Re: Is Wonder's javadoc down?

[Ricardo Parada]

Great job. Thanks!!!


> On May 2, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Musall, Maik  wrote:
> 
> Thanks Johann,
> 
> javadocs are up again! Great job!
> 
> https://jenkins.wocommunity.org/job/Wonder7/lastSuccessfulBuild/javadoc/index.html
> 
> I also had to adjust Jenkins' Content Security Policy [1], because it 
> wouldn't show much otherwise with a newer Jenkins version. Safari is still 
> complaining about the Javascripts, but the site does mostly work. Is it ok 
> like it is now?
> 
> Maik
> 
> 
> [1] 
> https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Configuring+Content+Security+Policy
> 
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34315723/blocked-script-execution-in-url-because-the-documents-frame-is-sandboxed-and#34372607
> 
> 
>> Am 02.05.2017 um 16:20 schrieb Johann Werner :
>> 
>> Hi Maik,
>> 
>> finally I had a look at the Javadoc problem and I could identify the cause 
>> of the problem. In one of those package.html file theres was some Javascript 
>> code hidden—in this case as simple as javascript:void(0)—which made the 
>> Javadoc task to stop execution and thus did prevent creation of the missing 
>> html files we were searching for.
>> 
>> Besides some other little fixes I removed that Javascript and voila I am 
>> getting all files I had expected. I just pushed a commit on master, please 
>> check if it is correctly building the Javadoc files on the Jenkins server.
>> 
>> jw
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 06.04.2017 um 10:26 schrieb Musall, Maik :
>>> 
>>> Hey guys,
>>> 
>>> seems like no one is able to help. But now I tried generating the javadocs 
>>> on the console, and when I do "ant docs", I also end up with a directory 
>>> dist/wonder/Documentation/api that only contains com and er subdirectories, 
>>> but no index.html and stuff.
>>> 
>>> (I also had encoding errors to overcome because ant would see utf-8 sources 
>>> as ascii, fix is in https://github.com/maiksd/wonder/tree/docs-fixes.)
>>> 
>>> Now, if someone can help resolving this to a point that javadocs can be 
>>> build on the console from the current wonder repo, I might be able to take 
>>> it from there.
>>> 
>>> Maik
>>> 
>>> 
 Am 28.03.2017 um 20:24 schrieb Musall, Maik :
 
 Hi Johann,
 
 here's the config.xml from the Wonder7 job. It's basically the same as on 
 the old Jenkins. (I hope this attachment makes it through the mailing list 
 server.)
 
 Maik
 
>>> 
 
 
 
> Am 28.03.2017 um 15:07 schrieb Johann Werner :
> 
> Hi Maik,
> 
> can you tell us what Jenkins config you did? Perhaps screenshots of the 
> job configuration page? You should not need any special plugins to create 
> the Javadocs, just the existing Wonder build.xml, ant and the correct job 
> setup ;-)
> 
> jw
> 
> 
>> Am 22.03.2017 um 01:16 schrieb Maik Musall :
>> 
>> Hi Paul,
>> 
>> I mainly copied the old config over, but the previous jenkins version 
>> was very old, and this one is now current. I don’t know if that could 
>> influence things. I tend to think it doesn’t. But perhaps I’m missing 
>> some plugin or something.
>> 
>> Maik
>> 
>>> Am 22.03.2017 um 00:50 schrieb Paul Hoadley :
>>> 
>>> Hi Maik,
>>> 
 On 22 Mar 2017, at 01:40, Musall, Maik  wrote:
 
 In regard to the javadoc, I mostly get the same result in jenkins as I 
 get with a local cmdline build. I was hoping someone with better ant 
 skills can take a look.
>>> 
>>> I’ve never tried to build the Javadocs from source, but it must be 
>>> doable. Maik, were you able to copy over the configuration from the old 
>>> Jenkins instance, or have you had to set this up from scratch? Pascal, 
>>> do you have a few minutes to take a look at some stage?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Paul Hoadley
>>> http://logicsquad.net/
>>> 
> 
 
 ___
 Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
 Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
 Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
 https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/maik%40selbstdenker.ag
 
 This email sent to m...@selbstdenker.ag
> 
> ___
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/rparada%40mac.com
> 
> This email sent to rpar...@mac.com
 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)

Re: Is Wonder's javadoc down?

