[Vserver] unixbench results: vanilla/1.9.1 host/1.9.1 vserver
Just FYI... Ran unixbench-4.1.0 on a test machine four times with the following kernel configurations; the value for each run is the final score output by unixbench. Complete unixbench output can be downloaded here: http://www.sculpturedlife.com/vserver/unixbench.tar.bz2 2.6.6 vanilla1: 495.1 vanilla2: 494.7 vanilla3: 493.6 vanilla4: 494.1 2.6.6-vs1.9.1 in host host1: 496.7 host2: 494.1 host3: 496.1 host4: 497.3 2.6.6-vs1.9.1 in vserver vserver1: 452.0 vserver2: 484.5 vserver3: 488.2 vserver4: 487.9 Test machine: Dual Xeon 2.8GHz Fedora Core 2 binutils-2.15.90.0.3 gcc-3.3.3 util-vserver-0.29-214 Cheers, Ryan ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] unixbench results: vanilla/1.9.1 host/1.9.1 vserver
On Fri, 21 May 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just FYI...
Ran unixbench-4.1.0 on a test machine four times with the following kernel
configurations; the value for each run is the final score output by unixbench.
Complete unixbench output can be downloaded here:
http://www.sculpturedlife.com/vserver/unixbench.tar.bz2
So Ryan. Could you explain for the 'kernelly-challenged' what these mean
-- in general?
Good, bad, or ugly?
Rod
--
Open Source Software - You usually get more than you pay for...
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] unixbench results: vanilla/1.9.1 host/1.9.1 vserver
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 11:19:26PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just FYI... thanks for checking this for us ... Roderick: I asked Ryan to do those tests for us to check the impact of linux vserver on typical applications ... Ran unixbench-4.1.0 on a test machine four times with the following kernel configurations; the value for each run is the final score output by unixbench. Complete unixbench output can be downloaded here: http://www.sculpturedlife.com/vserver/unixbench.tar.bz2 2.6.6 vanilla1: 495.1 vanilla2: 494.7 vanilla3: 493.6 vanilla4: 494.1 average = 494.3 +/- 0.6 2.6.6-vs1.9.1 in host host1: 496.7 host2: 494.1 host3: 496.1 host4: 497.3 average = 496 +/- 1.5 2.6.6-vs1.9.1 in vserver vserver1: 452.0 (ignored) vserver2: 484.5 vserver3: 488.2 vserver4: 487.9 average = 486.8 +/- 2 so the overhead of linux vserver on the host is not measurable (it seems that it is slightly faster than a vanilla kernel, but within the expected and measured noise) and the overhead inside a vserver is roughly 2% which leaves us with 98% of the native performance ... best, Herbert Test machine: Dual Xeon 2.8GHz Fedora Core 2 binutils-2.15.90.0.3 gcc-3.3.3 util-vserver-0.29-214 Cheers, Ryan ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] unixbench results: vanilla/1.9.1 host/1.9.1 vserver
Thanks, Ryan! It'd be interesting to see numbers for the same test on the same machine but using User-Mode Linux... :-) Grisha On Sat, 22 May 2004, Herbert Poetzl wrote: On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 11:19:26PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just FYI... thanks for checking this for us ... Roderick: I asked Ryan to do those tests for us to check the impact of linux vserver on typical applications ... Ran unixbench-4.1.0 on a test machine four times with the following kernel configurations; the value for each run is the final score output by unixbench. Complete unixbench output can be downloaded here: http://www.sculpturedlife.com/vserver/unixbench.tar.bz2 2.6.6 vanilla1: 495.1 vanilla2: 494.7 vanilla3: 493.6 vanilla4: 494.1 average = 494.3 +/- 0.6 2.6.6-vs1.9.1 in host host1: 496.7 host2: 494.1 host3: 496.1 host4: 497.3 average = 496 +/- 1.5 2.6.6-vs1.9.1 in vserver vserver1: 452.0 (ignored) vserver2: 484.5 vserver3: 488.2 vserver4: 487.9 average = 486.8 +/- 2 so the overhead of linux vserver on the host is not measurable (it seems that it is slightly faster than a vanilla kernel, but within the expected and measured noise) and the overhead inside a vserver is roughly 2% which leaves us with 98% of the native performance ... best, Herbert Test machine: Dual Xeon 2.8GHz Fedora Core 2 binutils-2.15.90.0.3 gcc-3.3.3 util-vserver-0.29-214 Cheers, Ryan ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
