Re: [Vserver] [Release] Stable 2.0
Herbert Poetzl wrote: Greetings Community! after some time of testing and ironing out minor issues we proudly present the first stable release for the 2.6 kernels ... Great. Are there any changes from rc9? Per ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] [Release] Stable 2.0
Hello! Good Question! If diff'ed a little: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/linux-vserver$ diff patch-2.6.12.4-vs2.0.diff patch-2.6.12.3-vs2.0-rc9.diff |grep -v +++ |grep -v \-\-\- |egrep -v ^([0-9]+|..diff ) -EXTRAVERSION = .4 +EXTRAVERSION = .4-vs2.0 -EXTRAVERSION = .3 +EXTRAVERSION = .3-vs2.0-rc9 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/linux-vserver$ It seems that there is no change except extraversion. The old patch was vs. 2.6.12.3, the vs. 2.6.12.4, but it applies without any changes. And: Is Ola aware of the release, so we may urge him so pack it in Debain Sid soon? @herbert: It would make sense not to call the patches vs, becuase this could be misunderstood as versus - and it is not a patch versus an old 2.0 rgds, Andreas Per Andreas Buer wrote: Herbert Poetzl wrote: Greetings Community! after some time of testing and ironing out minor issues we proudly present the first stable release for the 2.6 kernels ... Great. Are there any changes from rc9? Per ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] [Release] Stable 2.0
Andreas John wrote: Hello! Good Question! If diff'ed a little: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/linux-vserver$ diff patch-2.6.12.4-vs2.0.diff patch-2.6.12.3-vs2.0-rc9.diff |grep -v +++ |grep -v \-\-\- |egrep -v ^([0-9]+|..diff ) -EXTRAVERSION = .4 +EXTRAVERSION = .4-vs2.0 -EXTRAVERSION = .3 +EXTRAVERSION = .3-vs2.0-rc9 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/linux-vserver$ It seems that there is no change except extraversion. The old patch was vs. 2.6.12.3, the vs. 2.6.12.4, but it applies without any changes. And: Is Ola aware of the release, so we may urge him so pack it in Debain Sid soon? @herbert: It would make sense not to call the patches vs, becuase this could be misunderstood as versus - and it is not a patch versus an old 2.0 rgds, Andreas Also, you could look at the change log: http://linux-vserver.org/ChangeLog26 Kevin ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] [Release] Stable 2.0
Also, you could look at the change log: http://linux-vserver.org/ChangeLog26 That would be far so easy ;) @herbert: Could you link the changelog form here: http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/s_rel26/v2.0/ ? rgds, Andreas ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] [Release] Stable 2.0
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 04:44:21PM +0200, Andreas John wrote: Hello! Good Question! If diff'ed a little: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/linux-vserver$ diff patch-2.6.12.4-vs2.0.diff patch-2.6.12.3-vs2.0-rc9.diff |grep -v +++ |grep -v \-\-\- |egrep -v ^([0-9]+|..diff ) -EXTRAVERSION = .4 +EXTRAVERSION = .4-vs2.0 -EXTRAVERSION = .3 +EXTRAVERSION = .3-vs2.0-rc9 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/linux-vserver$ It seems that there is no change except extraversion. The old patch was vs. 2.6.12.3, the vs. 2.6.12.4, but it applies without any changes. And: Is Ola aware of the release, so we may urge him so pack it in Debain Sid soon? actually also sarge would largely benefit from a stable linux-vserver version (maybe introduced as bugfix?) @herbert: It would make sense not to call the patches vs, becuase this could be misunderstood as versus - and it is not a patch versus an old 2.0 two letter acronym misinterpretation can always happen, even if I call it 'xy' and vserver folks by now _know_ that we have the following schema: patch-base-XYvers-extra.diff ... for patches which apply to base diff-version-a-version-b.diff ... for changes between versions delta-what-typeversion.diff ... for fixes, changes, addons ... and XY was always 'vs' for linux-vserver since a long time now ... so, sorry, but I don#t see a good reason to change it now ... best, Herbert rgds, Andreas Per Andreas Buer wrote: Herbert Poetzl wrote: Greetings Community! after some time of testing and ironing out minor issues we proudly present the first stable release for the 2.6 kernels ... Great. Are there any changes from rc9? Per ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] util-vserver bug submissions
