Re: [Vserver] Linux (2.6.10) Patch Vserver (1.9.4) + Grsecurity (2.1.1-2.6.10-as2-20050124225)
On Wednesday 02 March 2005 18:16, Benjamin GIGON wrote: Hi everybody :-) I'm not sure if it's usefull, but I merged latest grsec (2.1.1-2.6.10-as2-20050124225) and latest vserver (1.9.4) under Linux 2.6.10. I suppose that it doesn't exist; however Doener say me that IIRC DaPhreak has already merged this. I haven't found this patch, so I decided to create this. Sorry if it already exist [ ... ] See'ya :-) Yeah, Doener was right :) I _tried_ to get it working but due to some nasty typos (or something else) the grsec-vserver hadn't compiled here. As for this, I would have looked into it again this weekend (school sucks ;) ) Thanks a lot :) Greets Christian a.k.a. DaPhreak ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
[Vserver] Linux (2.6.10) Patch Vserver (1.9.4) + Grsecurity (2.1.1-2.6.10-as2-20050124225)
Hi everybody :-) I'm not sure if it's usefull, but I merged latest grsec (2.1.1-2.6.10-as2-20050124225) and latest vserver (1.9.4) under Linux 2.6.10. I suppose that it doesn't exist; however Doener say me that IIRC DaPhreak has already merged this. I haven't found this patch, so I decided to create this. Sorry if it already exist Patch is available here : - linux-2.6.10-grsecurity-2.1.1-2.6.10-as2-200501242254-Vserver-1.9.4.patch [Mar 2 2005] (1.1M) http://team.lea-linux.org/bgigon/vserver/linux-2.6.10-grsecurity-2.1.1-2.6.10-as2-200501242254-Vserver-1.9.4.patch - linux-2.6.10-grsecurity-2.1.1-2.6.10-as2-200501242254-Vserver-1.9.4.patch.gz [Mar 2 2005] (258 k) http://team.lea-linux.org/bgigon/vserver/linux-2.6.10-grsecurity-2.1.1-2.6.10-as2-200501242254-Vserver-1.9.4.patch.gz - linux-2.6.10-grsecurity-2.1.1-2.6.10-as2-200501242254-Vserver-1.9.4.patch.md5sum [Mar 2 2005 ] (219 oct.) http://team.lea-linux.org/bgigon/vserver/linux-2.6.10-grsecurity-2.1.1-2.6.10-as2-200501242254-Vserver-1.9.4.patch.md5sum See'ya :-) -- Benjamin GIGON mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sherpadown.net ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Linux (2.6.10) Patch Vserver (1.9.4) + Grsecurity (2.1.1-2.6.10-as2-20050124225)
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 06:16:09PM +0100, Benjamin GIGON wrote: Hi everybody :-) I'm not sure if it's usefull, but I merged latest grsec (2.1.1-2.6.10-as2-20050124225) and latest vserver (1.9.4) under Linux 2.6.10. Alas, 2.6.11 release has just been announced. Thanks nevertheless! Speaking of which, while Xen is moving towards being included in the main kernel, is there any chance VServer patch ever will? -- Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a __ ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE http://moleculardevices.org http://nanomachines.net pgpbeBZ8lYCVP.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Linux (2.6.10) Patch Vserver (1.9.4) + Grsecurity (2.1.1-2.6.10-as2-20050124225)
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 07:05:43PM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote: On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 06:16:09PM +0100, Benjamin GIGON wrote: Hi everybody :-) I'm not sure if it's usefull, but I merged latest grsec (2.1.1-2.6.10-as2-20050124225) and latest vserver (1.9.4) under Linux 2.6.10. Alas, 2.6.11 release has just been announced. Thanks nevertheless! Speaking of which, while Xen is moving towards being included in the main sorry but xen will _never_ be included into mainline ... what will hopefully happen soon is that support for the xen architecture will be included into mainline ... now what's the difference here? simple, you can't run linux on xen right now (without some major patching) so there need to be some adjustments (like there where for x86_64) to allow for unmodified (but built for the xen architecture) kernels to run on a xen platform ... now as we know, linux-vserver has no big problem with unpatched kernels, as there is no kernel which will be run inside a vserver guest (in contrary to UML which is already an architecture supported by the linux kernel) what will the inclusion of the xen arch in mainline change regarding linux-vserver? not much, well yes, it will be possible to install linux vserver kernels on xen platforms (as linux-vserver is primarily against mainline kernels and strives to support many archs) kernel, is there any chance VServer patch ever will? well, actually I do not really consider linux-vserver so general that it should be on every linux box, be it my mobile phone or your favorite linux game engine it's very specific software and I guess it's not worth the code in mainline when it is used by, let's say 1% of the linux kernel users ... of course we are trying (and often we succeed) to get various independant features in mainline, reducing the total patch size as much as possible ... HTH, Herbert -- Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a __ ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE http://moleculardevices.org http://nanomachines.net ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Linux (2.6.10) Patch Vserver (1.9.4) + Grsecurity (2.1.1-2.6.10-as2-20050124225)
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Herbert Poetzl wrote: kernel, is there any chance VServer patch ever will? well, actually I do not really consider linux-vserver so general that it should be on every linux box, be it my mobile phone or your favorite linux game engine it's very specific software and I guess it's not worth the code in mainline when it is used by, let's say 1% of the linux kernel users ... But on the other hand this (or very similar) functionality is standard in FreeBSD and Solaris. Grisha ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Linux (2.6.10) Patch Vserver (1.9.4) + Grsecurity (2.1.1-2.6.10-as2-20050124225)
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 04:03:11PM -0500, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Herbert Poetzl wrote: kernel, is there any chance VServer patch ever will? well, actually I do not really consider linux-vserver so general that it should be on every linux box, be it my mobile phone or your favorite linux game engine it's very specific software and I guess it's not worth the code in mainline when it is used by, let's say 1% of the linux kernel users ... But on the other hand this (or very similar) functionality is standard in FreeBSD and Solaris. yes, except that IMHO the FreeBSD jail is a better chroot() with none of the resource or virtualization features present in linux-vserver and solaris is bloated anyways ... but don't get me wrong here, if the mainline folks manage to agree on some 'common' stuff which they want to see included, I'll be the last person to stand in their way ... It's just not a priority for me to get it into mainline at any cost ... hope that clarifies, Herbert Grisha ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
