Re: How cool is Zune

2006-11-06 Thread Peter Hinchliffe


On 03/11/2006, at 10:33 AM, Martin Hill wrote:




The story just keeps getting worse. Frankly I can’t see Zune  
getting any
sort of traction. Actually, I think Apple is the only one to  
benefit as in
one fell swoop Microsoft has killed Apple’s main opposition - the  
“Plays Fer
Sure” ecosystem - and admitted that Apple’s vertically integrated  
model is

the best after all.



And now we can add the fact that the Zune is apparently not going to  
be marketed outside the US in the foreseeable future.


--
Peter HinchliffeApwin Computer Services
FileMaker Pro Solutions Developer
Perth, Western Australia
Phone (618) 9332 6482Fax (618) 9332 0913

Mac because I prefer it -- Windows because I have to.




Re: How cool is Zune, but forgot reference

2006-11-06 Thread Peter Hinchliffe

Sorry all -

I sent this without including the reference URL

On 03/11/2006, at 10:33 AM, Martin Hill wrote:




The story just keeps getting worse. Frankly I can’t see Zune  
getting any
sort of traction. Actually, I think Apple is the only one to  
benefit as in
one fell swoop Microsoft has killed Apple’s main opposition - the  
“Plays Fer
Sure” ecosystem - and admitted that Apple’s vertically integrated  
model is

the best after all.



And now we can add the fact that the Zune is apparently not going to  
be marketed outside the US in the foreseeable future.


http://software.silicon.com/os/0,39024651,39163836,00.htm

--
Peter HinchliffeApwin Computer Services
FileMaker Pro Solutions Developer
Perth, Western Australia
Phone (618) 9332 6482Fax (618) 9332 0913

Mac because I prefer it -- Windows because I have to.




Problems after trying new version of Silverkeeper

2006-11-06 Thread Kaye and Geoff

Hi,

eMac OS10.2.8 backing up to partition on external firewire disk

We use Silverkeeper to do our routine backups. and recently upgraded. 
The new version(1.1.4) was incompatible with the old version, and 
offered features we wanted, including the ability to make the backup 
disk bootable. We archived our old backup (thank heavens), erased the 
backup disk, and tried out the new version with somewhat disastrous 
results.


Although the backup appeared to work ( it took a couple of hours and 
files appeared on the backup disk), the only entry written to the log 
was an error (code 50 - indicates timeout). After finishing the 
backup and rebooting we found that about half our applications had 
disappeared from the Applications folder (and weren't on the backup 
disk). That was solvable, since we had the archive. but we are left 
with a rather strange problem. Our internal drive now shows the unix 
directories (/var, /etc, /usr and so on) in the finder window.


Initially we thought it might be a permissions/ownership problem, but 
fixing permissions didn't sort it out (although there were thousands 
of file permissions that changed). Further investigation shows that 
our internal disk has / as its mount point. I would normally expect 
all disks to have /Volumes as the mount point.


Can we change the boot disk mount point without causing problems? If 
so, can someone remind us where the appropriate unix config file can 
be found? We're familiar enough with unix to be able to edit the file 
directly, but can't find the right file!


A secondary problem is the existence of an alias visible from the 
finder called dev that points to nothing (and gives an error), with 
root/wheel as owner/group having no access as the permissions, 
which are grayed out and unchangeable. Attempting to change the 
ownership from the finder asks for admin password, then gives a no 
permission error. It doesn't show up at all in Terminal, and /dev 
itself is fine. Any ideas?


Needless to say, we've gone back to the old version of Silverkeeper.

Cheers, Kaye  Geoff


--
Kaye Stott and Geoff Prince
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.omninet.net.au/~kg/


Re: Problems after trying new version of Silverkeeper

2006-11-06 Thread Robert Howells

Howdy Kaye  Geoff ,

In my experience with something like this the end result of trying to  
patch

 the existing system has never been totally satisfactory .

It has been quicker , easier , and more reliable to bite the bullet ,
Reformat the hard drive and copy back an archive  ..
but how effetctive that is for you depends on whether you
have actually archived a total copy of Applications and System ,
as well as your User files .

I use Superduper running from another source to copy the contents of  
a Disk Image

of my Hard Drive , back to the working Hard Drive.

The copy usually takes 1 to 2 hours and everything is sweet after.

Cheers

Bob



On 06/11/2006, at 11:40 AM, Kaye and Geoff wrote:


Hi,

eMac OS10.2.8 backing up to partition on external firewire disk

We use Silverkeeper to do our routine backups. and recently  
upgraded. The new version(1.1.4) was incompatible with the old  
version, and offered features we wanted, including the ability to  
make the backup disk bootable. We archived our old backup (thank  
heavens), erased the backup disk, and tried out the new version  
with somewhat disastrous results.


