Re: Daylight savings testing

2007-03-02 Thread Warren Jones

I think you've missed my point on this one Shay.
My point was: why didn't my clock roll back the second daylight  
saving should have finished (03:00 WDT 25 Mar)? And secondly, why  
does my time zone say WST instead of WDT?


Derek said that in his testing it too didn't roll back when it should  
but did within an hour.


I repeated my test and left it for quite a while ( 2h) and it still  
hadn't rolled back.


I'm aware of what you said about NTP (my sentence actually said the  
same thing as you) and I had made a very similar comment on this list  
to someone else previously.


cheers
woz

PS On further testing just now and using the date -u command to check  
for time differences from UTC, I see that If you set the clock to  
anything past 02:00 on 25 Mar, it assumes that DS has ended. So to do  
my test properly I assume I'd have to set the clock to 01:59, and  
wait 61 mins instead of setting it to 02:59 and waiting 1 minute. So  
I'll therefore conclude that the end of DS will work as it should.  
But it would be nice if Apple displayed WDT when it should instead of  
always WST.



On 01/03/2007, at 10:36 PM, Shay Telfer wrote:


Warren wrote:
Anyway, to check the end of the DS, I disabled NTP and set my  
clock to 25 Mar 2007 02:59:50 and was hoping that in 10 secs the  
time would be 02:00:00. Instead it just rolls over to 03:00:00.


I would have expected the DS zone changes to be independent of the  
NTP activation.


Comments?


The Network Time Protocol (NTP) simply synchronises the computers  
idea of what UTC (ie Greenwich Mean Time) is. Applying Timezone  
changes to UTC to work out what the local computer's time is is  
left to each individual computer's OS. Thus not being connected to  
NTP shouldn't make any difference for purposes of testing the  
daylight savings changeover.


http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1305.html
http://www.ntp.org/




Re: Daylight savings testing

2007-03-02 Thread Mervyn Giuliana Bond

Has the lack of roll-back got something to do with it only being 2 March 2007?
Merv

At 11:46 AM +0900 2/3/07, Warren Jones wrote:

I think you've missed my point on this one Shay.
My point was: why didn't my clock roll back the second daylight 
saving should have finished (03:00 WDT 25 Mar)? And secondly, why 
does my time zone say WST instead of WDT?


Derek said that in his testing it too didn't roll back when it 
should but did within an hour.


I repeated my test and left it for quite a while ( 2h) and it still 
hadn't rolled back.


I'm aware of what you said about NTP (my sentence actually said the 
same thing as you) and I had made a very similar comment on this 
list to someone else previously.


cheers
woz

PS On further testing just now and using the date -u command to 
check for time differences from UTC, I see that If you set the clock 
to anything past 02:00 on 25 Mar, it assumes that DS has ended. So 
to do my test properly I assume I'd have to set the clock to 01:59, 
and wait 61 mins instead of setting it to 02:59 and waiting 1 
minute. So I'll therefore conclude that the end of DS will work as 
it should. But it would be nice if Apple displayed WDT when it 
should instead of always WST.



On 01/03/2007, at 10:36 PM, Shay Telfer wrote:


Warren wrote:
Anyway, to check the end of the DS, I disabled NTP and set my 
clock to 25 Mar 2007 02:59:50 and was hoping that in 10 secs the 
time would be 02:00:00. Instead it just rolls over to 03:00:00.


I would have expected the DS zone changes to be independent of the 
NTP activation.


Comments?


The Network Time Protocol (NTP) simply synchronises the computers 
idea of what UTC (ie Greenwich Mean Time) is. Applying Timezone 
changes to UTC to work out what the local computer's time is is 
left to each individual computer's OS. Thus not being connected to 
NTP shouldn't make any difference for purposes of testing the 
daylight savings changeover.


http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1305.html
http://www.ntp.org/



-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml
Guidelines - http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml
Unsubscribe - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
Science teaches that we must see in order to believe, but we must 
also believe in order to see.


WMV to Ipod?

2007-03-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hi folks,
Is there a way to convert WMV movies to a movie that will play on your Ipod?
Tried Handbrake, Ipod Video Mac the ripper etc...

Have a great long weekend all,

Ken










Ken Jackson
Little River Studios
T:  08 9276 2303
M: 0409 770 747
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: www.littleriverstudios.com.au






Re: WMV to Ipod?

2007-03-02 Thread Ronda Brown


On 02/03/2007, at 4:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




Hi folks,
Is there a way to convert WMV movies to a movie that will play on  
your Ipod?

Tried Handbrake, Ipod Video Mac the ripper etc...

Have a great long weekend all,

Ken


Hi Ken,

Use this to convert them to an iPod-compatible format...
http://www.isquint.com/

Then import the files into iTunes and update your iPod :)

(To import the files go to file--add file to library) (in iTunes)

Cheers,

Ronni