[wtr-general] Fwd: Retiring OpenQA

2013-01-25 Thread Željko Filipin
The only thing that we still have at openqa is wiki[1]. In the next few
weeks and months I will move it to github[2]. Since my time is limited I
will move only pages that I think are still relevant. If you want to make
sure a page is moved to github please let me know. Or even better, move it
yourself. If you need help with moving the page(s), let me know.

Željko
--
[1] http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR
[2] https://github.com/watir/watir/wiki

-- Forwarded message --
From: Patrick Lightbody
*
*
You are receiving an email because you have some or all of a project hosted
with OpenQA. After almost 10 years, it's time to shut down OpenQA. The main
project in OpenQA has always been Selenium, which now runs under it's own
infrastructure and brand.

Unfortunately, OpenQA's traffic and interest has dwindled to the point
where maintaing the website and keeping it up is causing more harm than
good. Some of the projects have been inactive for years. Others have
already moved on to other places, like GitHub and Google Code.

*I have a request*: could you please let me know if you are OK with turning
off all services (wiki, website, etc) hosted at OpenQA for your project?
Or, if you aren't, let's work on a transition plan for you. My goal is to
have the services shut down in the next few months.

Thanks for all your effort and I'm sorry OpenQA didn't end up where I had
hoped. At the time there weren't great services like GitHub and Google
Code, so a combined home for development services (bug tracker, wiki, etc)
+ like-minded projects made a lot of sense. But today it's much less
important due to all these great tools for building software and social
networks to promote it. So, reluctantly, it's time to say goodbye to OpenQA
:)

I appreciate your help in resolving this final matter and putting OpenQA to
bed once and for all.

Patrick

-- 
-- 
Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search before 
you ask, be nice.

watir-general@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com





Re: [wtr-general] Re: Watir vs Watir Classic

2013-01-25 Thread Enrique Matta
Thanks for the clarification Jarmo and Dan!


--Enrique Matta


On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Dan  wrote:

> Thanks for clearing that up Jarmo!
>
>
> On Friday, January 25, 2013 11:28:31 AM UTC-5, Jarmo Pertman wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday, January 24, 2013 6:20:38 PM UTC+2, Dan wrote:
>>
>>> Actually the statement below about identifiers/locators isn't correct.
>>>  This is a ruby syntax thing and not a watir one.
>>
>>
>> Actually this statement isn't correct either.
>>
>>   b.text_field(:name => "q").exists?
>>
>> is actually same as:
>>   b.text_field({:name => "q"}).exists?
>>
>> In other words - it is a method invocation with one argument (a Hash).
>>
>> On the other hand, this syntax:
>>   b.text_field(:name,"q").**exists?
>>
>> Is a method call with two separate arguments (a Symbol and a String).
>>
>> Watir supports both syntaxes and converts into Hash one internally for
>> backward compatibility. This is done in watir-classic in format_specifiers
>> method at https://github.com/watir/**watir-classic/blob/master/lib/**
>> watir-classic/supported_**elements.rb#L184-L191.
>> There is some similar solution in watir-webdriver too.
>>
>> Using always a Hash syntax is a recommended way.
>>
>>
>> Answering the original question, watir is a meta-gem, which will install
>> and load the gem which works on your platform (watir-classic on Windows and
>> watir-webdriver on unix systems by default).
>>
>> So, install Watir and then start using watir-webdriver or watir-classic
>> depending of your OS and needs.
>>
>> Jarmo Pertman
>> -
>> IT does really matter - http://itreallymatters.net
>>
>  --
> --
> Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search
> before you ask, be nice.
>
> watir-general@googlegroups.com
> http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
> watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>
>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search before 
you ask, be nice.

watir-general@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com





[wtr-general] Re: Watir vs Watir Classic

2013-01-25 Thread Dan
Thanks for clearing that up Jarmo! 

On Friday, January 25, 2013 11:28:31 AM UTC-5, Jarmo Pertman wrote:
>
> On Thursday, January 24, 2013 6:20:38 PM UTC+2, Dan wrote:
>
>> Actually the statement below about identifiers/locators isn't correct. 
>>  This is a ruby syntax thing and not a watir one.
>
>  
> Actually this statement isn't correct either.
>
>   b.text_field(:name => "q").exists?
>
> is actually same as:
>   b.text_field({:name => "q"}).exists?
>
> In other words - it is a method invocation with one argument (a Hash).
>
> On the other hand, this syntax:
>   b.text_field(:name,"q").exists?
>
> Is a method call with two separate arguments (a Symbol and a String).
>
> Watir supports both syntaxes and converts into Hash one internally for 
> backward compatibility. This is done in watir-classic in format_specifiers 
> method at 
> https://github.com/watir/watir-classic/blob/master/lib/watir-classic/supported_elements.rb#L184-L191.
>  
> There is some similar solution in watir-webdriver too.
>
> Using always a Hash syntax is a recommended way.
>  
>
> Answering the original question, watir is a meta-gem, which will install 
> and load the gem which works on your platform (watir-classic on Windows and 
> watir-webdriver on unix systems by default).
>
> So, install Watir and then start using watir-webdriver or watir-classic 
> depending of your OS and needs.
>
> Jarmo Pertman
> -
> IT does really matter - http://itreallymatters.net
>

-- 
-- 
Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search before 
you ask, be nice.

watir-general@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com





[wtr-general] Re: Watir vs Watir Classic

2013-01-25 Thread Jarmo Pertman
On Thursday, January 24, 2013 6:20:38 PM UTC+2, Dan wrote:

> Actually the statement below about identifiers/locators isn't correct. 
>  This is a ruby syntax thing and not a watir one.

 
Actually this statement isn't correct either.

  b.text_field(:name => "q").exists?

is actually same as:
  b.text_field({:name => "q"}).exists?

In other words - it is a method invocation with one argument (a Hash).

On the other hand, this syntax:
  b.text_field(:name,"q").exists?

Is a method call with two separate arguments (a Symbol and a String).

Watir supports both syntaxes and converts into Hash one internally for 
backward compatibility. This is done in watir-classic in format_specifiers 
method 
at 
https://github.com/watir/watir-classic/blob/master/lib/watir-classic/supported_elements.rb#L184-L191.
 
There is some similar solution in watir-webdriver too.

Using always a Hash syntax is a recommended way.
 

Answering the original question, watir is a meta-gem, which will install 
and load the gem which works on your platform (watir-classic on Windows and 
watir-webdriver on unix systems by default).

So, install Watir and then start using watir-webdriver or watir-classic 
depending of your OS and needs.

Jarmo Pertman
-
IT does really matter - http://itreallymatters.net

-- 
-- 
Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search before 
you ask, be nice.

watir-general@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com