[Paul Hoadley]

On 3 May 2017, at 4:10 am, Musall, Maik  wrote:

> I also had to adjust Jenkins' Content Security Policy [1], because it 
> wouldn't show much otherwise with a newer Jenkins version. Safari is still 
> complaining about the Javascripts, but the site does mostly work. Is it ok 
> like it is now?

Looks good here Maik.


-- 
Paul Hoadley
http://logicsquad.net/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/logic-squad/



 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: Is Wonder's javadoc down?

[Paul Hoadley]

On 2 May 2017, at 11:50 pm, Johann Werner  wrote:

> finally I had a look at the Javadoc problem and I could identify the cause of 
> the problem. In one of those package.html file theres was some Javascript 
> code hidden—in this case as simple as javascript:void(0)—which made the 
> Javadoc task to stop execution and thus did prevent creation of the missing 
> html files we were searching for.
> 
> Besides some other little fixes I removed that Javascript and voila I am 
> getting all files I had expected. I just pushed a commit on master, please 
> check if it is correctly building the Javadoc files on the Jenkins server.

Thanks Johann. Outstanding.


-- 
Paul Hoadley
http://logicsquad.net/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/logic-squad/



 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: Is Wonder's javadoc down?

[Klaus Berkling]

> On May 2, 2017, at 11:40 AM, Musall, Maik  wrote:
> 
> Thanks Johann,
> 
> javadocs are up again! Great job!

Whoohoo!!! Thanks.



Klaus Berkling
www.berkling.us  | Photography 




 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: Is Wonder's javadoc down?

[Musall, Maik]

Thanks Johann,

javadocs are up again! Great job!

https://jenkins.wocommunity.org/job/Wonder7/lastSuccessfulBuild/javadoc/index.html
 


I also had to adjust Jenkins' Content Security Policy [1], because it wouldn't 
show much otherwise with a newer Jenkins version. Safari is still complaining 
about the Javascripts, but the site does mostly work. Is it ok like it is now?

Maik


[1] 
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Configuring+Content+Security+Policy 


http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34315723/blocked-script-execution-in-url-because-the-documents-frame-is-sandboxed-and#34372607
 



> Am 02.05.2017 um 16:20 schrieb Johann Werner :
> 
> Hi Maik,
> 
> finally I had a look at the Javadoc problem and I could identify the cause of 
> the problem. In one of those package.html file theres was some Javascript 
> code hidden—in this case as simple as javascript:void(0)—which made the 
> Javadoc task to stop execution and thus did prevent creation of the missing 
> html files we were searching for.
> 
> Besides some other little fixes I removed that Javascript and voila I am 
> getting all files I had expected. I just pushed a commit on master, please 
> check if it is correctly building the Javadoc files on the Jenkins server.
> 
> jw
> 
> 
>> Am 06.04.2017 um 10:26 schrieb Musall, Maik :
>> 
>> Hey guys,
>> 
>> seems like no one is able to help. But now I tried generating the javadocs 
>> on the console, and when I do "ant docs", I also end up with a directory 
>> dist/wonder/Documentation/api that only contains com and er subdirectories, 
>> but no index.html and stuff.
>> 
>> (I also had encoding errors to overcome because ant would see utf-8 sources 
>> as ascii, fix is in https://github.com/maiksd/wonder/tree/docs-fixes.)
>> 
>> Now, if someone can help resolving this to a point that javadocs can be 
>> build on the console from the current wonder repo, I might be able to take 
>> it from there.
>> 
>> Maik
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 28.03.2017 um 20:24 schrieb Musall, Maik :
>>> 
>>> Hi Johann,
>>> 
>>> here's the config.xml from the Wonder7 job. It's basically the same as on 
>>> the old Jenkins. (I hope this attachment makes it through the mailing list 
>>> server.)
>>> 
>>> Maik
>>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 Am 28.03.2017 um 15:07 schrieb Johann Werner :
 
