[Vyatta-users] install-system not working

2007-11-24 Thread Rodrigo Romero III
I'm trying to install VC3 on a server but it's giving me this error:

vyatta:/# install-system
Welcome to the Vyatta install program.  This script
will walk you through the process of installing the
Vyatta image to a local hard drive.

Would you like to continue? (Yes/No) [Yes]:
Probing drives: OK
The Vyatta image will require a minimum 450MB root
partition and a minimum 10MB configuration partition.
Would you like me to try to partition a drive automatically
or would you rather partition it manually with parted?  If
you have already setup your partitions, you may skip this step.

Partition (Auto/Parted/Skip) [Auto]:

I found the following drives on your system:
 sda8MB


Install the image on? [sda]:

This will destroy all data on /dev/sda.
Continue? (Yes/No) [No]: Yes

Cannot mount /dev/sda1.
Please see install.log for more details.
Exiting..
vyatta:/# vi install.log
turning off swaps...
Cannot mount /dev/sda1.
mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/tmp
Exiting...
mount: you must specify the filesystem type

-- 
Rodrigo Romero III
General Manager
Avetti Global Services Corp.
An Avetti.com Company
__

NOTE: This e-mail is confidential and is intended only for the recipient(s) 
listed. Unauthorized use, disclosure, total or partial retention, 
dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or the information 
contained in it is strictly prohibited and sanctioned by law. If you receive 
this message in error, or you are not a listed recipient or someone authorized 
to receive e-mail on behalf of a listed recipient, please reply to the sender 
that the e-mail was misdirected and delete the e-mail. Thank you.

NOTA: Este correo electronico es confidencial y esta dirigido unicamente a los 
destinatarios listados. El uso no  autorizado, divulgación, la total o parcial 
retención, diseminacion, distribucion o copia de este mensaje o la informacion 
contenida en el es estrictamente prohibida y es sancionada por la ley. Si usted 
recibe este mensaje por error, o usted no es uno de los destinatarios listados 
o una persona autorizada a recibir correo electronico en beneficio de uno de 
los destinatarios listados, favor responder al autor e informar que el correo 
electronico fue erroneamente dirigido a usted y elimine (borre) el correo . 
Gracias.

___
Vyatta-users mailing list
Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users


[Vyatta-users] routing policies

2007-11-21 Thread Rodrigo Romero III
hi, how do i define routing policies on vyatta community server 3 when i 
have 2 inside networks and 2 ISPs and i want one network to use one ISP 
and the other network to use the other ISP only.

second question: and it's not for this same installation, however this 
one also has 2 ISPs; how do i define multiple ISPs so the networks can 
load balance traffic without using BGP or RIP? can I add two static 
routes to the 0.0.0.0?

regards,

-- 
Rodrigo Romero III
General Manager
Avetti Global Services Corp.
An Avetti.com Company

___
Vyatta-users mailing list
Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users


Re: [Vyatta-users] VLANs, NAT and DHCP scenario with multiple ISP

2007-11-20 Thread Rodrigo Romero III
how about the static routes and the gateway? should I declare a default 
Gateway or leave it in blank? I want one network, the one with the 
private network and NAT to go out using one vif (ISP1) and the Servers 
to go out using another vif (ISP2).