Hello, I noticed also the #14034 bug behavior. But it may be coming from the character - I use for the vservers ex: /etc/vservers/centos3-test/... /etc/vservers/centos4-test/... because I don't have the problem with : /etc/vservers/mserver1/... /etc/vservers/mserver2/... There is also a bug with the vwait that don't timeout after 30 seconds.. regards, Kevin Pendleton wrote: FYI, I have submitted the following bug reports/feature requests to Savannah on util-vserver: #14034 Vserver shutdown does not remove IP address #14033 vdlimit --all or vdlimit-stat (Feature Request) #14032 vsomething does not work properly #14026 vdlimit performs vc_add_limit() before validation Kevin ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver -- Jean-Christophe Petit Directeur RD et DSI Syspark inc. T: 1 514 875 8755 F: 1 514 875 8775 ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] [Release] Stable 2.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andreas John wrote: Hello! Good Question! If diff'ed a little: And: Is Ola aware of the release, so we may urge him so pack it in Debain Sid soon? I've been working on the debian package for the kernel-patch (kernel-patch-vserver), and as soon as I saw the release last night, I tested the patch against the latest kernel-source in debian (linux-source-2.6.12), and then uploaded a new package with the new patch. Also, the other day I was sick of people complaining that the util-vserver tools were out of date in debian, so I filed a bug against the package asking Ola to update them and he said he would do so right away. micah 1. http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kernel-patch-vserver/news/1.html 2. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=321659 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC94zD9n4qXRzy1ioRAgKIAJ9tii3E1TuVevksfmxB6gouWulLwACeMtDv L6vX/4+Txn4P9pLK/FxSpNs= =ldQX -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] [Release] Stable 2.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Micah! Thanks for uploading the patch! Please forgive that I didn't notice that Ola is only responsible for util-vserver. I'll change the my homegrown binary 2.6.12 686 (see linux-vserver.org) to a compilation of your original Debian Sid release, which I provide for the convenience of beginners (as well as a .208 .deb of util-vserver) rgds, Andreas Micah wrote: | Andreas John wrote: | |Hello! | |Good Question! If diff'ed a little: | | |And: Is Ola aware of the release, so we may urge him so pack it in |Debain Sid soon? | | | I've been working on the debian package for the kernel-patch | (kernel-patch-vserver), and as soon as I saw the release last night, I | tested the patch against the latest kernel-source in debian | (linux-source-2.6.12), and then uploaded a new package with the new patch. | | Also, the other day I was sick of people complaining that the | util-vserver tools were out of date in debian, so I filed a bug against | the package asking Ola to update them and he said he would do so right away. | | micah | | 1. http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kernel-patch-vserver/news/1.html | 2. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=321659 ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver - -- Andreas John net-lab GmbH Luisenstrasse 30b 63067 Offenbach Tel: +49 69 85700331 http://www.net-lab.net -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC947aeaoNgggFH2wRAguZAJ4+7dbQtASDb/CcDRt3477BP0SbUwCgr6Qe qsLHOdjHuW16N/NtSlzL1h8= =8Cv5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Trivial Question #3: process limit (or is this a feature request?)
Dariush Pietrzak,,, wrote: Good luck to all! Thanks! Do I get it right, that there is no possibility to set per guest ulimits in the conf of vs20? I only found the possibility to set a ulimit or nproc flag in /etc/vservers/foo/flags, which is only for appying the current (i.e. the hosts) ulimit to the guest. I guess there can only be one ulimit in the (host) kernel, in our particular case for user root, so all guests share one common umlinit unless it set nproc in the flags? ---quote--- nproc Limit the number of process in the vserver according to ulimit setting. Normally, ulimit is a per user thing. With this flag, it becomes a per vserver thing. --- So, if I want to keep the guests umlimit reasonably low, I have to set the ulimit for root low rgds, Andreas ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] [Release] Stable 2.0
Hello! Am Montag 08 August 2005 00:46 schrieb Herbert Poetzl: Greetings Community! after some time of testing and ironing out minor issues we proudly present the first stable release for the 2.6 kernels ... http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/s_rel26/v2.0/ (tools supposed to work fine on Mandrake 10.x) Good Job man, vserver really rocks ;) And you are on heise.de, look http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/62592 Greetings, MS ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Trivial Question #3: process limit (or is this a feature request?)