 Hi Maik,
 
 can you tell us what Jenkins config you did? Perhaps screenshots of the 
 job configuration page? You should not need any special plugins to create 
 the Javadocs, just the existing Wonder build.xml, ant and the correct job 
 setup ;-)
 
 jw
 
 
> Am 22.03.2017 um 01:16 schrieb Maik Musall :
> 
> Hi Paul,
> 
> I mainly copied the old config over, but the previous jenkins version was 
> very old, and this one is now current. I don’t know if that could 
> influence things. I tend to think it doesn’t. But perhaps I’m missing 
> some plugin or something.
> 
> Maik
> 
>> Am 22.03.2017 um 00:50 schrieb Paul Hoadley :
>> 
>> Hi Maik,
>> 
>> On 22 Mar 2017, at 01:40, Musall, Maik  wrote:
>> 
>>> In regard to the javadoc, I mostly get the same result in jenkins as I 
>>> get with a local cmdline build. I was hoping someone with better ant 
>>> skills can take a look.
>> 
>> I’ve never tried to build the Javadocs from source, but it must be 
>> doable. Maik, were you able to copy over the configuration from the old 
>> Jenkins instance, or have you had to set this up from scratch? Pascal, 
>> do you have a few minutes to take a look at some stage?
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Paul Hoadley
>> http://logicsquad.net/
>> 
 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/maik%40selbstdenker.ag
>>> 
>>> This email sent to m...@selbstdenker.ag

 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: Is Wonder's javadoc down?

[Johann Werner]

Hi Maik,

finally I had a look at the Javadoc problem and I could identify the cause of 
the problem. In one of those package.html file theres was some Javascript code 
hidden—in this case as simple as javascript:void(0)—which made the Javadoc task 
to stop execution and thus did prevent creation of the missing html files we 
were searching for.

Besides some other little fixes I removed that Javascript and voila I am 
getting all files I had expected. I just pushed a commit on master, please 
check if it is correctly building the Javadoc files on the Jenkins server.

jw


> Am 06.04.2017 um 10:26 schrieb Musall, Maik :
> 
> Hey guys,
> 
> seems like no one is able to help. But now I tried generating the javadocs on 
> the console, and when I do "ant docs", I also end up with a directory 
> dist/wonder/Documentation/api that only contains com and er subdirectories, 
> but no index.html and stuff.
> 
> (I also had encoding errors to overcome because ant would see utf-8 sources 
> as ascii, fix is in https://github.com/maiksd/wonder/tree/docs-fixes.)
> 
> Now, if someone can help resolving this to a point that javadocs can be build 
> on the console from the current wonder repo, I might be able to take it from 
> there.
> 
> Maik
> 
> 
>> Am 28.03.2017 um 20:24 schrieb Musall, Maik :
>> 
>> Hi Johann,
>> 
>> here's the config.xml from the Wonder7 job. It's basically the same as on 
>> the old Jenkins. (I hope this attachment makes it through the mailing list 
>> server.)
>> 
>> Maik
>> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 28.03.2017 um 15:07 schrieb Johann Werner :
>>> 
>>> Hi Maik,
>>> 
>>> can you tell us what Jenkins config you did? Perhaps screenshots of the job 
>>> configuration page? You should not need any special plugins to create the 
>>> Javadocs, just the existing Wonder build.xml, ant and the correct job setup 
>>> ;-)
>>> 
>>> jw
>>> 
>>> 
 Am 22.03.2017 um 01:16 schrieb Maik Musall :
 
 Hi Paul,
 
 I mainly copied the old config over, but the previous jenkins version was 
 very old, and this one is now current. I don’t know if that could 
 influence things. I tend to think it doesn’t. But perhaps I’m missing some 
 plugin or something.
 
 Maik
 
> Am 22.03.2017 um 00:50 schrieb Paul Hoadley :
> 
> Hi Maik,
> 
> On 22 Mar 2017, at 01:40, Musall, Maik  wrote:
> 
>> In regard to the javadoc, I mostly get the same result in jenkins as I 
>> get with a local cmdline build. I was hoping someone with better ant 
>> skills can take a look.
> 
> I’ve never tried to build the Javadocs from source, but it must be 
> doable. Maik, were you able to copy over the configuration from the old 
> Jenkins instance, or have you had to set this up from scratch? Pascal, do 
> you have a few minutes to take a look at some stage?
> 
> 
> --
> Paul Hoadley
> http://logicsquad.net/
> 
>>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/maik%40selbstdenker.ag
>> 
>> This email sent to m...@selbstdenker.ag
 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: Is Wonder's javadoc down?