Aubrey Wells wrote:
> forwarding is already on for routing. your nat needs to look something 
> like:
>
> service {
> nat {
> rule 10 {
> type: "masquerade"
> outbound-interface: "eth1.201"
> source {
> network: "192.168.1.0/24"
> }
> destination {
> network: "0.0.0.0/0"
> }
> }
> rule 20 {
> type: "masquerade"
> outbound-interface: "eth1.201"
> source {
> network: "192.168.5.0/24"
> }
> destination {
> network: "0.0.0.0/0"
> }
> }
>
>
>
> ----------
> Aubrey Wells
> Senior Engineer
> Shelton | Johns Technology Group
> 404.478.2790
> www.sheltonjohns.com
>
>
>
> On Nov 20, 2007, at 4:35 PM, Rodrigo Romero III wrote:
>
>> i'll try that,
>> now for NAT on Private Network: what is the configuration for the
>> private network to go out using a specific vif and masquerade the IP to
>> use the one there on the vif?
>>
>> and for Routing: do i need to enable forwarding or something?
>>
>>
>> Aubrey Wells wrote:
>>> to specify a vif ethernet interface, its .>> id> ie: for vlan 201 on interfce eth2, you'd say eth2.201
>>>
>>> You're going to have a problem with dhcp on a vif, as I found out. see
>>> bug 2447 for two possible workarounds..
>>> https://bugzilla.vyatta.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2447
>>>
>>> do one of those workarounds, and it will work fine. it wont ask for an
>>> interface, you just define the subnet to hand out.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Aubrey Wells
>>> Senior Engineer
>>> Shelton | Johns Technology Group
>>> 404.478.2790
>>> www.sheltonjohns.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 20, 2007, at 4:04 PM, Rodrigo Romero III wrote:
>>>
>>>> This scenario is very uncommon.  I have a Fedora box with 3 NICs, and
>>>> for security reasons I'll name all the Public Addresses with 
>>>> 172.16.x.x
>>>> IPs, and Private IPs will be 192.168.0.x:
>>>> eth0: ISP1-172.16.10.2/30
>>>> eth0.1: ISP2-172.16.20.2/30
>>>> eth1: Users-192.168.0.62/26
>>>> eth2: Servers-172.16.30.1/28
>>>> Eth0 goes to a hub that has both ISPs connected to it.  Eth1 (Users
>>>> Network) uses DHCP  and it is currently doing NAT and the default
>>>> gateway for this NIC is 172.16.10.1 (wich is one of the ISP1s end), 
>>>> the
>>>> other NIC, Eth2, has a pool of servers with Public IP Addresses 
>>>> that use
>>>> the other ISP connection to go out by having this NIC with the gateway
>>>> pointing to 172.16.20.1 (the ISP2 has a static routing for this to 
>>>> work
>>>> on their side).  Also I just got an Extra ISP uplink  (not currently
>>>> used) wich i just want as a backup for the servers in case the 
>>>> other one
>>>> fails.
>>>>
>>>> What I'd like, is to have this same box running Vyatta Community 3. 
>>>> And
>>>> also to use VLANS Instead of whole NICs/Ports.  I managed to configure
>>>> the VLANS on the two VLAN capable NICs (wich also are GIGABIT NICs) 
>>>> like
>>>> this:
>>>> eth1
>>>> ID16- ISP1
>>>> ID17- ISP2
>>>> ID18- ISP3
>>>> eth2
>>>> ID 10-Servers
>>>> ID 20-Users
>>>>
>>>> All the Vif had the corresponding IPs.  The vyatta server sees all the
>>>> machines (users, servers, and all the ISPs end) and the VLAN
>>>> configuration was working fine with my cisco 2950 switch.  However, 
>>>> NAT
>>>> did not work fine and the routing i think wasnt working either.  Could
>>>> you help me to figure out a configuration for this type of scenario?
>>>> The problem is For NAT it asks for an Interface and this is Eth1 
>>>> for the
>>>> ISPs, but i need it to use a specific ISP, so how do i define it to 
>>>> use
>>>> a vif i

Re: [Vyatta-users] VLANs, NAT and DHCP scenario with multiple ISP

2007-11-20 Thread Rodrigo Romero III
i'll try that,
now for NAT on Private Network: what is the configuration for the 
private network to go out using a specific vif and masquerade the IP to 
use the one there on the vif?

and for Routing: do i need to enable forwarding or something?


Aubrey Wells wrote:
> to specify a vif ethernet interface, its . id> ie: for vlan 201 on interfce eth2, you'd say eth2.201
>
> You're going to have a problem with dhcp on a vif, as I found out. see 
> bug 2447 for two possible workarounds..
> https://bugzilla.vyatta.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2447
>
> do one of those workarounds, and it will work fine. it wont ask for an 
> interface, you just define the subnet to hand out.
>
>
> --
> Aubrey Wells
> Senior Engineer
> Shelton | Johns Technology Group
> 404.478.2790
> www.sheltonjohns.com
>
>
>
> On Nov 20, 2007, at 4:04 PM, Rodrigo Romero III wrote:
>
>> This scenario is very uncommon.  I have a Fedora box with 3 NICs, and
>> for security reasons I'll name all the Public Addresses with 172.16.x.x
>> IPs, and Private IPs will be 192.168.0.x:
>> eth0: ISP1-172.16.10.2/30
>> eth0.1: ISP2-172.16.20.2/30
>> eth1: Users-192.168.0.62/26
>> eth2: Servers-172.16.30.1/28
>> Eth0 goes to a hub that has both ISPs connected to it.  Eth1 (Users
>> Network) uses DHCP  and it is currently doing NAT and the default
>> gateway for this NIC is 172.16.10.1 (wich is one of the ISP1s end), the
>> other NIC, Eth2, has a pool of servers with Public IP Addresses that use
>> the other ISP connection to go out by having this NIC with the gateway
>> pointing to 172.16.20.1 (the ISP2 has a static routing for this to work
>> on their side).  Also I just got an Extra ISP uplink  (not currently
>> used) wich i just want as a backup for the servers in case the other one
>> fails.
>>
>> What I'd like, is to have this same box running Vyatta Community 3. And
>> also to use VLANS Instead of whole NICs/Ports.  I managed to configure
>> the VLANS on the two VLAN capable NICs (wich also are GIGABIT NICs) like
>> this:
>> eth1
>> ID16- ISP1
>> ID17- ISP2
>> ID18- ISP3
>> eth2
>> ID 10-Servers
>> ID 20-Users
>>
>> All the Vif had the corresponding IPs.  The vyatta server sees all the
>> machines (users, servers, and all the ISPs end) and the VLAN
>> configuration was working fine with my cisco 2950 switch.  However, NAT
>> did not work fine and the routing i think wasnt working either.  Could
>> you help me to figure out a configuration for this type of scenario?
>> The problem is For NAT it asks for an Interface and this is Eth1 for the
>> ISPs, but i need it to use a specific ISP, so how do i define it to use
>> a vif instead of a physical address like eth1?  Also i'm not sure if I
>> have to tell the system something so it can route all the traffic on the
>> different networks.  I'm very new with vyatta, i managed to use it a
>> couple of months ago and it worked fine using several NICs.  But now i
>> need it to work with VLANS.  Also, i'll need help with the DHCP server
>> because i think it will also ask me for an interface and i need it to
>> use a vif instead, i dont know if this would work but if it does, this
>> will save me a cisco1811 buy.
>>
>> I can only try this on Saturdays because it's the only day the network
>> doesn't have high usage.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> rodrigo
>> ___
>> Vyatta-users mailing list
>> Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
>> http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users
>
>