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 05:53:30PM +0200, Andreas John wrote: Dariush Pietrzak,,, wrote: Good luck to all! Thanks! Do I get it right, that there is no possibility to set per guest ulimits in the conf of vs20? I only found the possibility to set a ulimit or nproc flag in /etc/vservers/foo/flags, which is only for appying the current (i.e. the hosts) ulimit to the guest. I guess there can only be one ulimit in the (host) kernel, in our particular case for user root, so all guests share one common umlinit unless it set nproc in the flags? /etc/vservers/vserver-name/ulimits A directory with ulimits. Possible resources are cpu, data, fsize, locks, memlock, nofile, nproc, rss and/or stack. /etc/vservers/vserver-name/rlimits A directory with resource limits. Possible resources are cpu, fsize, data, stack, core, rss, nproc, nofile, memlock, as and locks. This configuration will be honored for kernel 2.6 only. and from the 0.30.208 changelog: 2005-07-15 21:01 Enrico Scholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] * scripts/: vserver.start, vserver.suexec: readded the limit-ulimits-per-vserver stuff due popular request (http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=12840) so the essential answers are: - yes, you _can_ set ulimits for 2.6 kernels - no, you don't want to use nproc or ulimit as flag - usually you want to set rlimits not ulimits (because the ulimits are controlled by the distro) ---quote--- nproc Limit the number of process in the vserver according to ulimit setting. Normally, ulimit is a per user thing. With this flag, it becomes a per vserver thing. --- this was true about 1 year ago, it should also be supported to some extend by the legacy tools .. but in general, you do not want to use/have it nowadays ... So, if I want to keep the guests umlimit reasonably low, I have to set the ulimit for root low no, see answer above ... HTH, Herbert rgds, Andreas ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] [Release] Stable 2.0
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 06:57:00PM +0200, Andreas John wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Micah! Thanks for uploading the patch! Please forgive that I didn't notice that Ola is only responsible for util-vserver. I'll change the my homegrown binary 2.6.12 686 (see linux-vserver.org) to a compilation of your original Debian Sid release, which I provide for the convenience of beginners (as well as a .208 .deb of util-vserver) please check the patch(es) I provide against util-vserver 0.30.208, as they will either extend functionality or fix known issues ... http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/s_rel26/v2.0/patch-0.30.208-fix01.diff.bz2 (for now) TIA, Herbert rgds, Andreas Micah wrote: | Andreas John wrote: | |Hello! | |Good Question! If diff'ed a little: | | |And: Is Ola aware of the release, so we may urge him so pack it in |Debain Sid soon? | | | I've been working on the debian package for the kernel-patch | (kernel-patch-vserver), and as soon as I saw the release last night, I | tested the patch against the latest kernel-source in debian | (linux-source-2.6.12), and then uploaded a new package with the new patch. | | Also, the other day I was sick of people complaining that the | util-vserver tools were out of date in debian, so I filed a bug against | the package asking Ola to update them and he said he would do so right away. | | micah | | 1. http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kernel-patch-vserver/news/1.html | 2. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=321659 ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver - -- Andreas John net-lab GmbH Luisenstrasse 30b 63067 Offenbach Tel: +49 69 85700331 http://www.net-lab.net -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC947aeaoNgggFH2wRAguZAJ4+7dbQtASDb/CcDRt3477BP0SbUwCgr6Qe qsLHOdjHuW16N/NtSlzL1h8= =8Cv5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
[Vserver] Auto-Restart after systemcrash / gentoo init-style
Hi List, today my host crashed du to some bad conditions...and I found a very stupid issue I run gentoo (host and guest) with 2.6 kernel and recent tools. The vServers are guarded by a heartbeat installation. Now my hardware crahed, the external server-watchdog rebootet the maschine and the host came up fine, BUT my vServers didnt start. As the servers crahsed during runtime the /var/lib/init.d inside the guests indicated a running system and so the vserver start command was ineffectiv on all vServers. Is there any tool or flag to force the start of a (gentoo) vServer even if the init.d directory is not empty ? Oliver -- Diese Nachricht wurde digital unterschrieben oliwel's public key: http://www.oliwel.de/oliwel.crt Basiszertifikat: http://www.ldv.ei.tum.de/page72 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Feature Request: comment char in VS20/new-style
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas John) writes: I wanted to create commented version of /etc/vservers/foo/flags, but I was not able to find the right char for commenting out a line, neither # nor ; worked even // was not the solution. Sorry; bug in util-vserver. Afair, somebody else mentioned it already but I lost track of it. Should be now really fixed in CVS. I suspect the is at the time no way to comment out in new-style format? No; but '# .. comment ...' should work in 0.30.209+. Enrico pgpHXbKYaPq0K.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] running old style vservers on vs2.0-rc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bert De Vuyst) writes: During some tests with the vserver 2.0-rc, I did have a problemen running vservers with a old style configuration. The vservers do run fine, but the vserver utils (vps, vserver-stat) can't display the vserver it's name. I run 2 vservers in the next example. testserv1 uses the new style config (and context 14), testserv2 uses the old style config (and context 27), When I run vserver-stat, I get net next output: CTX PROCVSZRSS userTIME sysTIMEUPTIME NAME 0 68 247.9M 6.5K 30m57s73 13m10s83 7d05h34 root server 14 7 14.4M 1.5K 30m41s50 52m36s55 6d47h03 testserv1 27 9 34.1M 2.9K 0m00s12 0m00s00 0m09s70 The XID - name mapping is not implemented for legacy configurations. As legacy configuration does not have a big future and *would* need security fixes first, this has a very low priority. Enrico pgpJSj7hPgRSz.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] vserver build and no rpm displayed..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Christophe Petit) writes: 2.6.12.3-vs2.0-rc9 with util-vserver-0.30.208 under CentOS 4 followed the http://linux-vserver.org/CentOS_HowTo when in the vserver, rpm -qa gives nothing. Expected; external packagemangement is used by default which holds rpm database outside of the vserver. When you *really* need it, 'vserver ... pkgmgmt internalize' should copy it into the vserver so that 'rpm -q' works there. But for most vserver types, the external management should suffice. I have the /.rpmdb/ in place with files inside: bash-3.00# ls -la /.rpmdb/ total 504 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root4096 Aug 3 05:12 . drwxr-xr-x 22 root root4096 Aug 3 05:04 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 16384 Aug 3 05:08 __db.001 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1318912 Aug 3 05:08 __db.002 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 450560 Aug 3 05:08 __db.003 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 12288 Aug 3 05:12 Group ... These files were created by your 'rpm -q' operation which initializes the rpm database. Enrico pgpGynO0yx3SF.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] vserver build and no rpm displayed..