Although the backup appeared to work ( it took a couple of hours  
and files appeared on the backup disk), the only entry written to  
the log was an error (code 50 - indicates timeout). After finishing  
the backup and rebooting we found that about half our applications  
had disappeared from the Applications folder (and weren't on the  
backup disk). That was solvable, since we had the archive. but we  
are left with a rather strange problem. Our internal drive now  
shows the unix directories (/var, /etc, /usr and so on) in the  
finder window.


Initially we thought it might be a permissions/ownership problem,  
but fixing permissions didn't sort it out (although there were  
thousands of file permissions that changed). Further investigation  
shows that our internal disk has / as its mount point. I would  
normally expect all disks to have /Volumes as the mount point.


Can we change the boot disk mount point without causing problems?  
If so, can someone remind us where the appropriate unix config file  
can be found? We're familiar enough with unix to be able to edit  
the file directly, but can't find the right file!


A secondary problem is the existence of an alias visible from the  
finder called dev that points to nothing (and gives an error),  
with root/wheel as owner/group having no access as the  
permissions, which are grayed out and unchangeable. Attempting to  
change the ownership from the finder asks for admin password, then  
gives a no permission error. It doesn't show up at all in  
Terminal, and /dev itself is fine. Any ideas?


Needless to say, we've gone back to the old version of Silverkeeper.

Cheers, Kaye  Geoff


--
Kaye Stott and Geoff Prince
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.omninet.net.au/~kg/

-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml
Guidelines - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml
Unsubscribe - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: Video Cameras, HD, 1080 etc

2006-11-06 Thread Thomas James
Hi,

Be careful buying video cameras that burn to dvd, they aren't very
versatile.  They are not meant to be used to edit video on iMovie.

Of course, it is possible to rip the video off the dvds and edit them in
iMovie but its a lot of work.

The new Sony HD camera that saves its video to hard drive encodes in a new
format which is not natively supported by iMovie or Final Cut Pro either.
Its called AVCHD, and its a variant of H.264 so its likely that it will be
supported by Apple in the future, but not at the moment.  I haven't tried it
but you can probably open the video in quicktime.

For the moment, If you want true compatibility with Apple's software you are
better off going with HDV cameras which record 1080i video to the same
miniDV tapes that older cameras use.

Both Canon and Sony make consumer camcorders using this format:
http://www.canon.com.au/products/cameras/cameras_video/hv10.html
http://www.sony-asia.com/handycam/hc3/flash.html

Cheers,

Thomas.




 Hi 
 I've seen some new Sony Video Cameras labelled Full HD, 1080  and one that
 burns to DVD disk which provides direct playback on upcoming blue-ray
 devices
 What is full HD and 1080?
 Are these things we should be considering when planning a new video camera
 purchase next year?
 These 2 Sony cams record to DVD or hard disk drive. Are they still
 compatible with macs. Do they import into iMovie or Final cut?
 Thanks
 Rod Blitvich



[no subject]

2006-11-06 Thread Jude

For the moment, If you want true compatibility with Apple's software you are

better off going with HDV cameras which record 1080i video to the same
miniDV tapes that older cameras use.

Again, though, make sure you read up on HDV before you decide to 
purchase. This is a completely new format which requires a fast 
computer to work with, and must be 'conformed' at the end of editing 
which can take hours. Also, there are complaints about motion 
artifacts during any fast movement.


Some people love it though. Just a good idea to understand it before 
you buy it. And understand what changes you will need to make to your 
workflow to work with it.


[Meeting] Meeting Reminder Tuesday 7th November 2006 - 7.30pm

2006-11-06 Thread Daniel Kerr
Hi All

Just a reminder that tomorrow (Tuesday 7th November 2006) is the normal
WAMUG meeting.

Same place and time. (Starts at 7.30pm)
http://www.wamug.org.au/meetings/index.shtml
(Ignore the date and time part) :o)

Some interesting things will be on,.


There will be a 24 Intel iMac shown off, as well as the iPod range (iPod
Shuffle, iPod nano and iPod video) as well as software demos and more
interesting things.
Oh, and you can pick up your copy of the new MacTalk magazine as well.

Matt will come along dressed up as a horse seeing as it's Melbourne Cup
day!!

(OK, he won't really, but I got your attention for a second!)

So come along and enjoy!!


See you there.


Kind Regards
Daniel