Re: [Vserver] vserver 2.4.26-vs1.28 kernel rpm howto
BTW, Herbert -
I think it would be a good idea to change the vs patches so that they set
EXTRAVERSION in the top level Makefile to "vs1.29" (or whatever the
version), as opposed to "-vs1.29". It's not a big deal, but it looks like
the RPM naming system gives special maning to the "-", which makes it a
problem when you try to build a kernel RPM.
Thanks,
Grisha
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
If anyone is interested, here is how I was able to build a vs kernel RPM:
http://www.openvps.org/Plone/docs/developer/kernelrpm
Very nice. Thanks.
Rod
--
"Open Source Software - You usually get more than you pay for..."
"Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL"
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] [Release] Development vs1.9.2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herbert Poetzl) writes: >> > src/secure-mount.c no defined file sys/param.h, that provide PATH_MAX, and >> > sources not builded >> >> Thx; but this should not be an issue anymore as new code in CVS does not >> use PATH_MAX anymore. > > when will it be released as 0.30.191 or so? 0.30.191 will never appear try 0.30.193 instead of Enrico ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] two small problems with util-vserver-0.30.190 and heartbeat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas Schultz) writes: > I have two small problems with util-vserver-0.30.190 and > heartbeat-1.2.2. > ... > The return value should be changed to avoid the word 'running', maybe > inactive is acceptable? > > Second, a "vserver vs stop" returns a non zero exitcode in in case the > server didn't run before. Heartbeat comments that with a warning: > "heartbeat: WARN: it (vserver::vs) MUST succeed on a stop when already > stopped" > Changing the return code in vserver.stop for this case to 0 should not > have any ill effects on other scripts. Ok, I changed this in 0.30.193. Enrico ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] 2.4.27-vs1.29-rc2 :-))
On Friday 27 August 2004 18:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have it compiled and waiting. I will be rebooting 3 high-load > production machines from 2.4.23-vs1.22 and 2.4.25-vs1.26 into > 2.4.27-vs1.29-rc2. I will be sure to let you know of my results. > > -Josh Great to know that rc2 has got some other test user. Hopefully it won't break on high load. -- lg, Chris ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] vserver 2.4.26-vs1.28 kernel rpm howto
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
>
> If anyone is interested, here is how I was able to build a vs kernel RPM:
>
> http://www.openvps.org/Plone/docs/developer/kernelrpm
Very nice. Thanks.
Rod
--
"Open Source Software - You usually get more than you pay for..."
"Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL"
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
[Vserver] vserver 2.4.26-vs1.28 kernel rpm howto
If anyone is interested, here is how I was able to build a vs kernel RPM: http://www.openvps.org/Plone/docs/developer/kernelrpm (BTW - anyone feel free to copy this to copy this to the VServer wiki if you feel its appropriate) Grisha ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] 2.4.27-vs1.29-rc2 :-))
I have it compiled and waiting. I will be rebooting 3 high-load production machines from 2.4.23-vs1.22 and 2.4.25-vs1.26 into 2.4.27-vs1.29-rc2. I will be sure to let you know of my results. -Josh On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 09:03, Christian Mayrhuber wrote: > On Friday 20 August 2004 11:48, Christian Mayrhuber wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I haven't heard anything on the stability of vs1.29-rc2. > > I will let you know that vs1.29-rc2 is doing well with the following setup: > > > > Linux version 2.4.27-686-smp-vs1.29-rc2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.4 > > (Debian 1:3.3.4-3)) #1 SMP Wed Aug 11 20:28:34 CEST 2004 > > > > processor : 0 > > vendor_id : AuthenticAMD > > cpu family : 6 > > model : 4 > > model name : AMD Athlon(tm) Processor > > stepping: 2 > > cpu MHz : 1008.993 > > cache size : 256 KB > > fdiv_bug: no > > hlt_bug : no > > f00f_bug: no > > coma_bug: no > > fpu : yes > > fpu_exception : yes > > cpuid level : 1 > > wp : yes > > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca > > cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow > > bogomips: 2011.95 > > > > 768MB RAM > > > > Uptime: > > 11:27:27 up 8 days, 36 min, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.02, 0.01 > > > > Running the following vservers, all debian woody, except the build host > > which is on sarge: > > > > - bind9 > > - cvs trough ssh > > - syslog-ng + network/system monitoring software > > - squid > > - apache + chillisoft asp + php + tomcat + ftp test system > > - gcc build host > > > > The NIC is a Intel Corp. 82544GC Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev > > 2) > > > > VServers reside on a LVM volume on top of AMI Megaraid hardware raid. > > > > Filesystem in use is reiserfs + chris masons data logging patches > > mounted with data=ordered,rw,attrs > > > > Vserver utilities in use are (Debian woody backport): > > ii vserver 0.29-1 Virtual private servers and context switching > > > > I've not found any different behaviour to 2.4.26-vs1.27. > > The same holds true after 15 days of uptime :-)). > > Did anybody else try 2.4.27-vs1.29-rc2 on a spare or > productive machine? ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] 2.4.27-vs1.29-rc2 :-))
On Friday 20 August 2004 11:48, Christian Mayrhuber wrote: > Hi, > > I haven't heard anything on the stability of vs1.29-rc2. > I will let you know that vs1.29-rc2 is doing well with the following setup: > > Linux version 2.4.27-686-smp-vs1.29-rc2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.4 > (Debian 1:3.3.4-3)) #1 SMP Wed Aug 11 20:28:34 CEST 2004 > > processor : 0 > vendor_id : AuthenticAMD > cpu family : 6 > model : 4 > model name : AMD Athlon(tm) Processor > stepping: 2 > cpu MHz : 1008.993 > cache size : 256 KB > fdiv_bug: no > hlt_bug : no > f00f_bug: no > coma_bug: no > fpu : yes > fpu_exception : yes > cpuid level : 1 > wp : yes > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca > cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow > bogomips: 2011.95 > > 768MB RAM > > Uptime: > 11:27:27 up 8 days, 36 min, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.02, 0.01 > > Running the following vservers, all debian woody, except the build host > which is on sarge: > > - bind9 > - cvs trough ssh > - syslog-ng + network/system monitoring software > - squid > - apache + chillisoft asp + php + tomcat + ftp test system > - gcc build host > > The NIC is a Intel Corp. 82544GC Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev > 2) > > VServers reside on a LVM volume on top of AMI Megaraid hardware raid. > > Filesystem in use is reiserfs + chris masons data logging patches > mounted with data=ordered,rw,attrs > > Vserver utilities in use are (Debian woody backport): > ii vserver 0.29-1 Virtual private servers and context switching > > I've not found any different behaviour to 2.4.26-vs1.27. The same holds true after 15 days of uptime :-)). Did anybody else try 2.4.27-vs1.29-rc2 on a spare or productive machine? -- lg, Chris ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] [Release] Development vs1.9.2
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 03:53:51PM +0200, Enrico Scholz wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Ott) writes: > > > I try to build util-vserver-0.30.190 and found one bug - in > > src/secure-mount.c no defined file sys/param.h, that provide PATH_MAX, and > > sources not builded > > Thx; but this should not be an issue anymore as new code in CVS does not > use PATH_MAX anymore. when will it be released as 0.30.191 or so? TIA, Herbert > Enrico > ___ > Vserver mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] [Release] Development vs1.9.2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Ott) writes: > I try to build util-vserver-0.30.190 and found one bug - in > src/secure-mount.c no defined file sys/param.h, that provide PATH_MAX, and > sources not builded Thx; but this should not be an issue anymore as new code in CVS does not use PATH_MAX anymore. Enrico ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