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 12:24:34AM +0200, Enrico Scholz wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Christophe Petit) writes: 2.6.12.3-vs2.0-rc9 with util-vserver-0.30.208 under CentOS 4 followed the http://linux-vserver.org/CentOS_HowTo when in the vserver, rpm -qa gives nothing. Expected; external packagemangement is used by default which holds rpm database outside of the vserver. When you *really* need it, 'vserver ... pkgmgmt internalize' should copy it into the vserver so that 'rpm -q' works there. But for most vserver types, the external management should suffice. well, probably depends on the application ... I guess the 'typical' vps provider, which wants to give a guest to the customer is not too happy about an external package management (and probably the customer will not be too happy either), but as you said, it's configurable which should suffice ... best, Herbert I have the /.rpmdb/ in place with files inside: bash-3.00# ls -la /.rpmdb/ total 504 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root4096 Aug 3 05:12 . drwxr-xr-x 22 root root4096 Aug 3 05:04 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 16384 Aug 3 05:08 __db.001 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1318912 Aug 3 05:08 __db.002 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 450560 Aug 3 05:08 __db.003 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 12288 Aug 3 05:12 Group ... These files were created by your 'rpm -q' operation which initializes the rpm database. an option at vserver creation time would be nice to have though ... maybe it's already there but not documented yet? (like the ulimits on 2.6) thanks, Herbert Enrico ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
[Fwd: Re: [Vserver] [Release] Stable 2.0]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am forwarding this message to the debian bug ID related to updating the util-vserver tools to the latest version. Ola, please be sure to apply the patch that Herbert provides for util-vserver to fix some additional known issues. micah Herbert Poetzl wrote: please check the patch(es) I provide against util-vserver 0.30.208, as they will either extend functionality or fix known issues ... http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/s_rel26/v2.0/patch-0.30.208-fix01.diff.bz2 (for now) TIA, Herbert -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC9/Zb9n4qXRzy1ioRAuUFAJ91R499Tu+4YzGlmzWAcMPOU26CzACfeHUM rSoktoRSQHkCDORkOMNDy2g= =etSm -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Auto-Restart after systemcrash / gentoo init-style
On Monday 08 August 2005 23:55, Oliver Welter wrote: Hi List, today my host crashed du to some bad conditions...and I found a very stupid issue I run gentoo (host and guest) with 2.6 kernel and recent tools. The vServers are guarded by a heartbeat installation. Now my hardware crahed, the external server-watchdog rebootet the maschine and the host came up fine, BUT my vServers didnt start. As the servers crahsed during runtime the /var/lib/init.d inside the guests indicated a running system and so the vserver start command was ineffectiv on all vServers. Is there any tool or flag to force the start of a (gentoo) vServer even if the init.d directory is not empty ? Oliver use plain init style, or put a /sbin/depscan.sh after the sysboot section in /sbin/rc ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
[Vserver] Migrating virtualised hosts from 1.2.x to 2.0
Hi All, Fantastic to see 2.0 is finally out. Great work guys! I currently have a server configured with about 6 virtualised hosts / contexts on VServer 1.2 on Fedora Core 1 - the virtualised hosts are also running Fedora Core 1. I'm about to set up another server running FC 4 with the new VServer 2.0 and would like to know - is there anything special I need to do when it comes to migrating contexts from the 1.2 to 2.0 VServer? If possible, I'd like to keep all contexts running FC1 at this stage whilst the host server itself will be running FC4. I will be testing this before I do a full migration, but would like to know if there are any problems I can expect to face with this. Regards, Jonathan ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
