Re: [Vserver] Vserver Chkrootkit result: SIGINVISIBLE Adore found
Hi! Possible LKM Trojan installed found!!! Please keep in mind, that LKM seems to be a false positive many times with chkrootkit, because chkrootkit in this case seems to test only against processes that don't show up everywhere (afaik a diff with ps and /proc). Please rescan after a reboot or so and look at this: Manfred Sindhoff wrote 22 May 2004 in debian-user-german: The lkm check is known to produce false positives for NPTL kernels (2.6 kernels or 2.4 with NPTL patches). Common multithreaded programs which will show this behaviour are slapd, mozilla and apache2 if you use one of its threading MPMs. (http://www.wiggy.net/debian/developer-securing/) hth, Daniel ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] debian guest under fedora core 4 errors messages
Hi Jean-Marc! Cleaning up ifupdown...done. Deactivating swap...umount: none: not found umount: /tmp: must be superuser to umount Not superuser. done. Unmounting local filesystems...umount: none: not found umount: /tmp: must be superuser to umount umount: /dev/hdv1: not found umount: /: must be superuser to umount Saving the System Clock time to the Hardware Clock... hwclock is unable to get I/O port access: the iopl(3) call failed. Hardware Clock updated to Fri Mar 17 07:17:18 UTC 2006. cd /vservers/$NAME/etc/ rm rc0.d/K20makedev rc0.d/K25hwclock.sh rc0.d/S30urandom rc0.d/S31umountnfs.sh rm rc0.d/S35networking rc0.d/S36ifupdown rc0.d/S40umountfs rc0.d/S90halt rc0.d/K89klogd rm rc6.d/K20makedev rc6.d/K25hwclock.sh rc6.d/S30urandom rc6.d/S31umountnfs.sh rm rc6.d/S35networking rc6.d/S36ifupdown rc6.d/S40umountfs rc6.d/S90reboot rc6.d/K89klogd rm rcS.d/S05keymap.sh rcS.d/S48console-screen.sh rcS.d/S50hwclock.sh rcS.d/S40networking rm rcS.d/S45mountnfs.sh rcS.d/S10checkroot.sh rcS.d/S02mountvirtfs rm rcS.d/S30procps.sh rcS.d/S35mountall.sh rcS.d/S36mountvirtfs rcS.d/S39ifupdown rm rcS.d/S30checkfs.sh rcS.d/S18ifupdown-clean rcS.d/S18hwclockfirst.sh rm rc2.d/S20makedev rc2.d/S11klogd hth, Daniel -- Daniel Kraft Heilmeyersteige 131 D-89075 Ulm Tel: +49 700 572383-66 Fax: +49 700 572383-29 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Interessant: * Nachrichten: http://www.szon.de * Kostenlose Abos: http://www.regio-abo.de * Motorräder: http://www.honda-kraft.de * Autos: http://www.autohaus-kraft.de ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
[Vserver] 32 bit debian/sarge on a 64 bit RedHat ES?
Hi List! I will get some Dual-Xeon-Servers soon and have to install RedHat ES on them. I want to install debian/sarge-based linux-vservers on top of the RedHat. I have the choice between RedHat ES 32 bit and RedHat ES 64 bit. The questions are: 1. Can I have a 32 bit debian/sarge on a 64 bit RedHat or will I have to install a 64 bit debian? 2. Is it possible to patch a RedHat Kernel with linux-vserver? I don't want to use a patched vanilla kernel on these systems. Are there pre-patched RedHat-Kernels? 3. Should I use RedHat ES 32 bit and just ignore the ~20% performance loss for comfortability? Thanks for any hints! Daniel ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] VServer logo?
Hi! Guenther Fuchs wrote: anyone graphically talented created a logo for VServer yet or wants to? I guess, there's not only me wanting to show a powered by Linux- VServer on their page ;-) Some of my ideas. If the font-rendering looks strange, this is due to my anti-aliasing (sub-pixel). Please tell me if you have any problems. http://www.spotlite.de/stuff/vserver-logos.png License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ IF one of those WOULD become the logo - or part of it, we can of course change the license to a compatible one. In case someone knows a logo that looks similar, PLEASE TELL ME to prevent legal issues! Daniel PS: My favorite one among those in ASCII: O O ° O O O Linux VServer ;) ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] VServer logo?
Simon Garner wrote: On 9/01/2006 12:29 p.m., Daniel Kraft wrote: http://www.spotlite.de/stuff/vserver-logos.png License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ In case someone knows a logo that looks similar, PLEASE TELL ME to prevent legal issues! It looks to me a lot like the logo for rackspace.com ... sorry! Thanks for the hint, Simon! At least the vertical ones are a little similar to a part of that logo. And as this is a hosting-provider who does what Linux-VServer often is used for, it would probarbly be a better idea not to consider to use a similar logo. So the three on the left side would be left over. So please just ignore the ones on the right side for the moment. Daniel ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Re: Vserver newbie question
[eMAXX] Sys-Admin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) schrieb: The main concern I have, is to keep Vserver updated when it's running. Debian got a great packiging system, but how should I upgrade Vserver (that was build from scratch) when a new version is released? Build again from scratch? That's why I tried the sources from http://linux-vserver.derjohn.de/ first. I saw Debian unstable adopted util-vserver-0.30.208 (http://packages.debian.org/unstable/net/util-vserver), but I'm want to use the stable branch. Should I mix? I had no problem using the unstable branch for util-vserver. I needed it, because the sarge-versions are simply too old. I compiled a vanilla-kernel (2.6.12.6) with the patch-2.6.12.4-vs2.0.diff. I did this the traditional way, but the debian-way (make-kpgk) should work too. That way you have your packaged kernel (but I guess you knew that ;) ). Btw: I used the original config from debian (/boot/config.xxx). Then I compiled the sources from debian-sid for util-vserver. You can find a short summary here: http://linux-vserver.org/util-vserver+on+sarge Using apt-get -t unstable should work too, but I preferred compiling it myself. When a new version comes out, I simply patch a new kernel and make new packages from sid's sources and dpkg -i them. To much decisions to make ...what's wise to do? I'll have to meditate about this... Daniel ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