-- 
Rodrigo Romero III
General Manager
Avetti Global Services Corp.
An Avetti.com Company
The Century Tower, Suite 1611
Phone: (507) 236-4593
Fax: (507) 236-3381
Cell phone: (507) 6618-4278
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: avettisupport
http://www.carritodecompras99.com
__

NOTE: This e-mail is confidential and is intended only for the recipient(s) 
listed. Unauthorized use, disclosure, total or partial retention, 
dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or the information 
contained in it is strictly prohibited and sanctioned by law. If you receive 
this message in error, or you are not a listed recipient or someone authorized 
to receive e-mail on behalf of a listed recipient, please reply to the sender 
that the e-mail was misdirected and delete the e-mail. Thank you.

NOTA: Este correo electronico es confidencial y esta dirigido unicamente a los 
destinatarios listados. El uso no  autorizado, divulgación, la total o parcial 
retención, diseminacion, distr

[Vyatta-users] VLANs, NAT and DHCP scenario with multiple ISP

2007-11-20 Thread Rodrigo Romero III
This scenario is very uncommon.  I have a Fedora box with 3 NICs, and 
for security reasons I'll name all the Public Addresses with 172.16.x.x 
IPs, and Private IPs will be 192.168.0.x:
eth0: ISP1-172.16.10.2/30
eth0.1: ISP2-172.16.20.2/30
eth1: Users-192.168.0.62/26
eth2: Servers-172.16.30.1/28
Eth0 goes to a hub that has both ISPs connected to it.  Eth1 (Users 
Network) uses DHCP  and it is currently doing NAT and the default 
gateway for this NIC is 172.16.10.1 (wich is one of the ISP1s end), the 
other NIC, Eth2, has a pool of servers with Public IP Addresses that use 
the other ISP connection to go out by having this NIC with the gateway 
pointing to 172.16.20.1 (the ISP2 has a static routing for this to work 
on their side).  Also I just got an Extra ISP uplink  (not currently 
used) wich i just want as a backup for the servers in case the other one 
fails.

What I'd like, is to have this same box running Vyatta Community 3. And 
also to use VLANS Instead of whole NICs/Ports.  I managed to configure 
the VLANS on the two VLAN capable NICs (wich also are GIGABIT NICs) like 
this:
eth1
ID16- ISP1
ID17- ISP2
ID18- ISP3
eth2
ID 10-Servers
ID 20-Users

All the Vif had the corresponding IPs.  The vyatta server sees all the 
machines (users, servers, and all the ISPs end) and the VLAN 
configuration was working fine with my cisco 2950 switch.  However, NAT 
did not work fine and the routing i think wasnt working either.  Could 
you help me to figure out a configuration for this type of scenario?  
The problem is For NAT it asks for an Interface and this is Eth1 for the 
ISPs, but i need it to use a specific ISP, so how do i define it to use 
a vif instead of a physical address like eth1?  Also i'm not sure if I 
have to tell the system something so it can route all the traffic on the 
different networks.  I'm very new with vyatta, i managed to use it a 
couple of months ago and it worked fine using several NICs.  But now i 
need it to work with VLANS.  Also, i'll need help with the DHCP server 
because i think it will also ask me for an interface and i need it to 
use a vif instead, i dont know if this would work but if it does, this 
will save me a cisco1811 buy.

I can only try this on Saturdays because it's the only day the network 
doesn't have high usage.

regards,

rodrigo
___
Vyatta-users mailing list
Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users