[Musall, Maik]

Hey guys,seems like no one is able to help. But now I tried generating the javadocs on the console, and when I do "ant docs", I also end up with a directory dist/wonder/Documentation/api that only contains com and er subdirectories, but no index.html and stuff.(I also had encoding errors to overcome because ant would see utf-8 sources as ascii, fix is in https://github.com/maiksd/wonder/tree/docs-fixes.)Now, if someone can help resolving this to a point that javadocs can be build on the console from the current wonder repo, I might be able to take it from there.MaikAm 28.03.2017 um 20:24 schrieb Musall, Maik :Hi Johann,here's the config.xml from the Wonder7 job. It's basically the same as on the old Jenkins. (I hope this attachment makes it through the mailing list server.)Maik

config.xml
Description: XML document
Am 28.03.2017 um 15:07 schrieb Johann Werner :Hi Maik,can you tell us what Jenkins config you did? Perhaps screenshots of the job configuration page? You should not need any special plugins to create the Javadocs, just the existing Wonder build.xml, ant and the correct job setup ;-)jwAm 22.03.2017 um 01:16 schrieb Maik Musall :Hi Paul,I mainly copied the old config over, but the previous jenkins version was very old, and this one is now current. I don’t know if that could influence things. I tend to think it doesn’t. But perhaps I’m missing some plugin or something.MaikAm 22.03.2017 um 00:50 schrieb Paul Hoadley :Hi Maik,On 22 Mar 2017, at 01:40, Musall, Maik  wrote:In regard to the javadoc, I mostly get the same result in jenkins as I get with a local cmdline build. I was hoping someone with better ant skills can take a look.I’ve never tried to build the Javadocs from source, but it must be doable. Maik, were you able to copy over the configuration from the old Jenkins instance, or have you had to set this up from scratch? Pascal, do you have a few minutes to take a look at some stage?--Paul Hoadleyhttp://logicsquad.net/ ___Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/maik%40selbstdenker.agThis email sent to m...@selbstdenker.ag ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: Is Wonder's javadoc down?

[Musall, Maik]

Hi Johann,

here's the config.xml from the Wonder7 job. It's basically the same as on the 
old Jenkins. (I hope this attachment makes it through the mailing list server.)

Maik



config.xml
Description: XML document



> Am 28.03.2017 um 15:07 schrieb Johann Werner :
> 
> Hi Maik,
> 
> can you tell us what Jenkins config you did? Perhaps screenshots of the job 
> configuration page? You should not need any special plugins to create the 
> Javadocs, just the existing Wonder build.xml, ant and the correct job setup 
> ;-)
> 
> jw
> 
> 
>> Am 22.03.2017 um 01:16 schrieb Maik Musall :
>> 
>> Hi Paul,
>> 
>> I mainly copied the old config over, but the previous jenkins version was 
>> very old, and this one is now current. I don’t know if that could influence 
>> things. I tend to think it doesn’t. But perhaps I’m missing some plugin or 
>> something.
>> 
>> Maik
>> 
>>> Am 22.03.2017 um 00:50 schrieb Paul Hoadley :
>>> 
>>> Hi Maik,
>>> 
>>> On 22 Mar 2017, at 01:40, Musall, Maik  wrote:
>>> 
 In regard to the javadoc, I mostly get the same result in jenkins as I get 
 with a local cmdline build. I was hoping someone with better ant skills 
 can take a look.
>>> 
>>> I’ve never tried to build the Javadocs from source, but it must be doable. 
>>> Maik, were you able to copy over the configuration from the old Jenkins 
>>> instance, or have you had to set this up from scratch? Pascal, do you have 
>>> a few minutes to take a look at some stage?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Paul Hoadley
>>> http://logicsquad.net/
>>> 
> 

 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: Is Wonder's javadoc down?

