Re: [Vserver] vrsetup : No such device or address
Joerg Maier wrote: Hi, i got an issuem with vrsetup to configure a block device to quota_ctl inside a vserver. I am using vs2.1.1-rc48 from linux-vserver.org on a vanilla kernel. Why such an old kernel? 2.1.1.7.1 is the latest release of the 2.1 branch, but you're really suggested to use 2.2.0-rc8.7... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/vservers# vrsetup /dev/vroot/mail /dev/vgsystem/lvmail open(/dev/vroot/mail): No such device or address You _did_ enable vroot support in your kernel, and if you compiled it as a module, it _is_ loaded, right? -- Daniel Hokka Zakrisson ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] vrsetup : No such device or address
Hi, Why such an old kernel? 2.1.1.7.1 is the latest release of the 2.1 branch, but you're really suggested to use 2.2.0-rc8.7... I found the 2.1 version is almost stable and thats what i wanted as the machine will go productive soon. Do you think the 2.2 version is stable in the same amount as 2.1 is? You _did_ enable vroot support in your kernel, and if you compiled it as a module, it _is_ loaded, right? i was too braindead to see the config option in block devices. Thanks for the fast reply. Will get back if i still get issues after a compile and load but i think thats it. Thanks a lot. Joerg ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] vrsetup : No such device or address
Joerg Maier wrote: Hi, Why such an old kernel? 2.1.1.7.1 is the latest release of the 2.1 branch, but you're really suggested to use 2.2.0-rc8.7... I found the 2.1 version is almost stable and thats what i wanted as the machine will go productive soon. Do you think the 2.2 version is stable in the same amount as 2.1 is? Given that 2.2 is the next stable series, and it's mostly the same code as 2.1, I'd say so. 2.1.1-rc48 has a few rather serious bugs too, IIRC. -- Daniel Hokka Zakrisson ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
[Vserver] quota problem
Hey, After upgrade from: 2.6.17.11-vs2.1.1-rc31 to: 2.6.19.2-vs2.2.0-rc8.7 i noticed, that quota don't work form me anymore. I got error message: quotaon -a quotaon: using //qquota.group on /dev/hdv1 [/]: No such device quotaon: using //qquota.user on /dev/hdv1 [/]: No such device /etc/fstab /dev/hdv1 / ext3defaults,usrquota,grpquota1 1 /etc/mtab /dev/hdv1 / ufs defaults,noatime,usrquota,grpquota 0 0 /proc/mounts /dev/root / ext3 rw,tag,data=ordered,usrquota,grpquota 0 0 This problem is similar to this : http://www.paul.sladen.org/vserver/archives/200509/0077.html Jarek ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] vrsetup : No such device or address
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 11:41:58AM +0100, Joerg Maier wrote: Hi, Why such an old kernel? 2.1.1.7.1 is the latest release of the 2.1 branch, but you're really suggested to use 2.2.0-rc8.7... I found the 2.1 version is almost stable and thats what i wanted as the machine will go productive soon. Do you think the 2.2 version is stable in the same amount as 2.1 is? as you said, 2.1 is _almost_ stable, while 2.2.0 _is_ stable (remember 2.1.x is a development branch?) so I guess you are definitely better off with 2.2.0 regarding stability HTC, Herbert You _did_ enable vroot support in your kernel, and if you compiled it as a module, it _is_ loaded, right? i was too braindead to see the config option in block devices. Thanks for the fast reply. Will get back if i still get issues after a compile and load but i think thats it. Thanks a lot. Joerg ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
