats! That was an excellent job done !

--a

> On 14 Jul 2020, at 15:33, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) via lists.fd.io 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> FD.io CSIT-2005 report has been published on FD.io docs site:
> 
>https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/
> 
> Many thanks to All in CSIT, VPP and wider FD.io community who
> contributed and worked hard to make CSIT-2005 happen!
> 
> See below for pointers to specific sections in the report.
> 
> Welcome all comments, best by email to csit-...@lists.fd.io.
> 
> Cheers,
> -Maciek
> 
> 
> Points of Note in the CSIT-2005 Report
> 
> Indexed specific links listed at the bottom.
> 
> 1. VPP release notes
>   a. Changes in CSIT-2005: [1]
>   b. Known issues: [2]
> 
> 2. VPP performance - 64B/IMIX throughput graphs (selected NIC models):
>   a. Graphs explained: [3]
>   b. L2 Ethernet Switching:[4]
>   c. IPv4 Routing: [5]
>   d. IPv6 Routing: [6]
>   e. SRv6 Routing: [7]
>   f. IPv4 Tunnels: [8]
>   g. KVM VMs vhost-user:   [9]
>   h. LXC/DRC Container Memif: [10]
>   e. IPsec IPv4 Routing:  [11]
>   f. Virtual Topology System: [12]
> 
> 3. VPP performance - multi-core and latency graphs:
>   a. Speedup Multi-Core:  [13]
>   b. Latency: [14]
> 
> 4. VPP performance comparisons
>   a. VPP-20.05 vs. VPP-20.01:  [15]
> 
> 5. VPP performance test details - all NICs:
>   a. Detailed results 64B IMIX 1518B 9kB:  [16]
>   b. Configuration:[17]
> 
> DPDK Testpmd and L3fwd performance sections follow similar structure.
> 
> 6. DPDK applications:
>  a. Release notes:   [18]
>  b. DPDK performance - 64B throughput graphs:[19]
>  c. DPDK performance - latency graphs:   [20]
>  d. DPDK performance - DPDK-20.02 vs. DPDK-19.08: [21]
> 
> Functional device tests (VPP_Device) are also included in the report.
> 
> Specific links within the report:
> 
> [1] 
> https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html#changes-in-csit-release
> [2] 
> https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html#known-issues
> [3] 
> https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/index.html
> [4] 
> https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/l2.html
> [5] 
> https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/ip4.html
> [6] 
> https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/ip6.html
> [7] 
> https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/srv6.html
> [8] 
> https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/ip4_tunnels.html
> [9] 
> https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/vm_vhost.html
> [10] 
> https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/container_memif.html
> [11] 
> https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/ipsec.html
> [12] 
> https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/vts.html
> [13] 
> https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/throughput_speedup_multi_core/index.html
> [14] 
> https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_latency/index.html
> [15] 
> https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/comparisons/current_vs_previous_release.html
> [16] 
> https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/detailed_test_results/vpp_performance_results/index.html
> [17] 
> https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/test_configuration/vpp_performance_configuration/index.html
> [18] 
> https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/dpdk_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html
> [19] 
> https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/dpdk_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/index.html
> [20] 
> https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/dpdk_performance_tests/packet_latency/index.html
> [21] 
> https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/dpdk_performance_tests/comparisons/current_vs_previous_release.html
> 
> 
> 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#16947): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/16947
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/75498644/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


[vpp-dev] Published: FD.io CSIT-2005 Release Report

2020-07-14 Thread Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) via lists.fd.io
Hi All,

FD.io CSIT-2005 report has been published on FD.io docs site:

https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/

Many thanks to All in CSIT, VPP and wider FD.io community who
contributed and worked hard to make CSIT-2005 happen!

See below for pointers to specific sections in the report.

Welcome all comments, best by email to csit-...@lists.fd.io.

Cheers,
-Maciek


Points of Note in the CSIT-2005 Report

Indexed specific links listed at the bottom.

1. VPP release notes
   a. Changes in CSIT-2005: [1]
   b. Known issues: [2]

2. VPP performance - 64B/IMIX throughput graphs (selected NIC models):
   a. Graphs explained: [3]
   b. L2 Ethernet Switching:[4]
   c. IPv4 Routing: [5]
   d. IPv6 Routing: [6]
   e. SRv6 Routing: [7]
   f. IPv4 Tunnels: [8]
   g. KVM VMs vhost-user:   [9]
   h. LXC/DRC Container Memif: [10]
   e. IPsec IPv4 Routing:  [11]
   f. Virtual Topology System: [12]

3. VPP performance - multi-core and latency graphs:
   a. Speedup Multi-Core:  [13]
   b. Latency: [14]

4. VPP performance comparisons
   a. VPP-20.05 vs. VPP-20.01:  [15]

5. VPP performance test details - all NICs:
   a. Detailed results 64B IMIX 1518B 9kB:  [16]
   b. Configuration:[17]

DPDK Testpmd and L3fwd performance sections follow similar structure.

6. DPDK applications:
  a. Release notes:   [18]
  b. DPDK performance - 64B throughput graphs:[19]
  c. DPDK performance - latency graphs:   [20]
  d. DPDK performance - DPDK-20.02 vs. DPDK-19.08: [21]

Functional device tests (VPP_Device) are also included in the report.

Specific links within the report:

 [1] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html#changes-in-csit-release
 [2] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html#known-issues
 [3] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/index.html
 [4] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/l2.html
 [5] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/ip4.html
 [6] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/ip6.html
 [7] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/srv6.html
 [8] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/ip4_tunnels.html
 [9] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/vm_vhost.html
[10] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/container_memif.html
[11] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/ipsec.html
[12] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/vts.html
[13] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/throughput_speedup_multi_core/index.html
[14] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_latency/index.html
[15] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/vpp_performance_tests/comparisons/current_vs_previous_release.html
[16] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/detailed_test_results/vpp_performance_results/index.html
[17] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/test_configuration/vpp_performance_configuration/index.html
[18] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/dpdk_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html
[19] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/dpdk_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/index.html
[20] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/dpdk_performance_tests/packet_latency/index.html
[21] 
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/dpdk_performance_tests/comparisons/current_vs_previous_release.html


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#16945): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/16945
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/75498644/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-