[Johann Werner]

Hi Maik,

can you tell us what Jenkins config you did? Perhaps screenshots of the job 
configuration page? You should not need any special plugins to create the 
Javadocs, just the existing Wonder build.xml, ant and the correct job setup ;-)

jw


> Am 22.03.2017 um 01:16 schrieb Maik Musall :
> 
> Hi Paul,
> 
> I mainly copied the old config over, but the previous jenkins version was 
> very old, and this one is now current. I don’t know if that could influence 
> things. I tend to think it doesn’t. But perhaps I’m missing some plugin or 
> something.
> 
> Maik
> 
>> Am 22.03.2017 um 00:50 schrieb Paul Hoadley :
>> 
>> Hi Maik,
>> 
>> On 22 Mar 2017, at 01:40, Musall, Maik  wrote:
>> 
>>> In regard to the javadoc, I mostly get the same result in jenkins as I get 
>>> with a local cmdline build. I was hoping someone with better ant skills can 
>>> take a look.
>> 
>> I’ve never tried to build the Javadocs from source, but it must be doable. 
>> Maik, were you able to copy over the configuration from the old Jenkins 
>> instance, or have you had to set this up from scratch? Pascal, do you have a 
>> few minutes to take a look at some stage?
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Paul Hoadley
>> http://logicsquad.net/
>> 



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: Is Wonder's javadoc down?

[Maik Musall]

Hi Paul,

I mainly copied the old config over, but the previous jenkins version was very 
old, and this one is now current. I don’t know if that could influence things. 
I tend to think it doesn’t. But perhaps I’m missing some plugin or something.

Maik

> Am 22.03.2017 um 00:50 schrieb Paul Hoadley :
> 
> Hi Maik,
> 
> On 22 Mar 2017, at 01:40, Musall, Maik  wrote:
> 
>> In regard to the javadoc, I mostly get the same result in jenkins as I get 
>> with a local cmdline build. I was hoping someone with better ant skills can 
>> take a look.
> 
> I’ve never tried to build the Javadocs from source, but it must be doable. 
> Maik, were you able to copy over the configuration from the old Jenkins 
> instance, or have you had to set this up from scratch? Pascal, do you have a 
> few minutes to take a look at some stage?
> 
> 
> -- 
> Paul Hoadley
> http://logicsquad.net/
> 
> 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: Is Wonder's javadoc down?

[Paul Hoadley]

Hi Maik,

On 22 Mar 2017, at 01:40, Musall, Maik  wrote:

> In regard to the javadoc, I mostly get the same result in jenkins as I get 
> with a local cmdline build. I was hoping someone with better ant skills can 
> take a look.

I’ve never tried to build the Javadocs from source, but it must be doable. 
Maik, were you able to copy over the configuration from the old Jenkins 
instance, or have you had to set this up from scratch? Pascal, do you have a 
few minutes to take a look at some stage?


-- 
Paul Hoadley
http://logicsquad.net/



 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: Is Wonder's javadoc down?

[Musall, Maik]

Hi,

yes, the javadoc fails to build. See my email from a week ago, where I seeked 
help for the jenkins config, but no one responded. I also need Pascal to move 
forward with crowd and confluence, how is also not responding, so this whole 
thing is a bit stuck right now.

In regard to the javadoc, I mostly get the same result in jenkins as I get with 
a local cmdline build. I was hoping someone with better ant skills can take a 
look.

Maik


> Am 21.03.2017 um 14:15 schrieb Ricardo Parada :
> 
> Is Wonder’s javadoc down?  I usually access it using this:
> 
> https://jenkins.wocommunity.org/job/WonderIntegration/lastSuccessfulBuild/javadoc/
>  
> 
> 
> Thanks
> Ricardo
> 
> ___
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/maik%40selbstdenker.ag
> 
> This email sent to m...@selbstdenker.ag

 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Is Wonder's javadoc down?

[Ricardo Parada]

Is Wonder’s javadoc down?  I usually access it using this:

https://jenkins.wocommunity.org/job/WonderIntegration/lastSuccessfulBuild/javadoc/
 


Thanks
Ricardo

 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com